Trump renegotiates new price with Boeing for Air Force One

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,100
Reputation
-2,690
Daps
9,695
Reppin
Tampa, FL
Trump extracts pledge from Boeing on Air Force One costs

r


By Melissa Fares | PALM BEACH, FLA.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump extracted a promise from Boeing Co's chief executive on Wednesday that the cost of replacing Air Force One would not exceed $4 billion, his latest move to use the bully pulpit to pressure companies to help advance his economic agenda.

Trump met with Dennis Muilenburg of Boeing and Marillyn Hewson, chief executive of Lockheed Martin Corp - two defense companies he has made an example of since his Nov. 8 election, sending defense shares tumbling with his complaints about projects he said are too expensive.

He paraded the two CEOs in front of the cameras at the ornate front door of his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, where he is spending Christmas.

"Trying to get the costs down, costs. Primarily the (Lockheed Martin) F-35, we're trying to get the cost down. It's a program that's very, very expensive," Trump told reporters after meeting with the CEOs and a dozen Pentagon officials involved with defense acquisition programs who he said were "good negotiators."

Trump, who takes office on Jan. 20, has vowed to address government procurement costs as part of his industrial policy, which also includes taking a hard line on Chinese trade practices and renegotiating multilateral trade deals.

Also on Wednesday, Trump named economist Peter Navarro, an economist who has urged a hard line on China, to head up his White House team on industrial policy.

He also appointed billionaire investor Carl Icahn as a special adviser on regulatory issues, and said Icahn would help him choose the next chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Muilenburg, whose company was caught off guard by Trump's broadside earlier this month on the costs for replacing aging Air Force One planes, called his meeting "productive" and spoke admiringly of Trump's "business head-set."

Trump has said Boeing's costs to build replacements for Air Force One aircraft - one of the most visible symbols of the U.S. presidency - are too high and urged the federal government in a tweet to "Cancel order!"

"I think we're looking to cut a tremendous amount of money off the price," Trump said on Wednesday.

The Boeing 747-8s are designed to be an airborne White House able to fly in worst-case security scenarios, such as nuclear war, and are modified with military avionics, advanced communications and a self-defense system.

The company is currently under contract for $170 million to help develop plans for the planes.

Trump has said the planes, which are in the early stages of development and are not expected to be ready until 2024, would cost more than $4 billion.

“We’re going to get it done for less than that, and we’re committed to working together to make sure that happens," Muilenburg said, telling reporters he gave Trump a "personal commitment" that costs would not run out of control.

Trump has publicly pushed other corporations to change tack, taking credit for forcing United Technologies Corp and Ford Motor Co to alter plans to outsource jobs abroad. Ford, however, said it had no plans to close any U.S. plants.
Asked whether he had secured concessions from Lockheed Martin on its F-35 fighter jet program, which he has complained was "out of control," Trump said it was to soon to know.

"It's a dance, you know, it's a little bit of a dance. But we're going to get the costs down and we're going to get it done beautifully," he told reporters.

Lockheed Martin CEO Hewson, who left Mar-a-Lago without speaking to reporters, said in a statement that her meeting was "productive" and gave her the opportunity to talk about progress in cutting costs.

"The F-35 is a critical program to our national security, and I conveyed our continued commitment to delivering an affordable aircraft to our U.S. military and our allies," Hewson said.

The costs of the F-35s, used by the Marine Corps and the Air Force, and by six countries, have escalated to an estimated $400 billion, prompting it to be described as the most expensive weapon system in history. [nL1N1E717N]

Among the Defense Department officials who met with Trump was Lieutenant General Chris Bogdan, the F-35 program chief for the Pentagon.

(Writing by Roberta Rampton; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Alistair Bell)

Trump extracts pledge from Boeing on Air Force One costs
 

David_TheMan

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
38,068
Reputation
-2,751
Daps
85,284
There is no saving the F-35 program, it must be scrapped and moved on from.
IF Trump tries to "save" it, he is just getting a kick back on the backend.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
106,674
Reputation
14,111
Daps
307,910
Reppin
NULL
Nice thread title, what exactly did he "renegotiate" here?
i mean, when i go to a car mechanic, i get a fukkin written quote. and i refuse to pay them more

so why are we not doing the same thing with these contracts :what: why do we LET them go over? it sounds like thats pretty much what he said

and look, im not buying into this as some huge win for the country, its probably barely true. but its hardly anything to criticize :yeshrug:
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,793
Reputation
-10,615
Daps
151,886
Reppin
Inches
Last I heard that 4billion price was bs to begin w/.

Trumps about to get a Trillion $ infrastructure bill gifted to him by Republicans. Im sure much of that will be tax cuts, but he's going to build shyt and get all the credit. 8 yrs of this fukker. Time to look into Columbia. :francis:
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,599
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Unpopular opinion : When it comes to the military, costs of a specific program shouldn't be an issue. The point is to have the most effective equipment. The B-2 Bomber I think at last estimate costs 1.2 Billion per unit? But isn't it better that now America has bombers they can fly from Nevada or Maryland that can get into any airspace including Russian undetected, drop thousands and thousands of pounds of bombs fairly accurately, and return back all in a days work? Obviously the Russians don't want NATO allied countries to get the F-35, it totally outclasses their regular fighters. Sure Russia has some elite fighters that are better than the f-35, but the vast majority of their fighters are not ready for the F-35 and were designed to fight the f-16, which is going to be left behind.
 
Top