Trump: 'Robert E. Lee was a great general'

KingCesar

All Star
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
2,267
Reputation
1,070
Daps
9,837
being from up north and moving south, its just so odd for me to see Confederate names everywhere and people bigging up Robert E Lee

like we used to laugh in history class at how the North destroyed the south and how the Confederacy was a bunch of bums:heh:
I don’t remember how the Civil War was taught to me in school, but I have heard people try hard to make Lee seem like a better people and general than he actually was. Not to the same level as you’d find in some places in the deep South (I live in the DMV) where there are statues of the man, but still more complimentary than he deserves.

I’ve definitely heard people praise the skill of the Confederate armies and claim the Union only won due to superior manpower and resources. These people, of course, only focus on the one theatre of the war where the North was struggling. Everywhere else, especially in the more-important Western front, the Union was beating the Confederacy from the beginning. But try to argue with neo-Confederates and Lost Cause sympathizers, brehs. :snoop:
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
84,526
Reputation
12,767
Daps
229,503



Dearest Clementine,
Today marked the third occasion this year that our general, William Tecumseh Hustlemania, gathered us all around and told us the story of how, oh so long ago, before he ever put powder into a musket, he was putting powder into a white man's a$$hole...


:laff:
 

Trece

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
4,660
Reputation
570
Daps
15,344
Reppin
Los Angeles
Where the fukk do you nikkas live where even the idea that robert e lee was a good guy is accepted

No one saying Lee was good... bUT dude was a good general. His strategies are still studied.
Two things can be true at once,
Lee=piece of shyt
Lee=Brilliant general

Some of you cats are like machines that can also process one thought at a time..
Got damn, eat some breakfast
 

BigMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
33,341
Reputation
6,045
Daps
93,092
No one saying Lee was good... bUT dude was a good general. His strategies are still studied.
Two things can be true at once,
Lee=piece of shyt
Lee=Brilliant general

Some of you cats are like machines that can also process one thought at a time..
Got damn, eat some breakfast
how was he a brilliant general when he's a seditious loser
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
84,526
Reputation
12,767
Daps
229,503
Aint that treason? But again, CACs think that its all legal when its against black people
 

TaxCollector13459

2018 Coli Rookie of the Year
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
8,375
Reputation
1,692
Daps
19,747
No he wasn’t. Lee was a good tactician. Grant was a superior strategist.



Nah. Lee was better. Not taking anything away from president Grant by any means. He was a great commander and leader before his time.Ulysses just had a much better war machine supporting him and his efforts. The early part of the war the CSA was doing well. Stonewall was a problem for the union, once he went down it was a downhill slope. Lee even wrote a couple times in his diary how big the loss of jackson was.


There is a reason president lincoln wanted lee to assume the commander of the union forces position
 

TaxCollector13459

2018 Coli Rookie of the Year
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
8,375
Reputation
1,692
Daps
19,747
No one saying Lee was good... bUT dude was a good general. His strategies are still studied.
Two things can be true at once,
Lee=piece of shyt
Lee=Brilliant general

Some of you cats are like machines that can also process one thought at a time..
Got damn, eat some breakfast




Same way Benedict Arnold was a traitor and a POS. But tactically, the man was a savant on the battlefield for his time.
 

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,905
Daps
52,751
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
Nah. Lee was better. Not taking anything away from president Grant by any means. He was a great commander and leader before his time.Ulysses just had a much better war machine supporting him and his efforts. The early part of the war the CSA was doing well. Stonewall was a problem for the union, once he went down it was a downhill slope. Lee even wrote a couple times in his diary how big the loss of jackson was.


There is a reason president lincoln wanted lee to assume the commander of the union forces position

You need to explain how Lee was a better strategician than Grant. Especially given the 1864 Overland Campaign.

I also hope you know the difference between a tactician and a strategist in the realm of warfare
:francis:
 

Trece

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
4,660
Reputation
570
Daps
15,344
Reppin
Los Angeles
You need to explain how Lee was a better strategician than Grant. Especially given the 1864 Overland Campaign.

I also hope you know the difference between a tactician and a strategist in the realm of warfare
:francis:


I don't know if that is the question here but if you arguing that Lee wasn't at least equal to Grant in stately then you wrong.

I just finished watching a 7 hour Ken Burns documentary on the civil war on Netflix and some of the shyt Lee did to win battles was brilliant.. he took gambles like splitting his army that worked many times even though he had way less resources.
The biggest mistake Lincoln had was not having George McClellan who didn't want to use his army and was generally too safe for 3 years. Grant and Sherman were more aggressive but Grant still took L''s- he got that work from Lee in the battle of Chickamauga if you want one example.
Difference is Lee had Stonewall Jackson who was a great strategist himself.

In the end Grant and Sherman finally punished those slave holding fakkits and broke their will by burning everything they saw on a march to the sea.. that was the back breaker for the south..

Grant vs. Lee
 

TaxCollector13459

2018 Coli Rookie of the Year
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
8,375
Reputation
1,692
Daps
19,747
You need to explain how Lee was a better strategician than Grant. Especially given the 1864 Overland Campaign.

I also hope you know the difference between a tactician and a strategist in the realm of warfare
:francis:



I was trained by the same powers that trained both President Grant and General Lee..
 

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
11,642
Reputation
2,479
Daps
42,044
He was a great general, that’s undeniable. The South’s inevitable defeat would’ve came much sooner without his military poweress

Exactly. When you study that war you see lee was a problem. The confederacy had better commanders overall.
 

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
11,642
Reputation
2,479
Daps
42,044
Look at this thread closely, anybody who came in here and said anything positive about Robert E. Lee is a racist cac plain and simple. Notice these people try to extol the so called virtues of this slave owning piece of shyt while omitting that he was a racist slave owning piece of shyt which makes any other traits null and void.

He was a racist who owned slaves and led armies in defense of slavery and is the ultimate traitor to the U.S. Anything positive posted about him here is straight cac agent attempts at misdirection and confusion.

I’m Black.

You’re looking at history through an emotional lens. He was a General in a civil war. Like so many others throughout history. To believe that he simply fought to maintain slavery would be to believe that all those northern white men died to end it. And if you believe that you’re a fool. The civil war wasn’t about slavery.

You can’t just hide from the history you’re not comfortable with. That’s how you miss the lessons history contains.
 
Top