Trump will use stolen info in 2020 and would not tell the FBI

[the cac mamba]

Maybe honest too a fault.



Faux outrage. And you know its faux because it didn't exist when Hilary paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele for information he got from Russia and the response was largely crickets.



The FBI and AG are not politicians. Their perspective is understandably different. But when the FBI found out Hillary was using a foreign agent in the election, did they stop him or did they use his information to get a FISA approved?

Fall for the okie doke, brehs.

hillary clinton is not the president. how long is the right going to keep deflecting to her? 2020? 2024? 2028? she's dead? that's a serious question

 

[Starman]

hillary clinton is not the president. how long is the right going to keep deflecting to her? 2020? 2024? 2028? she's dead? that's a serious question

If Trumps response is wrong, it's not because he's the president. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Do you think that the difference in response between Trump and HRC is because got the job and she didn't?

Is using a foreign agent acceptable as long as you lose?

She DID what Trump is being asked about and the response was crickets!

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Faux outrage. And you know its faux because it didn't exist when Hilary paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele for information he got from Russia and the response was largely crickets.

So it's not a problem when Hillary does it?

 

[Starman]

So it's not a problem when Hillary does it?

Not for me. My problem is what the FBI and intel agencies did.

If HRC takes that info, and puts it in a ad or something, it would still be false and shady, but that's the game. The members of the intel agencies are in legal trouble.

 

[the cac mamba]

If Trumps response is wrong, it's not because he's the president. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Do you think that the difference in response between Trump and HRC is because got the job and she didn't?

Is using a foreign agent acceptable as long as you lose?

She DID what Trump is being asked about and the response was crickets!

why didn't you answer the question? i'm asking you how long the right will continue to deflect to hillary clinton

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

Bu bu but Hillary!!!!!!!


Orange man good. He tell truf. He no racist, he good man make murica grate again. Obummer is musslem. Nunes is murica hero.

 

[intra vires]

He's still not worth impeaching. Neville Pelosi has a secret plan to make him self-impeach.

She doesn't she's just against impeachment.

 

[Starman]

why didn't you answer the question? i'm asking you how long the right will continue to deflect to hillary clinton

hillary clinton is not the president. how long is the right going to keep deflecting to her? 2020? 2024? 2028? she's dead? that's a serious question

I'm using HRC to point out that the outrage is false. Nobody who let HRC get away with it can credibly claim to care about foreign agents in elections. Her actions are to recent and to blatant to ignore, but I see you're giving it your all. Why is that?

But when the FBI found out Hillary was using a foreign agent in the election, did they stop him or did they use his information to get a FISA approved?

Do you think that the difference in response between Trump and HRC is because got the job and she didn't?

Is using a foreign agent acceptable as long as you lose?

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Is using a foreign agent acceptable as long as you lose?

In September 2015, Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative political website, to do opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. In spring 2016 when Trump had emerged as the probable Republican candidate, the Free Beacon stopped funding investigation into Trump.[28] From April 2016 through October 2016, the law firm Perkins Coie, on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, retained Fusion GPS to continue opposition research on Trump.[29][30][31] In June 2016, Fusion GPS retained Christopher Steele, a private British corporate intelligence investigator and former MI-6 agent, to research any Russian connections to Trump. Steele produced a 35-page series of memos from June to December 2016, which became the document known as the Donald Trump–Russia dossier.[29][32] Fusion GPS provided Marc Elias, the lead election lawyer for Perkins Coie, with the resulting dossier and other research documents.[30][31]

The difference is that the foreign agent is not linked to/associated with a foreign government. That would determine if taking their info is right or wrong or just illegal.

 

[the cac mamba]

I'm using HRC to point out that the outrage is false. Nobody who let HRC get away with it can credibly claim to care about foreign agents in elections. Her actions are to recent and to blatant to ignore, but I see you're giving it your all. Why is that?

why can't you answer such a simple question?

how long is the right going to deflect to hillary clinton? 2020? 2024? 2028? or until she's dead? or even past she's dead?

it's not a difficult question. you seem ashamed to answer.

 

[Starman]

The difference is that the foreign agent is not linked to/associated with a foreign government. That would determine if taking their info is right or wrong or just illegal.

I don't know that it is illegal either way, or if there is a such thing as a "former" agent, but that's not what's responsible for the reaction to Trump vs HRC. Christopher Steele was linked to Russians in the Russian government. The link being that they are the source for his information! If reports are to be believed, anyway.

 

[Starman]

why can't you answer such a simple question?

how long is the right going to deflect to hillary clinton? 2020? 2024? 2028? or until she's dead? or even past she's dead?

it's not a difficult question. you seem ashamed to answer.

As long as she exists as an example of selective outrage, she will be pointed out. Please answer any of my questions.

 

[the cac mamba]

As long as she exists as an example of selective outrage, she will be pointed out.

so indefinitely?

embarrassing

 

[Starman]

so indefinitely?

Wait, so HRC be a glaring example of selective outrage indefinitely? Why is that? And why doesn't that bother you?

 

[the cac mamba]

Wait, so HRC be a glaring example of selective outrage indefinitely? Why is that? And why doesn't that bother you?

no one was talking about john mccain in 2011. no one was talking about mitt romney in 2015

the fact that the right has to continue to deflect to hillary clinton, almost 3 years after the election made her an irrelevant retiree, is embarrassing