#TrumpSet/ConspiracySet LAWST: 13 Russian Officials Identified as Part of DNC Hack UPDATE: 12 More

[Black Panther]

@Call Me James @Cali_livin @wickedsm @Hood Critic @BigMoneyGrip anyone else wanna get in on this?

 

[Stone Cold]

Ban bet.

If Flynn gets exonerated, I take a six month ban.

Not bushed. BANNED.

"Exonerated" meaning if exculpatory evidence is found that was withheld by Mueller from him/his legal team, and his charges are subsequently dropped as a result.

Not a plea deal. Not immunity in exchange for cooperation.

Exonerated.

But.

If Flynn is sentenced on ANY of his current or future charges, you eat the six month ban.

Again, not bushed. BANNED.

You in?

@tru_m.a.c @FAH1223

Bet

 

[wickedsm]

@Call Me James @Cali_livin @wickedsm @Hood Critic @BigMoneyGrip anyone else wanna get in on this?

why yes thank you Brother, i am in.

 

[Black Panther]

Bet

Filed, clown. :bpufedup:

 

[Black Panther]

What's the source?

"...The daily beast has learned"

"Career hacker forgot to turn off and on his vpn and it so happened his IP address was in Russia"

You're smarter than this

By the way:

Tumblr Confirms Daily Beast Reporting on Russian Troll Farm

YOU. LAWST. :bpufedup:

 

[Stone Cold]

By the way:

Tumblr Confirms Daily Beast Reporting on Russian Troll Farm

YOU. LAWST. :bpufedup:

Whats that have to do with Guccifer 2.0 and hacking the DNC?

 

[Black Panther]

Also for those unaware, @Ozymandias believes Flynn is set to be exonerated because Mueller supposedly withheld evidence that could clear him of all charges.

Why would my feelings be hurt?

@Frank Grimes wanted the full clip

flynn_case_full.pdf

I.

The FBI in late December reviewed intercepts of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn— national security adviser to then-President-elect Trump — but has not found any evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties to the Russian government, U.S. officials said.

FBI reviewed Flynn’s calls with Russian ambassador but found nothing illicit

II.

The FBI interviewers believed Flynn was cooperative and provided truthful answers. Although Flynn didn't remember all of what he talked about, they don't believe he was intentionally misleading them, the officials say.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/16/politics/fbi-not-expected-to-pursue-charges-against-flynn/index.html


And now Mueller's giving up all the evidence that favors Mike Flynn to Flynn's attorneys, super-ceding his Plea Deal

Spoiler

Judge Sullivan #blackexcellence

 

[Black Panther]

As it turns out, his belief is based on a filing error.

Your source doesn't agree with you.

No, a new court filing doesn’t suggest that Michael Flynn is about to be exonerated

“In nearly 25 years on the bench, I’ve never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I’ve seen in this case,” Judge Emmet Sullivan said as he overturned Stevens’s conviction. He ordered a special investigation into the incident, which was completed in 2012. It supported the whistleblower’s claim, determining that prosecutors had intentionally suppressed evidence that might have led to Stevens’s exoneration.

From that point on, Sullivan started a new practice for every case he handled: He would issue what is called a “standing Brady order,” mandating that prosecutors proactively turn over material favorable to the defense.

The problem arose on Dec. 12 of last year, shortly after Sullivan took over Flynn’s case. His clerks filed his standing Brady order — but filed the old version, not the version that was updated in November. That mistake was uncovered and, last week, the new version of the standing Brady order was filed. In making the change, the error was noted:




“After this case was randomly assigned to the Court on December 7, 2017,” the docket reads, “such an order was entered on December 12, 2017. Unfortunately, the prior version of the order was inadvertently entered rather than the Court’s current version.”

The current version actually demands less of federal prosecutors, Simpson notes. Before last week’s filings, the government would have had to turn over impeachment evidence to Flynn’s team as well as exculpatory evidence; now any impeachment evidence that might exist could be withheld.

There’s no suggestion that such evidence does exist. This mistake by Sullivan’s clerks seems to have gotten swept up in rampant social media conspiracy theories aimed at discrediting the investigation into President Trump. There’s no indication that Flynn will soon withdraw his plea agreement or that there exists exculpatory evidence that would prompt him to do so.

The answer to Napolitano’s question, “Was he guilty?” seems to be what it was last December: According to the FBI and Michael Flynn, yes.

Long story short, your "bombshell" amounted to a filing error from a clerk.

What you posted was from a previous version of the filing by mistake, instead of the current one.

There goes that talking point.
It's sad. It seems like you tried to put work into that one, too.

But here, let me preempt your response:

"I already knew it was a filing error breh, I just wanted you to think I was really this dumb to think this would blow the investigation and Flynn would be exonerated...tee hee [insert mis-applied Sun Tzu quote] "

 

[Stone Cold]

As it turns out, his belief is based on a filing error.

Yea my belief was based on a filing error, anybody else wanna take the bet?

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

reading the back and forth between @The Black Panther & @Ozymandias,
i thought the convo took place around he time Flynn first got charged.
never would i have imagined that anyone could believe and
argue that Flynn is going to get off scott free in March of 2018.

so i get done reading then i look at the dates on the posts

what manner of buffoonery is being doled out in this thread?
never would i have imagined that anyone could believe and
argue that Flynn is going to get off scott free in March of 2018.



i don't have the energy to argue with these clowns @The Black Panther, you're a better man than i.

 

[Stone Cold]

reading the back and forth between @The Black Panther & @Ozymandias,
i thought the convo took place around he time Flynn first got charged.
never would i have imagined that anyone could believe and
argue that Flynn is going to get off scott free in March of 2018.

so i get done reading then i look at the dates on the posts

what manner of buffoonery is being doled out in this thread?
never would i have imagined that anyone could believe and
argue that Flynn is going to get off scott free in March of 2018.



i don't have the energy to argue with these clowns @The Black Panther, you're a better man than i.

So I take it you in on the bet then

Add @Orbital-Fetus

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

 

[Black Panther]

LAWST.





Surgical Summer

@newworldafro @Ozymandias @Great Scott @LICE @thekingsmen @xCivicx @Adidacs @DEAD7

 

[Stone Cold]

No collusion

 

[Stone Cold]

LAWST.





Surgical Summer

@newworldafro @Ozymandias @Great Scott @LICE @thekingsmen @xCivicx @Adidacs @DEAD7