Tyga speaks on the Moors...and a cac does his cac thing..smh

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,194
Reputation
12,145
Daps
225,504
The sad thing is 99% of whites don't know their own history but, try to tell you about yours. When you really learn your history, there's no way you can ever feel inferior to whites again. We taught them....TWICE. We came before them. We started civilization. We was popping that crystal when they all thought it was beer and shyt :manny: Then they conquered the world after we civilized them, and like the lame nerdy nikka who rises to power, he wants to kill anybody who remembers he used to be the lame nerdy nikka. ESPECIALLY the cool fly nikka (blacks) that was that nikka before him. That's whites. Take a look around though...the pendulum is swinging back the other way. Nobody stays in power forever. And whites made alot of enemies the last 600 years :mjlol: I hope I don't die early. I would love to see the world in 2060 or 2070 :wow:

:banderas:

That shyt would be a sermon that would move mountains :salute:
 

observe

Banned
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
21,617
Reputation
2,579
Daps
30,864
Reppin
The Forest Where Hope Died
For one the Moors were not apart of the Arab slave trade which was limited to Southeast Africa/Zanj's of Eastern Africa.
indian-ocean-slavetrade.jpg


The Moors on the other hand were apart of the Trans Sahara trade like I stated to @BlackFruitPunch. The Moors would have been limited to Northwest Africa. During the Moorish people they wouldn't be able to just steam roll right in and take slaves of their choosing. There was powerful Sahelian kingdoms/empires like Ghana and Mali acting as buffer zones against foreigners wanting to expand further south. The reason for this is they wanted the source of their gold to stay secret. Since Sahelian kingdoms/empires like Ghana and Mali controled 2/3's of the worlds gold at one point.

But more important in the TST it was slaves coming IN than the other way around. And when I mean slaves coming in, I mean European slaves. During the times of the Moors there has NEVER been any black slaves linked to the TST being exported out of Africa. We only start to see black slaves linked to TST AFTER the Moorish period and AFTER the fall of those powerful Sahelian empires:
-Africa from the Seventh to Eleventh Century, UNESCO, 1988

It is a myth that wont go away that the Moors sold black slaves in large numbers. And also that large amounts of blacks were linked to the TST. If anything the Moors enslaved/imported large numbers of European female slaves which had an impacted on modern day Berbers(Moors) DNA; their Mtdna being a result of European slave woman and their Y-DNA being African E-M81(African slave master). Thats what most Northwest Africans in general are a result of in ancestry.


Do you read the dates on that map? Thats a map showing the Arab slave trade during the time when the British controlled the west coast of Africa so arabs couldn't go there like they used to do,, now here's the real map of transahara slave trade before 1500

 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,800
Daps
152,107
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
I doubt he even cracked a book. Probably watched hidden colors and was like

:ohhh:

Ima rock these nikkas when i get on instagram. No big deal. We should know our history pre egyptian up until today. It changes your perspective on practically every aspect of life.

Exactly. People don't realize Black ruled the earth for nearly 3000 years before whites got their shyt together.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,414
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,525
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Do you read the dates on that map? Thats a map showing the Arab slave trade during the time when the British controlled the west coast of Africa so arabs couldn't go there like they used to do,, now here's the real map of transahara slave trade before 1500



1. You guy that pic from Wikipedia "Arab Slave Trade", but you should have read this at the very top:
The Arab slave trade was the practice of slavery in the Arab world, mainly in Western Asia, North Africa,Southeast Africa, the Horn of Africa and certain parts of Europe (such as Iberia and Sicily) beginning during the era of the Arab conquests and continuing through the 19th century. The trade was focused on the slave markets of the Middle East, North Africa and the Horn of Africa. Slaves were of varied race, ethnicity, and religion.
2. The British didn't control West Africa until the late 1700's...
3. The map unlike my map doesn't show whether the routes are importation or exportation. It could be argued that, prior to the 15-16th centuries, Berber, Arab and Turkish/European slaves were just as likely to be shipped to Saharan (Sahelian or savannah) destinations just as frequently as black slaves were exported northward, which could not have been that frequent, due to already explained reasons.
4. There is no evidence to support large volumes of black slaves being linked to the Sahara slave trade, again:
"Except for the Zandj (black slaves) from lower Iraq, no large body of blacks historically linked to the trans-Saharan slave trade existed anywhere in the Arab world ... The high costs of slaves, because of the risks inherent in the desert crossing, which would have not permitted such a massive exodus ... In this connection, it is significant that in the Arabic iconography of the period, the slave merchant was often depicted as a man with a hole in his purse. Until the Crusades the Muslim world drew its slaves from two main sources: Eastern and Central Europe (Slavs) and Turkestan. The Sudan only came third. " -Africa from the Seventh to Eleventh Century, UNESCO, 1988
No historical accounts suggest large numbers of black slaves being exported through the Sahara during the medieval period.
5. Anyways back to point 3(which hardly ANYONE knows about...), "It is interesting to note the great demand of the Mali people for Turkish, Ethiopian, and other slave-girls, and also for eunuchs and Turkish boys. The slave trade thus went in both directions."- The Cambridge history of Africa: From c. 1600 to c. 1790, pp 90

And also....In the 1300's al~Umari wrote that behind the mansa of Mali's throne "stand some thirty Turkish [Mamluk] or other mercenaries, purchased for him in Cairo. One of them holds a silk parasol in his hand, surmounted by a cupola and a gold bird representing a sparrow hawk." Translation by D.T. Niane.

Again your map does show whether the routes are exportations or importations. Like I said earlier slaves in West African. And the during the time of your map, like I said it would be impossible for Berbers/Moors and Arabs to just steamroll right in and take slaves, when they themselves were under the thumbs of West African kingdoms like Ghana/Mali. And those kingdoms would not allow foreigners to venture that far. Again those Sahelian states would not need to export high numbers of slaves, since they most relied on gold, salt, ivory and controlling the flow of goods across the Sahara.
 

Mandarin Duck

Majestic and Highfalutin
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
25,893
Reputation
10,453
Daps
142,717
Reppin
Ponds
He is right.
The world is his culture.
Yet he's reduced to leaving instagram comments on rappers profiles to feel better about his shytty life instead of actually reaping the benefits of being in a world made for him to win.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,414
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,525
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
He is right.
The world is his culture.
Yet he's reduced to leaving instagram comments on rappers profiles to feel better about his shytty life instead of actually reaping the benefits of being in a world made for him to win.

Nonsense... By that logic almost everything in Europe is West Asian/Middle Eastern, South Asian, East Asian and even African culture.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,414
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,525
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
And again the dominant powers of the Western Sudan, Ghana, Mali, Songhay would have been strictly in control of raw material coming in and out of the Sudan: Gold, salt, slaves. Merchants would have to pay heavy taxes and duties for every unit of product.

I find it ridiculous to believe that a ragtag and disorganised Berber armies pillaging and raiding throughout the Sudan, with these main powers in control. The Almoravids(Moors) represent the exception of Berber Military might yet they were not even able to conquer Ghana, despite the ongoing historical myths of the Almoravid conquest of Ghana. Even near the close of Almoravid power in Spain, the Almoravids were paying homage to the Mande/Sudani King of Diafunu, the Almoravids(Moors) who were a short-lived empire which occupied the period between the collapse of Ghana and the rise of Mali.

Slaves who fell victim to the Saharan trade would have been victims of Sudanic kingdoms expanding and taking in war prisoners. Like I said prior on this thread. For instance the supply of Slaves to Tunisia, via Zawila would have been likely the result of the creation and expansion of the Kingdom of Kanem. Which is why I said slaves being exporting from the Western Sudan would be on the lowest behind; far behind gold, salt and ivory. It is only until later much after the Moorish period, around the 19th century that we see larger volumes of black slaves being linked to the Saharan trade.
 
Top