U.S. Colleges, International Students, and Donald Trump

aXiom

Maximized Potential
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,664
Reputation
8,516
Daps
69,734
Reppin
Parc fermé
International students on OPT visas can work after graduating and there is no cap on those visas.
They can only work for 1 year post graduation. Stem is a bit different where you can extend if you plan to further your studies, but they have to leave at the end of it.

F1 and H1Bs aren't the same thing.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
56,607
Reputation
15,640
Daps
209,384
Reppin
Above the fray.

04/25/25

Trump Administration Reverses Course on Student Visa Cancellations​

The sudden shift came as a reprieve for the more than 1,500 international students who have had their visas canceled in recent weeks.


The Justice Department building.

A Justice Department lawyer said immigration officials had begun work on a new system for reviewing and terminating visas for international students.Credit...Tierney L. Cross for The New York Times


The Trump administration on Friday abruptly walked back its cancellation of more than 1,500 student visas held by international students, announcing a dramatic shift by Immigration and Customs Enforcement during a court hearing in Washington.
Joseph F. Carilli, a Justice Department lawyer, said that immigration officials had begun work on a new system for reviewing and terminating visas for international students and that, until the process was complete, agencies would not make additional changes or further revocations.
The announcement followed a wave of individual lawsuits filed by students who have said they were notified that their legal right to study in the United States was rescinded, often with minimal explanation. In some cases, students had minor documented traffic violations or other infractions. But in other cases, there appeared to be no obvious cause for the revocations.
It was not clear how many student visa holders had left the country; students usually have at least a few weeks before they have to leave. But the Trump administration had stoked panic among students who found themselves under threat of detention and deportation with minimal explanation. A handful of students, including a graduate student at Cornell, have voluntarily left the country after abandoning their legal fight.

In March, the Trump administration moved to cancel visas and begin deportation proceedings against a number of students who had participated in demonstrations against Israel during the wave of campus protests last year over the war in Gaza. Federal judges had halted some of those revocations and slammed the brakes on efforts to remove those students from the country.
But in recent weeks, hundreds of students, including many from India and China, received word that their visas had been revoked. That caused a wave of panic across the country among students and academics whose prospects of finishing a degree or completing graduate research were upended without warning.
A spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
During the hearing on Friday, Mr. Carilli said the government was prepared to file the policy change across other lawsuits, potentially providing some reprieve for students who had sued to have their visas reinstated and remain in the country through graduation ceremonies in the spring.
Other lawsuits, including a potential class action in New England, have been filed seeking to stop the administration from more broadly from carrying out further cancellations
 

Gloxina

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
26,142
Reputation
11,053
Daps
93,736

04/25/25

Trump Administration Reverses Course on Student Visa Cancellations​

The sudden shift came as a reprieve for the more than 1,500 international students who have had their visas canceled in recent weeks.


The Justice Department building.

A Justice Department lawyer said immigration officials had begun work on a new system for reviewing and terminating visas for international students.Credit...Tierney L. Cross for The New York Times


The Trump administration on Friday abruptly walked back its cancellation of more than 1,500 student visas held by international students, announcing a dramatic shift by Immigration and Customs Enforcement during a court hearing in Washington.
Joseph F. Carilli, a Justice Department lawyer, said that immigration officials had begun work on a new system for reviewing and terminating visas for international students and that, until the process was complete, agencies would not make additional changes or further revocations.
The announcement followed a wave of individual lawsuits filed by students who have said they were notified that their legal right to study in the United States was rescinded, often with minimal explanation. In some cases, students had minor documented traffic violations or other infractions. But in other cases, there appeared to be no obvious cause for the revocations.
It was not clear how many student visa holders had left the country; students usually have at least a few weeks before they have to leave. But the Trump administration had stoked panic among students who found themselves under threat of detention and deportation with minimal explanation. A handful of students, including a graduate student at Cornell, have voluntarily left the country after abandoning their legal fight.

In March, the Trump administration moved to cancel visas and begin deportation proceedings against a number of students who had participated in demonstrations against Israel during the wave of campus protests last year over the war in Gaza. Federal judges had halted some of those revocations and slammed the brakes on efforts to remove those students from the country.
But in recent weeks, hundreds of students, including many from India and China, received word that their visas had been revoked. That caused a wave of panic across the country among students and academics whose prospects of finishing a degree or completing graduate research were upended without warning.
A spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
During the hearing on Friday, Mr. Carilli said the government was prepared to file the policy change across other lawsuits, potentially providing some reprieve for students who had sued to have their visas reinstated and remain in the country through graduation ceremonies in the spring.
Other lawsuits, including a potential class action in New England, have been filed seeking to stop the administration from more broadly from carrying out further cancellations
:dead::childplease:


This is insanity




The fukking damage from this administration will be felt for a very long time Smdh
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,755
Reputation
14,658
Daps
192,412
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
:dead::childplease:


This is insanity




The fukking damage from this administration will be felt for a very long time Smdh
No shyt his donors were losing money

Worst than trump are his enablers who co-sign his bs ,when he’s clearly screwing fundamental aspects of our society.

News flash: Americans are anti academic we rely on foreigners to fill the gaps.
 

DrBanneker

Space is the Place
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
6,217
Reputation
5,290
Daps
22,367
Reppin
Figthing borg at Wolf 359
not enough of us are applying to hbcu's.

I have a feeling this administration plus the affirmative action/DEI backlash from the courts will reverse part of this.
there is even a segment of us that discourage higher education altogether because of cost and "perceived" roi.
Being anti higher education is wrong but HBCUs are getting expensive as hell. HBCUs need money for financial aid for students. Average Spelman grad now has $100k of debt between student and ParentPlus loans. You can't fit ROI into that conversation?

Interesting to note, at a HBCU if you do not major in:

1) STEM
2) Nursing
3) Architecture
4) Business/Finance

You will not be expected to earn more thatn $50k UNLESS you go to Morehouse or Spelman and study economics or international relations
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
56,607
Reputation
15,640
Daps
209,384
Reppin
Above the fray.


Moody’s Warns of Credit Risk for Colleges Reliant on International Enrollment​

07/03/25
As the president’s campaign against international students persists, the ratings company says that certain institutions, especially those already operating on slim margins, may face financial consequences

An arrow points down over a map of the world merged with a diverse group of students.


Just over one in 10 higher education institutions enroll at least 20 percent international students.


Colleges and universities with a high percentage of international students face a credit risk as the federal government continues to target international students, according to a new report from Moody’s Ratings.

Those most at risk include the 11 percent of American institutions where international students make up more than 20 percent of the student body, the ratings agency said, as well as institutions that are already struggling financially. (In total, 6 percent of students at U.S. institutions come from other countries.)
“The reduction in international students presents a credit risk for universities heavily reliant on this demographic because of potential declines in tuition income, as international students typically pay full tuition fees,” the report states. “Additionally, with declining numbers of high school students over the next several years in the U.S. leading to fewer domestic students, universities intending to fill the gap with more international students may fall short.”

The report follows the Trump administration’s months-long attack on immigrants and international students specifically, which began with the sudden removal of thousands of students from the Student Exchange and Visitor Information System, putting their legal status at risk. Since then, the administration has implemented a travel ban that includes 12 countries, prohibiting students from those countries from studying in the United States, and has targeted international students at Harvard University specifically, attempting to end the university’s ability to host international students. The State Department has also increased scrutiny into student visa applicants’ social media presences.


It’s unclear as of yet how those factors will impact international enrollment in the fall. According to a recent report by the Institute of International Education, an approximately equal number of colleges and universities said they expected their international enrollment in the 2025–26 academic year to increase (32 percent), decrease (35 percent) and stay the same (32 percent) from this year’s numbers. But the percentage who expect a decrease was much higher than last year, when only 17 percent of institutions thought they might lose international students.


The hit to the sector may not be as significant as it would be in countries like the United Kingdom and Australia, where about 25 percent of all students are international, Moody’s reported. Still, if the U.S. lost 15 percent of its international student population, a substantial number of colleges could experience at least moderate financial repercussions, according to one projection.


About one in five colleges’ and universities’ EBIDA (earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization) margins would shrink by 0.5 to two percentage points, according to the ratings agency’s calculations.


“For entities that already are under fiscal stress and have low EBIDA margins (the median EBIDA for private nonprofit colleges and universities was 11.7 percent in fiscal 2024 and 10.7 percent for publics), a change of one or two percentage points could push them into negative territory, especially if they are heavily discounting domestic tuition or losing enrollment because of demographic shifts,” according to the report. “Also, many small private schools may need to contend with federal changes to student loan and aid programs, further depressing domestic enrollment prospects and stressing budgets, especially for those with low liquidity.”


The report stresses that this model does not account for any steps the institutions might take to mitigate those losses—especially at wealthier institutions. (Fifty-four percent of institutions with at least 15 percent international students are highly selective, while 25 percent are nonselective.)


“Institutions that are highly selective, or those with considerable reserves, may better absorb the impacts by adjusting operations or increasing domestic enrollment,” it states. “Some elite institutions are less reliant on tuition, deriving income from endowments, fundraising or research, thereby mitigating the financial impact
 
Top