U.S. top court rules for companies on birth control mandate

[The 2020 New Member]

re read my original post

I laid out nothing but points, its obvious you didn't read anything but the first 2 sentences

You highlighted some stuff but what are you trying to say? I don't want to infer incorrectly. Your employer doesn't have to cover plan b. I don't see a problem with that. I do know that shyt happens which is why I said an age provision would be acceptable in my eyes. Perhaps it would be a little easier to get what you're saying if you aren't calling me fukking dumb? Forgive me if I side with the business owners on a matter that usually comes down to your personal choice to take your pants off.

The people that this is really would effect haven't even signed up for this law so the problem again (in my eyes) is the precedent being set, not the fact that a privately owned, Christian company unsurprisingly has a dull view on women's bodies.

 

[Koapa]

then why frame it as a thing for whores?

I'm not framing in that way. Majority of us are gulity of having sex out of wedlock and/or not using a condom but you should be responsibile for your action. It's not hard. Have sex without protection, go get the morning after pill or have your chick on birth controll meds. It's that simple.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

As a Democrat I have no problem with this decision. In honesty, this mandate should not have been in the bill in the first place. If you’re gonna be out here fukking, don’t ask someone else to pay for your birth control meds. It’s called personal responsibility, especially if you’re out here raw dogging, go half on the day-after meds. It's like $50 dollars.

If it's rape, then yes cover that cost.

dawg, it goes beyond this cause the ACA goes way beyond sex acts

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

The SCOTUS just shytted on organized labor too, allowing workers to opt out of public sector union dues.

Keep thinking elections don't matter, dummies.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

No issue with this.

Want to screw around? Buy your own shyt.

Have you even read whats covered in YOUR insurance?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I agree to an extent that Christianity is the dominant morality among the people that create and refine policies in the US but . We feel that shyt out west, heavily.

It's too easy to not get pregnant these days. Government shouldn't have to cover birth control but considering they are obligated to have our welfare in mind, I think an age provision is appropriate. 25 is plenty of time to learn and get to a place where you can adequately deal with something as serious as terminating a pregnancy.

But condoms are so readily available that this really isn't even necessary. I will say that this sets an unsettling precedent for openly agnostic folks like myself.

think of it in a way similar to legalizing drugs.

 

[Chris.B]

Have you even read whats covered in YOUR insurance?

how is that related to this case?

 

[The 2020 New Member]

think of it in a way similar to legalizing drugs.

In what way? That it's up to the people in a given area to decide if these medications/procedures benefit their community?

 

[ExodusNirvana]

This is terrible and I don't understand how this could not be interpreted as a slippery slope towards all sorts of fukkery

how is that related to this case?

Kill yourself. Just tie a fukking heavy weight to your neck, dunk your head underwater and STAY there

 

[Chris.B]

This is terrible and I don't understand how this could not be interpreted as a slippery slope towards all sorts of fukkery


Kill yourself. Just tie a fukking heavy weight to your neck, dunk your head underwater and STAY there

Apparently the highest court of the land thinks it has nothing to do with it either.

The only idiot here is you.
fukk off you idiot

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

In what way? That it's up to the people in a given area to decide if these medications/procedures benefit their community?

huh?????????

Governments and MOST people don't like drugs, but criminalizing it hurts everyone in the long run

So with respect to birth control, giving people more options to prevent bringing kids into the world they can't take care of will help the community in the long run.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Apparently the highest court of the land thinks it has nothing to do with it either.

The only idiot here is you.
fukk off you idiot

This is where you're wrong.

The highest court issued an opinion, as they always do.

Not agreeing with them doesn't mean you're an idiot.

And 4/9 of that board agreed with most of this board.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

how is that related to this case?

Your insurance probably covers viagra and a whole host of non controversial drugs and what not.

I'm going to assume you don't read the fine print.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You highlighted some stuff but what are you trying to say? I don't want to infer incorrectly. Your employer doesn't have to cover plan b. I don't see a problem with that. I do know that shyt happens which is why I said an age provision would be acceptable in my eyes. Perhaps it would be a little easier to get what you're saying if you aren't calling me fukking dumb? Forgive me if I side with the business owners on a matter that usually comes down to your personal choice to take your pants off.

The people that this is really would effect haven't even signed up for this law so the problem again (in my eyes) is the precedent being set, not the fact that a privately owned, Christian company unsurprisingly has a dull view on women's bodies.

Do you know all the non-controversial, NON MEDICAL, shyt that company's insurance pays for?

 

[Chris.B]

This is where you're wrong.

The highest court issued an opinion, as they always do.

Not agreeing with them doesn't mean you're an idiot.

And 4/9 of that board agreed with most of this board.

Still a minority opinion.

So many b*stards being born by parents who don't give a fukk.

if you want to screw pay for it. Next step will be to cut welfare big time. About time we start making people responsible for their actions