Ubisoft: "We decided to lock them at the same specs to avoid all the debates and stuff"

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,746
Reputation
4,410
Daps
118,608
Reppin
Tha Land
lol you're not retarded we both read the article stop spinning

Little brother xflop can't keep up we gotta hold y'all hands thru this

The article is very vague, the quote does not say what you guys are claiming it does, and it has been corrected by ubisoft.

But none of that matters cause y'all believe what you want anyway. :manny:
 

backbreaker65

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,682
Reputation
-415
Daps
10,399
Reppin
The Passage of Time
the lies they tell. This is no new engine.
ubinvl3e.png
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,746
Reputation
4,410
Daps
118,608
Reppin
Tha Land
:umad:

Forcing parity so y'all ain't left behind is exactly what it says miss me with your bullshyt

No it actually says the CPU is what held both games back from better specs. X1 has the faster CPU so it cold be interpreted that its the PS4 holding them back.

The statement is vague and no context was given on purpose. The writer didn't even try to clarify, cause he gets more clicks this way. We don't even know if dude really said what the article claims. Never read a story from that site in my life. The officially statement from ubi, denies those claims, and history and common sense tells us that Microsoft nor anybody else can't force parity.
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,373
Reputation
14,169
Daps
246,528
Wont be buying this.

Lock them at the same specs to avoid debates :wtf: What kind of bullshyt reasoning is this.

Xbox once again ruining the potential of a generation.

I might be done with ubisoft products.
 

ltheghost

Payin Debts.... N40
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
6,508
Reputation
480
Daps
7,449
Reppin
Japan, but from the 989
I'm not feeling this shyt. I only have a PS4 and if Ubisoft is dragging their feet and putting out a product that could be optimized they should do it. Optimize it so it works the best for the Xbox 1 and the PS4. We don't want them to be the same because they are two different system. What the fukk is this shyt!? There might be some aspects that the Xbox does better than the PS4 but that doesn't mean you have to gimp the product to satisfy both consoles. This is fukking stupid, this is supposed to be next gen now, not a PORT for both systems. Optimize the game for each system. And don't give me that bullshyt that it will cost more because this game is ONLY coming out for two consoles and the modders will take care of the PC. I'm still going to buy the game (like a dumbass) because I LOVE AC, but this gimping for the consoles needs to stop. The makers of the Witcher are not doing this shyt. Why are you Ubisoft?

Update: They noticed their fukk up and gave the typical PC answer.

Update: Ubisoft says it did not scale down the game's graphics to accommodate one particular system, saying Pontbriand's comments were "misinterpreted." The company's full comment is below.

"We understand how Senior Producer Vincent Pontbriand's quotes have been misinterpreted. To set the record straight, we did not lower the specs for Assassin's Creed Unity to account for any one system over the other.

"Assassin's Creed Unity has been engineered from the ground up for next-generation consoles. Over the past 4 years, we have created Assassin's Creed Unity to attain the tremendous level of quality we have now achieved on Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. It's a process of building up toward our goals, not scaling down, and we're proud to say that we have reached those goals on all SKUs.

"At no point did we decide to reduce the ambitions of any SKU. All benefited from the full dedication of all of our available optimization resources to help them reach the level of quality we have today with the core Assassin's Creed Unity experience."

Misinterpreted.....Microsoft cut that CHECK!!
 
Last edited:

Beerus

Banned
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
11,997
Reputation
-3,330
Daps
16,302
Reppin
PC BRO #LWO
You m$ bytches all need to go play in traffic fukk yall cock suckers
Im happy i never spent full price for none of the AC games
PS3 gen: all pirated :umad:
PS VITA: it was on sale :mjlol:
PS4: I paid ten bucks for the ps3 version of black flag and paid another 10 to update it to the PS4 version Hard copy n i aint even finish that piece of shyt game :russ:

fukk ubisoft as a staff video game label and a fukking crew
French fukking fakkit ass motherfukkers can eat a dikk :pacspit:
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
49,243
Reputation
4,267
Daps
74,051
Reppin
Michigan
Dumbass, the X360 was MORE POWERFUL than the PS3.
Nope
Tons of xbox games were superior than the PS3 versions
Due to the cell processor's complex architecture requiring games build for it specifically. When developers built games for the Cell we got games like God of War III which damn near looks like a PS4 / XBO title resolution aside.
2yxok15.jpg
 

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
112,398
Reputation
12,228
Daps
214,748
Reppin
#DapCity
Niccas in here complaining about parity and trynna clown X1 but dont even have the latest high quality tv's :mjlol:

Yall still playing yall PS4's on tv's yall had since the PS2 or at best PS3 when Warhawk first dropped :russ:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,746
Reputation
4,410
Daps
118,608
Reppin
Tha Land
Nope

Due to the cell processor's complex architecture requiring games build for it specifically. When developers built games for the Cell we got games like God of War III which damn near looks like a PS4 / XBO title resolution aside.
2yxok15.jpg

Still peddling this nonsese. :heh: x360 was more powerful period.

Devs have said it. It's the reason why games like the witcher 2 and trials fusion didn't appear on PS3.

And by your logic

Due to the ESRAMs complex architecture requiring games build for it specifically. When developers built games for the ESRAM we got games like Ryse which damn near looks better than most PC titles resolution aside.

You agree?
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
49,243
Reputation
4,267
Daps
74,051
Reppin
Michigan
Still peddling this nonsese. :heh: x360 was more powerful period.

Devs have said it. It's the reason why games like the witcher 2 and trials fusion didn't appear on PS3.

And by your logic



You agree?
Except damn near everything on the XBO is known for a fact to be inferior to the PS4 hardware wise and can be proven.

360 had better development tools and a better GPU PS3 had a better CPU if utilized properly. 360 became the lead platform due to the tools and ease of development. PS3 ports were inferior because of inferior development tools.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,746
Reputation
4,410
Daps
118,608
Reppin
Tha Land
Except damn near everything on the XBO is known for a fact to be inferior to the PS4 hardware wise and can be proven.
No the X1 CPU is faster. And so is the esram if used correctly.

360 had better development tools and a better GPU PS3 had a better CPU if utilized properly. 360 became the lead platform due to the tools and ease of development. PS3 ports were inferior because of inferior development tools.

This is true, but the 360 was also stronger in general according to devs.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
49,243
Reputation
4,267
Daps
74,051
Reppin
Michigan
No the X1 CPU is faster. And so is the esram if used correctly.



This is true, but the 360 was also stronger in general according to devs.
esram pool is too small. a tiny amount of faster memory. that "faster" ram is why the XBO struggles to it 1080p in games. processor got a slight clock boost at the last minute but we see how much that helped.
 
Top