Undertaker's legacy is officially in the dumpster

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
127,963
Reputation
9,318
Daps
151,662
Reppin
Westcoast
I agree he should have left after the HBGOAT matches, all the matches since were meaningless

The one where the streak was broken is bigger than any of those non drawing Michaels matches. Shawn left in 2010 and returns to either silence or leftover boos from helping Cripple H in 2013. Lol@him popping up at Mania and getting heat for attacking a "WCW guy"...true legend he is:laugh:
 

Bankroll

Rookie
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
40
Reputation
-10
Daps
32
I disagree about his legacy being somewhat defiled. He has nothing to prove whatsoever to anybody. Dude was undefeated at Wrestlemania for over 2 decades, is multi time world champion, and has the longest tenure with the company. Nothing could beat him at 'Mania but "The Beast Incarnate" himself, Brock Lesnar. Their match at HIAC was golden, and pretty intense. Same goes for Sting, he has nothing to prove either.. being in the wrestling business for 30 years. Fact is, this is good opportunity for WWE to elevate their current, young star that is Bray Wyatt by putting him in a feud once again with Taker, and having Wyatt put over (who needs a win badly since his feud with Cena).
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
127,963
Reputation
9,318
Daps
151,662
Reppin
Westcoast
Elevating Wyatt is alright as long as they keep him going and not fukk him over by having him not back up what he says against Cena and Roman:laugh: It doesn't make any sense. It's a waste of time. Undertaker's legacy was taken care of back in 2000 or something. Rest of this stuff is just storyline.
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
31,554
Reputation
6,656
Daps
128,486
Reppin
The Last of the Outlaws
beating the Undertaker put is what Brock back where he needed to be as a character.

It's almost like some have forgotten how much Brock's luster had faded before Mania 30 thanks to losing to Cena right away upon returning and the even Steven nature of that HHH feud etc, it was looking like he was gonna be #22 in the streak going into mania, especially since he got the upper hand the week before 30.

Undertaker's "legacy" is more than intact and has been before the attitude era even got rolling. ..

him doing the favors for Bray in this feud seems like the right thing to do since he'll hopefully be around to promo off/play mind games etc with him.
 

Heelish

#TSC #spooky
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,373
Reputation
7,519
Daps
83,615
The one where the streak was broken is bigger than any of those non drawing Michaels matches. Shawn left in 2010 and returns to either silence or leftover boos from helping Cripple H in 2013. Lol@him popping up at Mania and getting heat for attacking a "WCW guy"...true legend he is:laugh:
Before the series with HBK, the streak was a piece of trivia, as in "did you know The Undertaker has never been beaten at WM?" status. HBK made it matter. Before their series, were there any classics? Only decent one I could think of is vs HHH at WM17. Never saw WM21-WM24 so I can't speak for those matches.
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
45,214
Reputation
6,754
Daps
177,296
Reppin
Dallas, TX
Undertaker's legacy in trouble?:russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ:

Taker is teflon bruh.
Before the series with HBK, the streak was a piece of trivia, as in "did you know The Undertaker has never been beaten at WM?" status. HBK made it matter. Before their series, were there any classics? Only decent one I could think of is vs HHH at WM17. Never saw WM21-WM24 so I can't speak for those matches.
How are you going to make an assumption and then admit to not having all the info:what: Taker & Orton tore the house down at Mania 21 & his matches against Batista & Edge were great as well, the only reason his matches with Michaels get more attention is because it's Shawn Michaels.
 
Top