United States would shyt on China in a 1v1 without even stepping foot on their soil

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,211
Reputation
12,955
Daps
134,519
"War" isn't what it used to be. Now the battle is fought using economics, misinformation, and through corporate espionage.

There's no need to invade a country when you're making big money off of them which China has been doing. The US basically sold off manufacturing to them, and in the process let them see and steal plans for tech which they've created bootleg versions of that are almost as good or in some cases even better.

China means to buy up land in Africa which has rare metals in them. With those metals they will tighten their grip on tech manufacturing and the U.S. will be forced to pay Chinese firms to access these materials if by some ghost of a chance manufacturing comes back to America. And the corporations making money off Chinese consumers ain't finna have hostilities with them. These motherfukkers couldn't contain a virus that has already killed over 2million people and Apple still having iPhone manufacturing there :francis:
 

Spence

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
18,598
Reputation
3,178
Daps
48,179
I saw a video that the only way to beat the US would be Russia and China joining forces, and even then they would win the home games in Eurasia, not any away games in North America :dead: USA never leaving the Top 3 spot for militaries
Vice ran a documentary and it basically summed up that if you removed nukes from the equation THE ENTIRE WORLD could attack us all at once and everyone would still get washed out :mjlol:
Article literally said “hit the gym rest of world” :deadrose:
 

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
21,759
Reputation
3,809
Daps
79,480
Mc Arthur also was talking that shyt: "We will be home for Christmas":francis:

Don't underestimate an adversary. War 101. :yeshrug:

If we keep it real, last time the US had the opportunity to fight China, the US ducked. :ld:

The US still has the advantage on paper tho.
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
82,757
Reputation
18,049
Daps
319,524
Reppin
The Truth
Yes we would but like others have said, they got nukes… they shoot, we shoot, allies start shooting, and boom… end of the planet
 

jerzboy

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
7,742
Reputation
1,383
Daps
25,253
Reppin
NULL
Question to all my military and government heads. How do we know exactly how technology China has. I’d assume it’s all speculation?
 

Spence

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
18,598
Reputation
3,178
Daps
48,179

Kind of unrealistic. He’s basing it on a unprepared attack where the USA wouldn’t be ready but we know intel would have all our assets in place in time. It’s also basing the war in just the sea when we would’ve by then made it a 4 front war on all sides not connected to Russia since India would love some of that smoke.
 

Spence

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
18,598
Reputation
3,178
Daps
48,179
Question to all my military and government heads. How do we know exactly how technology China has. I’d assume it’s all speculation?
Spies & spy satellites both tell you all the info you need. They are behind but they have been spending a ton of money to catch up to us. I think they are only about 8 years behind us as opposed to 15+ for the rest of the world. Their knock off f22 are embarrassingly bad as they only try to steal our stuff and knock it off rather than innovate.
 
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
5,508
Reputation
-390
Daps
7,238
Reppin
Kongo
I just wrote a lot about Chinese military history over the past 70 years. But it's all pointless, between the comments here about Nuclear and ICBM's. And even Stanley Kubrick's comedy "Dr. Strangelove", which clearly spells out why a land battle is next to impossible between countries of these sizes/armories. Meh it's pointless.

With that said, Chinese military history in the past 70 years is fascinating in its own right (The Long March, Damansky Island, South China Sea conflicts/island building). Worth reading up on.

you did all this fukking research, to no tell us your expert opinion on who would win.

tell us
 

Cal Cutta

Balthazar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,253
Reputation
442
Daps
3,903
Reppin
NULL
you did all this fukking research, to no tell us your expert opinion on who would win.

tell us

Sorry for being unclear. I don't have a call on who would win. I was only speaking on the fact that neither side would get any serious boots on the ground of their opponent (if at all). Going back to "Dr. Strangelove", they introduced the public to a term called M.A.D., which stands for Mutually Assured Destruction. That's what I think would happen. So I guess my thought is everyone loses.
 

ChatGPT-5

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
18,956
Reputation
3,163
Daps
59,476
The ground forces part is damn near irrelevant because neither army is gonna step on the other's soil because:

  1. Nukes
  2. It's a death sentence even without nukes.
  3. China doesn't have the amphibious capabilities to invade other non-land locked countries en masse.
They'd get wiped out if they tried to land troops on Taiwan, and their Navy can't contend with ours. Our carriers are much better and more advanced, our subs are better and faster, and our Air Force is better and more advanced. If their Anti-ship missiles aren't legit, then they're 50 different shades of fukked without nuclear weapons.
this makes no sense because with tech now, your carriers can get downed with mid range ballistic missiles , this isnt WW2.

something like this, video below, would assure your carriers, troops and planes not come near, but they didn't even have to spend the money. they cant compete with U.S military funding, but what they can do is focus their money on a counter that can disrupt it, very smart. missiles and satellite guidance.

the U.S is mostly ran off satellite GPS as well. they've already shown they can knock them out the sky at will, since they have pin point long range accuracy.
 
Top