US/IAEA reach Nuclear Deal With Iran

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,976
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I support Israel's right to exist, but I think their propaganda towards Iran is a little DELUSIONAL...

There is just NO WAY that Iran would launch a nuclear attack on Israel...A nuclear detonation in Israel will affect Palestine, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and etc...Such an attack will cause the ENTIRE world to attack Iran...Even Russia and China WILL NOT actively defend Iran...

It just wouldn't make sense for Iran to detonate a nuclear weapon in Israel...So, the fear mongering is boolshyt...

Israel doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons because it will make the Israeli army less potent, and force Israel to be more diplomatic...

Israel only survives because of the USA and they have the better weapons in that region...If Iran were to get a nuclear weapon, Israel loses all its power overnight...Suddenly, they will have to think 10 times before engaging their neighbors in arm combat...

If you are a Leader of a country, you SHOULD BE trying to get a nuclear weapon, it is NOT coincidence, countries with nuclear weapons DON'T get invaded...:mjlol:

i generally agree on your point regarding nukes

but the deal also lifted economic sanctions which trickles down into causing a more chaotic environment. the white house has openly admitted that they dont trust iran and that they sponsor terrorism. russia, apparently, also said they will sell iran more weapons now regardless of specificity in the deal because iran has the loot. i think israel isnt concerned as much with a nuclear detonation compared to advanced ballistics..which could then escalate because iran is emboldened with the nuclear backdrop. and if it got to a war between them and israel was doing damage, its not out of the realm of possibility to think that iran would say fukk it, theyre going down with us and push the button. :yeshrug:
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,765
Reputation
10,862
Daps
195,256
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
Following reports of a deal, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was quoted as saying that Iran would receive a "sure path to nuclear weapons" and "a cash bonanza of hundreds of billions of dollars".


giphy.gif
Big dummy doesn't realize it was guaranteed they would get a nuke with the old strategy, that's for sure. Sanctions and name calling were a proven failure. 6,000 centrifuges attest to that failure.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,058
Daps
641,705
Reppin
The Deep State
I support Israel's right to exist, but I think their propaganda towards Iran is a little DELUSIONAL...

There is just NO WAY that Iran would launch a nuclear attack on Israel...A nuclear detonation in Israel will affect Palestine, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and etc...Such an attack will cause the ENTIRE world to attack Iran...Even Russia and China WILL NOT actively defend Iran...

It just wouldn't make sense for Iran to detonate a nuclear weapon in Israel...So, the fear mongering is boolshyt...

Israel doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons because it will make the Israeli army less potent, and force Israel to be more diplomatic...

Israel only survives because of the USA and they have the better weapons in that region...If Iran were to get a nuclear weapon, Israel loses all its power overnight...Suddenly, they will have to think 10 times before engaging their neighbors in arm combat...

If you are a Leader of a country, you SHOULD BE trying to get a nuclear weapon, it is NOT coincidence, countries with nuclear weapons DON'T get invaded...:mjlol:
Your analysis is off since it says nothing about the Sauds.

If Iran gets one, Saudi Arabia will have one within 2 years of the Iranians.

You DO NOT want that
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,058
Daps
641,705
Reppin
The Deep State
Honestly, can't we do something? I'm tired of seeing him repeate the same shyt in every thread :snoop:
Yeah. Lets do something about you celebrating another nation run by insane theocrats getting a nuke and who openly support subversive religious terrorism around the world

Not to mention, both Iran and the Saudis DESERVE to be overthrown and replaced with better governments...nukes change that.

This shyt is one huge clusterfukk and anyone who doesn't agree with me I seriously wonder what it is they want out of this safe, protected, and relatively easy life they all live.

This is NOT good news.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,058
Daps
641,705
Reppin
The Deep State
You keep calling for regime change, but on what grounds? That you don't agree with them?
At least 239 people negged you.

Does that mean a puppet sibling or coworker we select should kill you, declare ownership of your computer and take over posting your account?
Thats how you want things to work?:usure:

Terms like 'regime change' are just western calls for terrorism.
When you are trying to overthrow an elected leader of a foreign country you are either A) sparking a war of aggression (if state sponsored) or B) conducting terrorism (if acting without the state).

In either scenereo, if your kids come home in flag drapped caskets you deserve what you get. :yeshrug:

I don't really care, now do I/

I support WESTERN POLICIES that benefit WESTERN GOALS

Its really that simple.

If nations don't want to abide, I support any measures to subvert them and create an environment more favorable to OUR INTERESTS.

Its really how the world works.
 
Top