I mean...American exceptionalism but from the leftWorld can only be understood through America’s policy preferences. If you align with them you must be bad, and if you don’t you must be good.
I mean...American exceptionalism but from the leftWorld can only be understood through America’s policy preferences. If you align with them you must be bad, and if you don’t you must be good.
Gaddafi was a tyrant and killed a lot of American soldiers and citizens in the 80s.
More Venezuelans are currently refugees than Syrians at the height of their crisis. They're not coming to the US but currently a burden on their neighbors...
Not sure why people gloss over what is happening there
I work for a bank and have clients in Venezuela. Trust me, the government has its hands all through the private sector.
American exceptionalism but from the leftWorld can only be understood through America’s policy preferences. If you align with them you must be bad, and if you don’t you must be good.
Because we have to deal with heavily armed migrant caravans from Central America. DUH!
Real thing though, Venezuela's crisis helped elect Bolsonaro in Brazil. Part of the reason is probably Venezuela is state collapse, not a war with cool coverage and blowing stuff up.
Why Is Venezuela in Crisis?
Second, while Venezuela has moved away from free-market capitalism, its economy is hardly socialist. The private sector, not the state (and still less the social economy), controls the overwhelming majority of economic activity. Between 1999 and 2011, the private sector’s share of economic activity increased, from 65 percent to 71 percent.
![]()
Idk how I forgot! It was just this week our resident sycophants were arguing that we need a wall like Israel to stop the marauding horde.
I think the entire region is wary of "leftist" governments after twenty years of rule and meager gains for the lower classes.
Most of the governments are "leftist/socialist/marxist" only in name idk why any reasonable person in the west would support the majority of them.
The military angle hasn’t been introduced. That’s would send more people fleeing the country and destabilize it further.More Venezuelans are currently refugees than Syrians at the height of their crisis. They're not coming to the US but currently a burden on their neighbors...
Not sure why people gloss over what is happening there
Part of the tragedy of Venezuela is nobody really wants to try to understand the full scope of what's going on. People want to cry "socialism" or make excuses for Chavez/Maduro when shyt is very complicated.
There is a socialism component to the story as Chavez and his programs used oil revenues in very good times to fund social programs. However, the problem with Venezuela (and Brazil) was not that they tried to do social programs but they believed the commodity supercycle would last forever. Brazil would never have had a trade surplus if not for inflated commodities and their economy crashed hard. But Venezuela wasn't just the case of some super-Marxists trying to implement socialism like Cuba in the 60s. A lot of it was due to economic mismanagement of the exchange controls and outright theft.
Venezuela exacerbated its problems by trying to hold it all together with insane capital controls (which I had to deal with in business as stated above). That was the start of the crisis: small and other politically unconnected businesses could not convert money to buy imports and then came the sanctions. The Venezuelan government began to run dry on foreign exchange when oil collapsed so they couldn't pump dollars into the economy to maintain the bolivar. So everything went to shyt.
They also isolated most of their neighbors which is never smart either. Did Chavez's socialist revolution play a part with this? Sure. But Veneuzuela is more in the dump now than Cuba or even E. Europe in the Warsaw Pact. It's a bit like Zim under Mugabe. A bunch of enriched and grizzled generals supporting a political leader hanging on at all cost.
This is pearl clutching. There's already food shortages, diseases that are killing people that had been previously eradicated, an authoritarian regime killing political opponents and tore up their constitution, and millions of refugees destabilizing their poor neighbors(something the US is partly picking the tab up on already). You're fine with that going on indefinitely?The military angle hasn’t been introduced. That’s would send more people fleeing the country and destabilize it further.
Bolivia on a smaller scale did the same thing except they saved their oil surplus money and haven’t fallen into economic ruin.
They still got political corruption of course though.
Part of the tragedy of Venezuela is nobody really wants to try to understand the full scope of what's going on. People want to cry "socialism" or make excuses for Chavez/Maduro when shyt is very complicated.
There is a socialism component to the story as Chavez and his programs used oil revenues in very good times to fund social programs. However, the problem with Venezuela (and Brazil) was not that they tried to do social programs but they believed the commodity supercycle would last forever. Brazil would never have had a trade surplus if not for inflated commodities and their economy crashed hard. But Venezuela wasn't just the case of some super-Marxists trying to implement socialism like Cuba in the 60s. A lot of it was due to economic mismanagement of the exchange controls and outright theft.
Venezuela exacerbated its problems by trying to hold it all together with insane capital controls (which I had to deal with in business as stated above). That was the start of the crisis: small and other politically unconnected businesses could not convert money to buy imports and then came the sanctions. The Venezuelan government began to run dry on foreign exchange when oil collapsed so they couldn't pump dollars into the economy to maintain the bolivar. So everything went to shyt.
They also isolated most of their neighbors which is never smart either. Did Chavez's socialist revolution play a part with this? Sure. But Veneuzuela is more in the dump now than Cuba or even E. Europe in the Warsaw Pact. It's a bit like Zim under Mugabe. A bunch of enriched and grizzled generals supporting a political leader hanging on at all cost.
This is pearl clutching. There's already food shortages, diseases that are killing people that had been previously eradicated, an authoritarian regime killing political opponents and tore up their constitution, and millions of refugees destabilizing their poor neighbors(something the US is partly picking the tab up on already). You're fine with that going on indefinitely?
so...its their fault, right?Part of the tragedy of Venezuela is nobody really wants to try to understand the full scope of what's going on. People want to cry "socialism" or make excuses for Chavez/Maduro when shyt is very complicated.
There is a socialism component to the story as Chavez and his programs used oil revenues in very good times to fund social programs. However, the problem with Venezuela (and Brazil) was not that they tried to do social programs but they believed the commodity supercycle would last forever. Brazil would never have had a trade surplus if not for inflated commodities and their economy crashed hard. But Venezuela wasn't just the case of some super-Marxists trying to implement socialism like Cuba in the 60s. A lot of it was due to economic mismanagement of the exchange controls and outright theft.
Venezuela exacerbated its problems by trying to hold it all together with insane capital controls (which I had to deal with in business as stated above). That was the start of the crisis: small and other politically unconnected businesses could not convert money to buy imports and then came the sanctions. The Venezuelan government began to run dry on foreign exchange when oil collapsed so they couldn't pump dollars into the economy to maintain the bolivar. So everything went to shyt.
They also isolated most of their neighbors which is never smart either. Did Chavez's socialist revolution play a part with this? Sure. But Veneuzuela is more in the dump now than Cuba or even E. Europe in the Warsaw Pact. It's a bit like Zim under Mugabe. A bunch of enriched and grizzled generals supporting a political leader hanging on at all cost.
yea it hasThe military angle hasn’t been introduced. That’s would send more people fleeing the country and destabilize it further.

