According to Meltzer, TNA has been profitable 3 years of its existence.
Your math is very off (for example Steiner never made close to that, especially his last runs, he was getting nothing, Sting makes the 500,000 but Angle does not), and you are not accounting for that TNA makes money through merchandise, house shows and PPVs. It's not very much money, but they do make money, there is no possible way they have lost 100 million dollars, there entire operating costs for a year are like 12 million dollars, so by doing your math they are making zero money for 8 years and then losing another 12 million on top of that?
and LMAO @ this. You think Vince McMahon would pay $20 MILLION DOLLARS for TNA? Are you fukking crazy?
he paid NOTHING for WCW and that was WCW, a company that had beat them in ratings, stole all his major starts and made it personal.
TNA has done nothing of relevancy to WWE. WWE doesn't really look at them as competition. Vince does watch them, and wants to one up them, but he isn't competing with them.
This is a TV taping from June that Hogan appeared on. How could they possibly have made money? That's a 9500 seat arena that TNA couldn't fill half. This is the case for most arenas they run aside from the TV in the UK. Remember the disaster TNA show last month In Missouri? They drew 250 people to a 7,000 seat arena.The Carter's losing 10 million on average yearly is very much feasible, given they never really made money on shows.
sounds like WCW fukkery all over again
then I go along with my day
