This shyt was way worse than barbarian. I can't think of literally one movie that requires leaps of logic like this one does.
Takes the kids dad to be interviewed and says she will do the talking cause he had a stroke and everybody is just like ok cool this is legit. Kid buying 100's of dollars of soup and nobody is like why the fukk this kid buying all this soup. Nobody comes looking for his parents EVER. Movie makes it a point to show ring doorbell footage of the kids leaving but nobody in that neighborhood had one to see them running into that fukking house huh. This shyt was beyond. Gay dude saying "i think she just cut my hair" after literally WATCHING HER CUT HIS HAIR enraged me for some reason to
ChatGPT couldn't write something this stupid.
No one has to worry about this bein “long legs “
levels of trash but maybe I need to stop drinkin alcahol before watchin horror movies
Koz nothin on this made me feel on edge the whole way through, or made it feel like a horror
Which is fine as I wasn’t really expecting that
I’m keen to understand outside of the gore violence what makes this a horror ?
“Bring her back “had a lot more elements of a horror then this di from suspense , anticipation of what was gonna happen next
This bein structured very similar to barbarian also , makes me me question his storytelling ability in film , is this the only way he can deliver a film
( side note I have no issue with the structure and the way he tied it altogether )
I stand by 7 as a very good ratin , at no stretch, qualify as bein a shxt ratin or a shyt film
But blassik ?? Maybe I have to watch it again , very good yes
I do feel I enjoyed sinners a lil more , and bring her back , but have no issue wit anyone wantin to place this above
And I also enjoyed barbarian apart from the endin , all In all
Def worth the price of admission, and when I think about it more I could see the ratin goin higher when I factor how well it’s put together
The ending once again didn’t really nail it for me but whatever
. 
it goes off the rails because people don't know what plot holes really are.
"how could they outsmart search dogs?"
I show how from the real life myths that people believe about bloodhounds
"why didn't they search Alex's house?"
they show people searching the house at least once, the 2 detectives. And Gladys basically moved the kids whenever they came to search. Which they show on screen.
the first 5 or 10 minutes of the movies is the little kid narrative voice talking about the investigating and they show all the searching and flashbacks.
but people on the internet still think it's a plot hole.
I'm done. I know this movie is fire because people want to be THAT GUY that found the mistake.
