isaygotdamn
Pro
And yes gravity absolutely was invented by an extended family of freemasons
Holy fukk







And yes gravity absolutely was invented by an extended family of freemasons







And your problem is that you deny your own senses because your science priests tell you toAtmospheric refraction bends light. Which also explains why they are only visible during sunrise/sunset. Your theories are what happens when someone's entire view of reality is based on basic human perception, and not evidence from other sources.
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, the sun is BELOW THE HORIZON, meaning that the earth should be BLOCKING the majority of the suns light from reaching the moon, according to heliocentric theory
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, the BOTTOM of the moon should be shaded, and the TOP of the moon illuminated by the small amount of sun not being blocked by the earth, according to heliocentric theory
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, it's actually the TOP of the moon that shaded and the BOTTOM of the moon that is illuminated, which makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE in the heliocentric model, because the earth is supposedly blocking the bottom part of the moon from sunlight
Now that I've destroyed ANOTHER argument of yours, why do you keep ducking my question?
Y'all gotta stop coming in here begging for my attention only to be embarrassedHoly fukk![]()
Basically why they are mocked you come into it expecting an intellectual debate only to realize you are arguing with a troll who learned via memes and YouTube.I'm saying flat earthers can't prove these theories which adds to the frustration of those engaged in debate.
I know that knowledge is like building and it has a foundation that you expand on.Never forget that you don't know what you don't know
Arrogance is the antithesis to knowledge/understanding
Y'all eurostepped past all the FACTUAL SCIENTIFIC information that I've been posting in here to contin


Again, the rocket itself was more dense than the air around it so it "sank" through the air until it hit the ground. Just like dense items sink in water. It's literally that simple
Again, I've proven multiple times in multiple threads that the inventor of "gravity", isaac newton, called it bullshyt when he got older and wiser. He didn't even want to be associated with the concept by the time he died
He was also an PRIMARILY an occultist. That's what MOST of his life writings were about
.You literally have not contributed anything of any intellectual value to this threadBasically why they are mocked you come into it expecting an intellectual debate only to realize you are arguing with a troll who learned via memes and YouTube.
And OP is a flat earther. "They" he said. Claim your gang @African Peasant
I know that knowledge is like building and it has a foundation that you expand on.
"Eurostepped."
2 attempt by a flat earther to use a race ploy when under pressure.
Same tired routine in every thread. Next is when you usually claim we (Black people)never believe in this shyt and someone tells you about the DOGONS and other such examples. Rinse recycle repeat
I'm saying flat earthers can't prove these theories which adds to the frustration of those engaged in debate.
According to who?
You?
Where in the universe have you ever seen a 1 sided flat object? How can a sheet of paper have one side?? How could I look at 1 side of a sheet of paper and not be able to flip it over and see the other side??Because as I stated earlier in the thread, more dense objects sink further to the groundEXAMPLE: of Flat Earther irrational question dodging.
You believe there is a dome otherwise the atmosphere would just diffuse into "space".
QUESTION: If there is no natural gradated transition between atmosphere and space (as the atmosphere would just diffuse into the lower pressure near vacuum of space), why is air thinner the further up you go?
If the atmosphere would diffuse into space wouldn't the atmosphere within your dome just diffuse into lower pressure areas within the dome so that it all evened out.
Let the questing dodging tap-dancing begin.
Earth's atmosphere is leaking. Every day, around 90 tonnes of material escapes from our planet's upper atmosphere and streams out into space. Although missions such as ESA's Cluster fleet have long been investigating this leakage, there are still many open questions. How and why is Earth losing its atmosphere – and how is this relevant in our hunt for life elsewhere in the Universe?
Again, I'm not understanding your questionWhere in the universe have you ever seen a 1 sided flat object? How can a sheet of paper have one side?? How could I look at 1 side of a sheet of paper and not be able to see the other side??
-I asked you to provide an image of the Earth in your eyes
-You provided the image of a top down view from above the sun/moon
-I asked are you saying the other side of this flat plane (the side where the sun/moon in your diagram would never be seen) is all Antarctica, which would give it a greater surface area than the rest of the world combined
-You then asked in so many words "what other side? Antarctica is only the rim of the flat plane"
-I'm now asking again how can a flat surface not have another side? And is it all what we know as Antarctica??
I followed the link...@blackpanther embarrassed you.Follow this link and read one of the many MANY flat earth threads on here where I'm dropping factual knowledge

Y'all are literally ignoring all of my factual proofs in this threadThey don't even try to establish and stick to a consistent model which underpins their beliefs.
When in doubt cry NASA.
When that doesn't work evade.
Build a model and produce a formal statement . nope and they never will do it because that way they could not jump evade around questions.
If you say soI followed the link...@blackpanther embarrassed you.
I will repeat his question which you dismissed as a strawman, "where are the solar selenehelion eclipses?" Also, if refraction doesn't explain them, why aren't they visible in midday?


This is what I was asking you. I think you just answered it by stating you believe the other side of the flat plane would be all ocean?Are you saying that you believe that antarctica is below the oceans and the same size as our entire plane?