You don't seem to understand what you're looking at in that picSo based on this you feel what we know as Antarctica- (back side of the "coin" in your model)- has a greater surface area than the rest of the planet (other side of the "coin")
You feel changes, not constants.How is it sensible to believe that the earth spins 1000mph, while revolving around the sun at 66,000 mph, while rotating around the "milky way" at 500,000mph, while the "galaxy" moves through nothing at over 1,000,000mph and yet you fell none of those motions?
Im looking at a flat surface from a top view. How can there not be a back side??You don't seem to understand what you're looking at in that pic
There's no "back side of the coin", i've never even heard of that concept with respect to flat earth
Antarctica is the ice ring on the outer rim
This is incorrectEarth isn’t flat. If it was, you could see straight across the world from high points. You can’t, because of the tilt of the planet.
For instance, you can’t see Paris from the London Eye, or the Shard, because of the tilt of the Earth.
I'm saying flat earthers can't prove these theories which adds to the frustration of those engaged in debate.
Oh ok understood.I'm saying flat earthers can't prove these theories which adds to the frustration of those engaged in debate.
I didn’t quote or tag you to begin withCool
Stop seeking my attention unless you're in here to actually have an intellectual discussion

The articles even state that the guy wasnt even a real flat earther..... He admitted that he only said he was to get more views and attention for his stunts. He said himself numerous times that he didnt really believe that shyt and it was just for publicityFurther proving my pointYou feel changes, not constants.
Yeah because you were being passive aggressiveI didn’t quote or tag you to begin with![]()
I most definitely can and have proven my points multiple times in multiple threadsI'm saying flat earthers can't prove these theories which adds to the frustration of those engaged in debate.