What age is it best...

Ezekiel 25:17

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
38,419
Reputation
3,044
Daps
135,597
Men I'd say 50 is the minimum, which suck because I'm 28 and still immature. Not in a bad way, being a late bloomer I still got a lot of shyt to do

And it kinda makes you jealous of those who had them early, even it could be a dumb decision. By the time they kids is grown they still got a lot of life to live

I might have 2 when I'm 38, I don't know. Not rushing myself
 

Mac Brown

Superstar
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
11,339
Reputation
6,673
Daps
38,358
Reppin
H-town
Why do you say 40 for men?

Only because of the age difference. Also your avg / everyday 40 yr old man is not physically in shape at all to run after small children.

BTW I'm around 40 myself, but I'm in great physical shape. I'm just being realistic.
 

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
17,805
Reputation
2,849
Daps
23,721
Only because of the age difference. Also your avg / everyday 40 yr old man is not physically in shape at all to run after small children.

BTW I'm around 40 myself, but I'm in great physical shape. I'm just being realistic.

Good points
 

⠀X ⠀

Geoff
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
20,551
Reputation
6,940
Daps
116,169
I'm 30 now and hope to be married by 38 so that I can start having kids by 40. I don't wanna be too old to keep up with my kids
 

kaldurahm

Superstar
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
4,846
Reputation
774
Daps
13,007
The problem is there's a greater likelihood of genetic abnormalities the older you have children. Biologically speaking you should have kids in your 20s but people don't have the funds and likely not in the right mindset.

I'll agree with the people that say 35-40 for women and probably late forties for men, but its probably better to have before 45, shyt I'll even go 40, cause honestly I think forties is pretty late, by the time your child in his twenties you're too old
 

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
17,805
Reputation
2,849
Daps
23,721
The problem is there's a greater likelihood of genetic abnormalities the older you have children. Biologically speaking you should have kids in your 20s but people don't have the funds and likely not in the right mindset.

I'll agree with the people that say 35-40 for women and probably late forties for men, but its probably better to have before 45, shyt I'll even go 40, cause honestly I think forties is pretty late, by the time your child in his twenties you're too old

At what age for a man before you risk your children having genetic abnormalities? I am 33 years and I might want to have children one day but I won't if I get a certain age and have to worry about genetic abnormalities. WHat would you say is the cut off age for men?
 

kaldurahm

Superstar
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
4,846
Reputation
774
Daps
13,007
At what age for a man before you risk your children having genetic abnormalities? I am 33 years and I might want to have children one day but I won't if I get a certain age and have to worry about genetic abnormalities. WHat would you say is the cut off age for men?
To be honest I don't know to much on the topic I'm sure a breh on here who studies biology/genetics can provide better information. I think generally speaking under 40 is better, but I think it's more to do with age of the mother. But I'm speculating haven't read up on this since college

Nothing guaranteed obviously, just the chances get higher as you get older iirc
 
Top