Are you guys really this clueless?
If Nordic countries imported millions of uneducated and unskilled Mexicans, Nicaraguans, Haitians, Cambodians, Pakistanis, Somalians, etc the way the US does do you really think they could continue to afford such generous welfare programs??? The fact of the matter is that countries like the US import poor people in mass numbers while Nordic countries do not. Poorer people use far more in government services and pay a lot less in taxes than educated and skilled people do.
Do you want diversity or do you want socialism? You can't have both.
Welfare Use by Immigrant and Native Households
Point taken, I will accept that L for the most part, though I will say
- America (like any country) NEEDS low skill workers. Everybody can't be a computer programmer
- We can (and should) tighten up our immigration policy and borders. Sentiments and policies change.
- America is wealthy in part BECAUSE of those immigrants.
- The tax curve is TOO progressive- low income workers do not pay anywhere near their fair share and as such we miss out on hundreds of billions of tax dollars that could go to paying for social programs.
Bottom line, we spend more per capita on private sector childcare, healthcare, higher education etc etc and are getting less and less back for our $$$. Women are leaving the workforce and taking tax revenue and GDP with them because they can't afford child care- and a country NEEDS a positive (>2) birth rate to remain logistically viable, so telling people not to have kids is not an option. Millenials are delaying all the adult milestones like moving out and starting families because they are saddled with student debt. Etc. etc. Social programs enable people to work and be more productive, and (WARNING: CONSERVATIVE TRIGGER ALERT) central administration of such programs can be a lot more efficient
A lot of folks say the govt cant do anything and they just make waste and all that, but as we are seeing now the private sector is just as bad, if not WORSE, for many essential services. And a lot of those same folks think getting Trump to "shake up Washington" is a good idea. I don't see the problem. You do make a good point about immigrants but again immigration policy can be changed a lot easier than driving down the costs of essentials in the private sector
