This makes no sense.Better than what we going through now. If the CEO wages were 30 to 50 times of the workers salaries, like the 70s, then the standard if living will increase again.
This makes no sense.Better than what we going through now. If the CEO wages were 30 to 50 times of the workers salaries, like the 70s, then the standard if living will increase again.
This makes no sense.
The top three myths about income inequalityThe pay gap is too big for us to be a first country anymore.

Forbes, the elites propaganda networkWSJ has that crownForbes, the elites propaganda network

No, this explanation is oversimplified. Money circulates and it circulates a lot faster in the hands of the poor than rich folks. Especially in today's climate of crazy low inflation and returns.Hopefully, this simple explanation helps put to rest the misconception that spending money is good for the economy while saving is bad.
Bruh. You can't keep using that roads and bridges bullshyt when it comes to socialist talking points.
We all know you're talking about welfare checks, universal income, and any aversion to encouraging people to work harder
If it were that easy it would have been done already. No govt wants a broke populaceRaise the standard of living, lower the cost of living, and make 95% of the population have more disposable income.

I still want to know what the Bernie Sanders dikk riders would say to the millions of people who would lose their jobs if the minimum wage was increased to $15.