"SORRY'S NOT GONNA HELP IT"
Owning slave ships, profiting from shares etc... Look it up, I remember researching it and it was facts.How and when?
It's alot to get into, i've had the argument countles times on here.. But crudely, it breaks down sorta like this..Repped
Please elaborate on the first part of your post?
rince Henry furnished each ship with a banner of the Order of Christ. The whole journey is well described in The Chronicles of Guinea by Azurara. Here is an excerpt describing the capture of the Africans in what is now Mauritania -
" We saw the Moors with their women and children coming out of their huts as fast as they could, when they caught sight of their enemy. Our men, crying out St James, St George and Portugal, fell upon them killing and taking all they could. There you might have seen mothers catch up with their children, husbands, their wives, each one trying to flee as best he could. Some plunged into the sea, others thought to hide themselves in the corners of their hovels, others hid their children underneath the shrubs that grew about there, where our men found them. "
The Portuguese attacked several other villages, and returned with no less than 235 captives. They were taken to Lagos in Portugal, and on the 8th August 1444, the captives were disembarked and marched to a meadow on the outskirts of town. And there was held Europe's first slave market. Azurara was there, and was moved by the terrible treatment of the Mauritanians:
The world is rip with the division the hell ya'll cats be talking about? It's been tribal wars before it was a damn coli. Before crackers started to label us with color codes people went by their nationalities, and ethnic names. I don't think their was a time period when all black nations on the earth were in unison and agreement don't know why ya'll act like it was no racial group is all in agrmeent.I peeped that slick shyt. This site is ripe with black division
Yes they did but the Slave trade on the East Coast of Africa was the Arabic Slave trade not Atlantic.That Ugandan president kept it all the real
![]()
The Portuguese were doing this on the East Coast and South of Africa.I’ve fought tooth and nail to show that many European powers (particularly the Portuguese) fought wars against Native Africans and took (not purchased..taken) them as slaves for the New World. This isn’t a small amount by any means and took place virtually through the entire slave trade.
Much of TheColi is based on Black division though so it’s understandle why you’ll see threads like this where the African apologies are in big red letters and the American apology (which wasn’t really an apology) is an after5ought at the bottom of the page, words like “European slave raiders” simply don’t compute for your average person on TheColi.
It was a minority I think what is lost on a lot of people is the size of the continent. You can tell this by the genealogy of the people and where they came from.It's true. And well-documented.
What really bothers me - is how many Africans and AA today claim (or think....) it was such a small percentage of tribes, chiefs and kingdoms involved - but we know that is not true.
Almost 13 million people don't get sold/kidnapped without major African assistance/support to help.
And west Africa. Nigeria capital Lagos was founded by the Portuguese.The Portuguese were doing this on the East Coast and South of Africa.
There's Portuguese forts in the coastal regions of East Africa from those era's still standing.
It was a minority I think what is lost on a lot of people is the size of the continent. You can tell this by the genealogy of the people and where they came from.
Depending on the European nations and where they touched down different techniques by the British, Dutch, Portuguese, Belgians. Some traded and some waged war.
There's tons of slaves that never left on boats but were wiped clean off the earth via genocide in places like the Congo (millions) and Namibia.

There's a lot that we still don't know but the Portuguese who are some of the earliest players were not trading when they started as mentioned in here. At some point they did but that was later. They had been doing this long before the British.I definitely understand. But, in the context of the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the exportation of the enslaved via West Africa — it wasn’t a minority.
I do acknowledge their was some resistance but it was more complacency and assistance.
The “second” Atlantic Slave trade consisted mainly of English/British shipping most of the enslaved out of West Africa.
The technique was trading people for guns and goods.
The Congo genocide was from 1885-1908 - 20 years after the American Civil War/Emancipation.
Atrocities in the Congo Free State - Wikipedia
Namibia Genocide was 1904 and 1908
Herero and Namaqua genocide - Wikipedia
As horrific as they were - and my heart goes out to the victims and their families - neither are related to the transatlantic slave trade.
there's no such thing... but I'll assume you mean that proto typical michael blackson ish based on mostly nigeriansI read these in a African accent.![]()
No Nigerian father accent to be exact.there's no such thing... but I'll assume you mean that proto typical michael blackson ish based on mostly nigerians