Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
the zone was allowed so players could learn how to beat it, those euro teams were confusing the hell out of the nba players when using the zone during the olympics

the zone was allowed so players could learn how to beat it, those euro teams were confusing the hell out of the nba players when using the zone during the olympics

He may be underrating current players, but players in the 70s and 80s were more sound fundamentally.....
Depends on what you mean. The pace of the game was faster then but the speed of the players wasn't nearly the same. The superstars were always amazing athletes, across eras, but the average NBA player is so much more athletic and quick than they used to be.
It's easy to make sure you're fundamentally sound when you don't got a 6'8 dude closing out on you like a bolt of lightning.
It's why you see guys like Chris Andersen knocking down threes when given sufficient time to square up.
The difference in athleticism between the 80s and now gets overrated. Athleticism does not equate to skill set. Its the reason why a team like the Spurs are always in the hunt for a ring.......
The only difference is you have guys off the bench that are long and athletic compared to the 80s.......But as far as the starting 5, I think its only a marginal increase in overall athleticism.....
The Spurs have plenty of very athletic and skilled players plus one of the greatest coaches of all time.
I didn't say athleticism was the end-all be-all but the speed of the game is entirely different than it used to be and it's a lot easier to keep your form in check when you don't got super athletic and long players in your face.
If you put someone like Javale McGee or Andre Drummond back on the 80s, they'd look like Prime Shaq.
Dude....You gots to be joking....You're talking about the era of big men.....Javele McGee can't dominate in this era where there are no big men...He would be a journeyman at best....Conversely, I can place Kevin Willis in this current gen, and he'd average 22 and 10 easily......
Dude, this isn't an era of no big men, this is an era where big men don't typically have offenses ran through them because of the changes in defense and the rule changes that happened after Shaq broke the game.
It's why great one on one post play big men are having trouble leading teams ( Cousins, Jefferson, Horford, Lopez).
It's very easy to deny entry passes, hard doubles come much quicker, average centers tend to be able to jump or have incredible length that make it hard to shoot over, etc.
McGee would make life hell off athletic gifts alone. Even Hakeem was like "Javale is off the charts talented with his gifts".
The league is more focused on perimeter dominance now and the most valuable big men aren't scoring bigs but ones that are typically defensive game changers who are fairly consistent at finishing the attempts they get (Dwight, Noah, Hibbert, Duncan, Davis, etc)
Ain't the 2011 Dallas Mavericks did though?
but also what if he reintroudces hand cheks again? cuz they went away with the zones being legal
I want arggue against that, but if that was dudes point why bring up Curry in the very next sentence. He's probably the most fundamentally sound guard in the game. Why would handchecking slow him down. shyt makes no sense.He may be underrating current players, but players in the 70s and 80s were more sound fundamentally.....
Damn near everyone runs a soft zone compared to how it use to be. Need @Malta to confirm doe
If they remove zones, all Bron has to do is get past his defender and score like Jordan.
![]()
The Kang couldn't handle the physicality of the old nba.
Bron actually bleeds, so you know them soft palms on Jordan ain't shyt compared to punches to the face. 