What if a law was passed that you couldn't have kids unless you were married for 5 years?

[Tom Foolery]

A human in 1965 is a human in 2019. They would still want to reproduce irregardless of the law. You can't fight biology

That's like saying bu bu bu its 2019, no one wants to eat food anymore like how they did in 1965

Come on man, you trolling?

The whole economic and social setup of America is completely different today than the 60's.

 

[UpAndComing]

Come on man, you trolling?

The whole economic and social setup of America is completely different today than the 60's.

Its completely different yet people do the same biological things


Have sex, have children, work for money/resources, look for spiritual inspiration, want to be entertained, etc. As it has been going since humans existed


Biology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else

 

[Mac Brown]

If such a drug/vaccine existed, then it would plummet the general population.

exactly.... that would be the purpose.

 

[Mac Brown]

Think this has anything to do with sex brehs

I know it doesn't. It's pop control.

 

[Tom Foolery]

Its completely different yet people do the same biological things


Have sex, have children, work for money/resources, look for spiritual inspiration, want to be entertained, etc. As it has been going since humans existed


Biology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else

So how is a Law restricting child birth to couples married 5 years Biological?

 

[Wild self]

Its completely different yet people do the same biological things


Have sex, have children, work for money/resources, look for spiritual inspiration, want to be entertained, etc. As it has been going since humans existed


Biology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anything else

True, but the population tripled in the last 50 years and resources are getting more limited due to more people occupying land, especially in (now) overcrowded cities and rush hour traffic.

 

[the cac mamba]

Instead, where are we on male birth control. Men say they think about sex CONSTANTLY. Waaaaaaay more than women do right? Welp they desperately need a safe, non-intrusiv, reversible sterilization option.

Provide men with financial benefits for use of male birth control. Tax breaks...
.

lets say tomorrow, someone announced an invention that completely and safely worked for male birth control. it was so easy to use, and so cheap, and it became so widespread that it put the power of having kids completely in mens hands. and different than condoms because you both know when the condoms on/that you're using it at all

do you think women would be 100% on board with that i feel like there would be some backlash, or at least some kinda societal change

 

[UpAndComing]

So how is a Law restricting child birth to couples married 5 years Biological?

Unless you're implying I'm making a Communist China type law, which I'm not, than I'm confused why you are still arguing over this

The time when Marriage rates was probably at the highest point of the nation in history at 1960, was the same time the Baby Boomer generation was born and birth rates were astronomical. That should have ended your argument, but yet you still want to argue it for some reason

 

[Tom Foolery]

Unless you're implying I'm making a Communist China type law, which I'm not, than I'm confused why you are still arguing over this

The time when Marriage rates was probably at the highest point of the nation in history at 1960, was the same time the Baby Boomer generation was born and birth rates were astronomical. That should have ended your argument, but yet you still want to argue it for some reason

But this is not the 1960s. This argument should have been done with when I told you that a few posts ago.

That makes your whole claim invalid. Your just trying to speak it into reality.