What's the better option? If Gary Johnson gets in the national debates I may consider voting for him. Other than that we shyt outta luck period. They already fukked over Sanders even though he's still in the race.
What Party Affiliation Would I FIT Under? (I'm Done With The Democratic Party After Sanders)
- Thread starter SirReginald
- Start date
You know my answer to this question. The first thing I posted in this thread.
We not communicating here. Just making statements that contradict one another back and forth.
Go do something else.
Thats not what i asked and thats a logical fallacy.the BLM protestors were not "attacked" for anything they said
They were attacked because they wanted to stop people from listening to the person they want ...NOBODY HAS THAT RIGHT...ever
the fukked up part is you would be the same one complaining if people did the same thing to someone you support
You said I never answered your question correct? This was when I told you why. Also, why would I vote for someone with TWO Pending FBI Investigations and a war-hawk who's destabilized countries in the middle-east? If I vote I vote with knowledge. If you are Black you are lost.
the BLM protestors were not "attacked" for anything they said
They were attacked because they wanted to stop people from listening to the person they want ...NOBODY HAS THAT RIGHT...ever
the fukked up part is you would be the same one complaining if people did the same thing to someone you support
So call the cops.
You're still wrong. Keep digging
Your lost? This broad since I assume you want us to vote Democrat has TWO PENDING FBI Investigations. Every leadership role she had she fukked up something. Also, she destabilized Libya, Syria, Honduras, and everything else she was involved in. Under the Clinton's mass-incarcerations. Anything else you "LOST" about kind-sir?
I bet you sitting there thinking you are dropping some serious science.
While you worried about email addresses and foreign countries, your boy Trump will have YOU fukced up right here in your own country.
You, your neighbors, your family. He would push y'all all off a boat if he could.
Also: logic is not your thing.
Neither is reading comprehension.
I was suggesting that you are the one who is lost. Look at what you wrote again. You suggested I was lost.
Google the "pot"/"kettle" thing since you weren't able to grasp the meaning.
Point is, were screwed with both. It just determines who's the less hawkish. That's the point I'm trying to get across to you.
Why am i not suprised you cant give a straight answer to a simple question?60 years of liberal schools has made it tough to find Negros who know how to reason....and saying someone is wrong doesnt = a logical argument ....thats what angry girlfriends say when they have nothing reasonable left to say
Typo on my behalf
and saying someone is wrong doesnt = a logical argument ....thats what angry girlfriends say when they have nothing reasonable left to say
There's nothing more to say. Reread the other stuff I wrote if you missed it the first time.
NO ONE
HAS
THE
RIGHT
TO
PHYSICALLY
ATTACK
ANOTHER
Seems pretty easy to me, but I have to remember that IQs vary.
And you really think the difference is that I don't understand what you wrote.
That's not the problem. No need to keep repeating yourself.
I reat it. It's wrong.
Only thing you got right so far is "IQs vary""No one has the right to physically attack another" Really???So if your walking with your woman and i come offer her $5 to blow me in foul language in front of your children you wont do anything about it? (Feel free to dodge that question too like all the others )
Guess your wrong again..if you run around crashing private parties yelling and spitting in peoples faces they will hit you and get acquitted
You fail to see THEY WENT OUT OF LINE FIRST....and once you initiate violent confrontation you are not a victim anymore..the burden of behaving yourself lies on everybody
seems pretty easy to me