Mountain
All Star
There's nothing logical about this, I don't know why men repeat it so much. The very fact that its as easy as it is for women is the reason why women's numbers are generally higher. Its a cause and effect thing.
I doubt you know that "women's numbers are generally higher", but if you do, provide a reference to the source of your claim.
But when men have a lot of numbers, to me it shows a serious character flaw. That means they are actively out there soliciting and trying their hardest to bed as many women as possible. That could signify insecurity or downright untrustworthiness in their character (therefore, not relationship material or worth taking seriously).
So what? I wasn't talking about you in specific. I stated that societies tend to respect "ladies men" whilst chastising "sluts" and provided reasons as of why this is the case. I don’t see how your supposed preference alone is of any relevance here.
As far as evolutionary psychology goes, I really hate when people speak about things they have no idea about. In terms of evolutionary psychology it has always been advantageous for females to have multiple partners, always. The same for men.
As a species our ultimate purpose is to propagate our genetics through reproduction, so copulating with multiple partners is advantageous for both men and women in a sense, but that doesn't change the fact that doing so is more risky for women than it is for men, in fact, if you know anything about “evolutionary psychology” you would understand this to be the foundation of Bateman’s Principle.
The scientific community readily acknowledges that promiscuous activity, or producing multiple offspring, is a lot more risky for women than that it is for men due to two obvious reasons: 1) Birth risk; Child birth is not "risk free", child birth may cause death, the more births a woman is subjected to the larger her risk of dying due to giving birth becomes, men are not subjected to this risk 2) Females of all species, including ours, require additional resources in order to successfully incubate a child during pregnancy, pregnancy literally costs women massive amounts of resources and is very stressful physically/mentally, again, this is a cost we as men are not subjected to. There are plenty more points I could state but I want to keep this very brief.
What you need to realize is that semi-effective forms of contraception were not available until very recently in human history, so the risks above were discounted through evolutionary pressures. In other words; Women have always stood a lot more to lose through copulation than men, and because of this females naturally developed a very "picky" sexual selective attitude during the early stages our evolutionary history that is still apparent today.







pushing 4?



.... 