What’s up with these BW twitter c00ns and erasing the whole concept of race?

[Gravity]

Doll Test - post Obama :wow:
http://www.theroot.com/the-doll-test-for-racial-self-hate-did-it-ever-make-se-1790875716

From your own link:

The modern method of assessing attitudes on race is the Implicit Association Test, or IAT, which tests unconscious bias. According to a recent study, 70 percent of whites have an anti-black bias, as do 50 percent of blacks, says Asrat.

So how do those results differ from the original "doll test" results that started decades ago? 50% of blacks have an anti-black bias? Do you even comprehend what that means?

 

[Kenny West]

That is scientifically untrue....

Babies show racial bias...

Racial bias is reduced when young children interact with other races...
http://nypost.com/2017/04/13/your-baby-is-a-little-bit-racist-science-says/
Your Baby is a Racist—and You Don't Necessarily Have to Sweat that Fact

Can nikkas on this forum stop posting singular studies that they barely understand and waving them around as the consensus for science?

Like the first study is determining racism from visual cues of how long 1 baby watches an individual of one race over another, ignoring the idea that it's logical to assume a baby would take visual cues from someone more closely resembling their parents. Same thing could factor in the 2nd study. These folks haven't worked through their control variables yet, don't read too far into this shyt.

 

[It is a mystery]

From your own link:

The modern method of assessing attitudes on race is the Implicit Association Test, or IAT, which tests unconscious bias. According to a recent study, 70 percent of whites have an anti-black bias, as do 50 percent of blacks, says Asrat.

So how do those results differ from the original "doll test" results that started decades ago? 50% of blacks have an anti-black bias? Do you even comprehend what that means?

The data in the first result is not the same as the data in the second result. The second link also proves why the test is weak in the first place

 

[Gravity]

The data in the first result is not the same as the data in the second result. The second link also proves why the test is weak in the first place

The children in the modern test that you linked were clearly older than the kids in the first doll test 60 years ago, so the comparison is invalid.

You're being obtuse to dodge the point. The point that the original doll test illustrates is that blacks are conditioned to have a negative view of themselves in this society starting from a very very young age. The modern day version of the tests illustrate the same point. Blacks are still being conditioned to have a negative view of themselves in this society. Even the new test says that 50% of blacks have an anti-black mentality. That's absolutely sad and it doesn't need to be blown off or excused.