There are 101 men for every 100 women on Google Earth. So all it would take is for polygamists to marry 2 women for half the male population to be assed out. And of course men with means would not stop at 2, making it even worse, as we have seen time and time again across the world. You might have a quarter of the male population with all the women or even less. Then what? Yes it is that bad breh, it's simple math.
What's wrong with polygamy again?
- Thread starter Micky Mikey
- Start date
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
that red.pill bs that palebone/pinktoe nikkas spit is not for the real ones
quit that bs
being solid and excelling at the necessary things is the first step
it's babyboy shyte to still have your ego tied up in tryna control a woman and police her sexuality
put the puzzy and all that freakiness last
put self-perfection first and lo and behold you find yourself women ready to feed that appetite
really it's just the tears of sucker nikkas who want the things only a king earns
you know that's not the position you were born to inhabit
& because they ain't born for the throne & crown they become agents of chaos and discord
be clear i peep all the fukkery and just know you could never touch the real
being a fukkboy only gonna earn you l's in life
it's a cycle these fraud ass motherfukkers leading women and children into patterns of perpetual degradation
y'all the opps and my hate for y'all is righteous
if you feel some type of way about this post then you a lollipop.licker and you ain't valid
*
quit that bs
being solid and excelling at the necessary things is the first step
it's babyboy shyte to still have your ego tied up in tryna control a woman and police her sexuality
put the puzzy and all that freakiness last
put self-perfection first and lo and behold you find yourself women ready to feed that appetite
really it's just the tears of sucker nikkas who want the things only a king earns
you know that's not the position you were born to inhabit
& because they ain't born for the throne & crown they become agents of chaos and discord
be clear i peep all the fukkery and just know you could never touch the real
being a fukkboy only gonna earn you l's in life
it's a cycle these fraud ass motherfukkers leading women and children into patterns of perpetual degradation
y'all the opps and my hate for y'all is righteous
if you feel some type of way about this post then you a lollipop.licker and you ain't valid
*
Contrefaire
Superstar
In America, the gender ratios are just about even. In fact, globally they're near even as well.
But you don't need to have gender inequality on the level of China to feel a similar pain in polygamist societies. If one man marries 5 women you'd already be assed out. If 5 men marry 20 women you'd be totally fukked.
Why is it that in these types of discussions, almost every man feels like he would NEVER be the MF'er caught in a drought when reality shows most can't even get three women simultaneously to want to fukk them, let alone marry and share them.
And also, what makes some of y'all think the upper echelons of men (i.e., the rich, charismatic, tall and attractive) wouldn't amass dozens of wives, just because they could? Imagine if every baller in the NLF/NBA/MLB suddenly decided fukk it, I need 30 wives? And he could support them all? Where the fukk does that leave the average man?
Last edited:
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
I've watched many shows and documentaries on polygamy. Those people are miserable. Everyone saying men are fantasizing about orgies is spot on. That is NOT polygamy. The man has to be emotionally fulfilling to multiple women, and rotate between them, which is impossible. You also have to be in the middle when the women have issues with each other, and the women always have issues with each other. The women claim they view all the children as their own, but obviously favor their bio children more than the other wives' children. The father can't provide all the children enough individual attention. The children have to be careful not to address the other wives as mother. They have to publically call them aunts, and some can't claim their own father out of fear of him being arrested. Those people are practicing a religion that requires them to live plural marriage for the purpose of getting into heaven, so they can have as many people on their personal planet in heaven. That is what they believe. Men who want multiple sex partners with no religious requirement have no business living this way.
It’s far more complicated than you are stating, in this society where normal marriages don’t last, think that a man can keep two women contempt and accept such a situation. Also the type of polygamy I’m defending is one which has regimented rules.. most men would be disqualified because they would have the means or be able to treat all of them equally. Also there is a 4 wife limit.
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
And in a lot of those fundamentalist polygamist groups, you have a lot of young men who don't get wives, since all the men in the community are competing for the same pool of women, and an even bigger problem of the oldest son being closer in age to the youngest wife, and the father fearing his younger more attractive son is going to steal her. They get kicked out of the community, and have a hard time adjusting in the outside world from which they've been sheltered.
Couple this with the fact that "dating/marriage" would become 100% material based since a woman really wouldn't be able to get the emotional support/friendship/close bond that monogamous relationships can provide.
Goat poster
KANG LIFE
Truehttps://www.economist.com/news/chri...begets-violence-link-between-polygamy-and-war
Polygamy = civil war
Plus op are you ready to financially support all those wives? That's the only reason they do it
To add to this... there are also examples like this with Polygamous areas of the US, like Warren Jeffs Morman offshoot that cast out all young boys as soon as they were like 16 just so the elder men could marry 4 and 5 young wife’s.
Unless you have the funds you don't want those problems that come with polygamy
hu3ypdadon
All Star
Last edited:
sigh 
Polygamy ain't about having threesomes bruh
I have no prob with polygamy, but conversations in an american context usually spiral out of control because...
1. Women assume you are talking about harem type shyt when it's brought up
2. Men think of dumb shyt like threesomes
As a result nothing productive comes of the conversation. Unfortunately the men responsible enough to practice polygamy are not typically the ones to bring up the practice. It's usually dusty dudes looking for a way to legitimize their fukkery. My position is that one person should come from a family that practice polygamy just like I believe ideally at least one person should come from a two parent household in a monogamous marriage. Otherwise you lack reference for any kind of reasonable protocol.
Polygamy ain't about having threesomes bruh
I have no prob with polygamy, but conversations in an american context usually spiral out of control because...
1. Women assume you are talking about harem type shyt when it's brought up
2. Men think of dumb shyt like threesomes
As a result nothing productive comes of the conversation. Unfortunately the men responsible enough to practice polygamy are not typically the ones to bring up the practice. It's usually dusty dudes looking for a way to legitimize their fukkery. My position is that one person should come from a family that practice polygamy just like I believe ideally at least one person should come from a two parent household in a monogamous marriage. Otherwise you lack reference for any kind of reasonable protocol.
Contrefaire
Superstar
1) So, in your mind, only SOME (see: few) men would be let into this prestigious plural marriage club? On top of that, what's the point of a 4 wife cap? If you're going to exist in a society where a man can have multiple wives, what's the point in setting a limit? Who does that help and why would anyone abide by it?
And also, if your requirements are that ONLY certain qualified men are allowed to practice polygamy, what is to stop the wifeless, disenfranchised set from rising up? Hell, what's stopping the affluent men with 4 wives who want a 5th from disobeying such loose doctrine?
2) Your ideal society would be one in which only SOME men are allowed to practice polygamy (to an extent, of course) and all without any sort of religious doctrine tied to it. How does that work?
3) If it's "far more complicated" that people realize, tf is the point? Why the fukk would ANYONE, let alone a majority of
Nothing wrong with it if u can pull it off
If I was rich id have a compound with 10 baby mommas of every race
But since im broke ill stick with a main girl and a side chick and call it a day
If I was rich id have a compound with 10 baby mommas of every race
But since im broke ill stick with a main girl and a side chick and call it a day
Contrefaire
Superstar
This happens with FLDS Mormons all the time.
So I'm curious to know what makes anyone think that somehow, in some near future scenario, the very same thing wouldn't occur tenfold if we all collectively went that route. Because they talk like they have all the answers.
nothing wrong with it, if you can deal with more than 1 woman
i'm too old and tired to deal with 1 woman and her mouth and now add another 1 or more to the mix
that's like being a first time dog owner of a pit bull and u add 2 more vicious pit bulls, you'll kill yourself before they kill you
i'm too old and tired to deal with 1 woman and her mouth and now add another 1 or more to the mix
that's like being a first time dog owner of a pit bull and u add 2 more vicious pit bulls, you'll kill yourself before they kill you