What's wrong with polygamy again?

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Single women raising kids without men in their lives is destroying the black community. Maintenance of family structures is the only way to salvage that.

It seems you're acting dense on purpose. Take your feelings out of it and try and understand the question.

You need to actually do the research. Most BM are in their children's lives. Plual marriage is just co parenting that restricts the relationship potential for a woman. Having a man running in and out of a home and having limited time for his child is not any more stable than what is already happening.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

If a Maasai man wished to avail himself of the matrimonial benefits of his mate’s wife, all he needed to do was call on her while the husband was out, plant his spear outside her hut, and the woman would be his for the night as long as the spear stood its ground. If the husband happened to come home while the spear was still erect (no pun intended, but the English ought to broaden their vocabulary), he would understand and move on to another mate’s hut and “do likewise”. And so it went, or perhaps still goes. We would have confirmed this with Ferdinand Waitutu, who in his defence to the charge of hate speech against the Maasai, now claims to be one himself, but we do not have his number. Perhaps we should look at last week’s news of two men in Mombasa who signed a peace, love and unity pact in relation to their mutual feelings of affection towards the same woman in this context. (We never knew we would use the Nyayo Philosophy one day). It was reported that the two men engaged in a physical fight when they discovered that for at least four years they unknowingly shared the society and service of the same woman. After the fight came the pact. The two men voluntarily agreed to share the woman, to harbour no jealousy towards each other in relation to her, and to respect an agreed weekly roster through which husbandly duties (and all the rights attached thereto) would be performed.
Read more at: Of polyandry and related matters...


For instance, both polygamy and polyandry are common marital practices within the group. Women are allowed to marry more than one person within their age group, and even choose whatever partner they want.

Holding on to Culture in a Changing World: The Maasai - Face2Face Africa

So we still fukking with our African ancestor's systems or nah?

Get um. These dude keep trying to make their promiscuity righteous.

 

[Swagnificent]

Yup. Modern marriage was created by religious Europeans-- homosexual and pedophile. Gays champion monogamy because it restricts the libido of a man when he focuses on one woman at a time.



Nope, because it takes a woman 9 months to bare a child. Promiscuity is not possible without technology and social structure.

Exactly.

These feminists and fakkits want us to believe women are just as promiscuous as men naturally. That is a lie. Its social conditioning that has made them that way. Women evolved to want a single male that will provide and take care of them during child birth and child rearing. They are naturally drawn to providers. And they are not fazed naturally by being in a polygamous relationship.

In fact our evolution DEMANDS polygyny. What we are doing right now by encouraging monogamy is going against our NATURE.

 

[Swagnificent]

And? It's not as simple as a man nuts in a women and she's instantly pregnant. You want the strongest and best sperm possible but she has the best chance of getting pregnant when she's ovulating. You'd want her to get nutted in as much as possible to raise the likelihood of pregnancy to happen.

And just because it takes 9 months for a woman to bear a child doesn't mean women can't have sex while being pregnant so why isn't promiscuity possible? It's like you're looking at one part of biology and making a lot of assumptions about it.

Show me your PHD in Biology or something because I don't think you know what you're talking about.

That's like asking a man why he ain't gonna have sex after nutting 5 times in a bytch. Breh once the deed is done sex isn't necessarily. Sex is all about function. AKA making kids.

Once a bytch is pregnant she has no evolutionary motivation to be promiscuous. That's just new age bullshyt spread by feminists who want to encourage dangerous behavior on women.

 

[Swagnificent]

Men naturally aren't attracted to loose women or women that have already been conquered. Sleeping with a pregnant woman (by another man) is frowned upon and rarely done. In old times it was considered homosexual to be attracted to a whore. If a man has to chose he's going to go with the woman with little to no bodycount.



Yet you ask for me to validate facts with a cac doctorine. Hilarious.

Exactly. This is why virgin women are always the most desired.

No man wants to stick his dikk in a hole other nikkas have cum in.

 

[Black Magisterialness]

Nothing is wrong with it inherently...if all parties know whats good and agree on it, I don't see the issue with it...its just not for me.

 

[Swagnificent]

More women than men have added their DNA to the human gene pool

8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

Great links. I said these earlier.

We are products of polygyny. One man and multiple women are our forebearers.

Its NATURAL. Its in our BIOLOGY. Its in our DNA.

 

[Swagnificent]

That's a fukking hell of a reach.

Most of the violence in those areas is due to religion, not polygamy.

Or better yet poverty because white supremacists are stealing resources from the country and forcing them into perpetual debt servitude via the World Bank or IMF.

 

[Swagnificent]

If a Maasai man wished to avail himself of the matrimonial benefits of his mate’s wife, all he needed to do was call on her while the husband was out, plant his spear outside her hut, and the woman would be his for the night as long as the spear stood its ground. If the husband happened to come home while the spear was still erect (no pun intended, but the English ought to broaden their vocabulary), he would understand and move on to another mate’s hut and “do likewise”. And so it went, or perhaps still goes. We would have confirmed this with Ferdinand Waitutu, who in his defence to the charge of hate speech against the Maasai, now claims to be one himself, but we do not have his number. Perhaps we should look at last week’s news of two men in Mombasa who signed a peace, love and unity pact in relation to their mutual feelings of affection towards the same woman in this context. (We never knew we would use the Nyayo Philosophy one day). It was reported that the two men engaged in a physical fight when they discovered that for at least four years they unknowingly shared the society and service of the same woman. After the fight came the pact. The two men voluntarily agreed to share the woman, to harbour no jealousy towards each other in relation to her, and to respect an agreed weekly roster through which husbandly duties (and all the rights attached thereto) would be performed.
Read more at: Of polyandry and related matters...


For instance, both polygamy and polyandry are common marital practices within the group. Women are allowed to marry more than one person within their age group, and even choose whatever partner they want.

Holding on to Culture in a Changing World: The Maasai - Face2Face Africa

So we still fukking with our African ancestor's systems or nah?

You basically just cited why polyandry is not common. If men find out they are sharing the same woman they will fight. Those two nikkas are just pussies for signing a peace treaty. I never said multiple men wouldn't desire the same woman. Its just that it would almost always lead to fights. One would have to kill the other. There is no society that ENCOURAGES polyandry. NONE. If it happens like in this example it just leads to men fighting.

Women on the other hand can't fight each if they both want one man because that one man is gonna be able to stop them and get them to agree to be together with him in a polygamous relationship.

Once again read up on "sexual dimorphism" as I stated earlier. You basically told us here why polygyny is more common in human society than polyandry. If women were physically capable of stopping two men who want to fight over them then we would be like Lemurs and living in a world of polyandry. But we don't because men are on average physically bigger than women and are typically able to sort it out among themselves who gets to mate with the female. What you cited was an outlier example of two pussies who couldn't fight it out for the chick but rather agreed like bytches to share a female.

The only men who can peacefully share the same female are brothers. And even in that case its rare.

 

[hu3ypdadon]

@Swagnificent Amazing Job breh. I would rep you if I could..Nothin but truth comin from you in thread

 

[Doomsday]

I'm not assuming anything. Ur the one who claimed men don't want what other men desire which is false. That's why IG hoes exist and eat so well. Men want what other men want.

Pretty women will get attention. That's not saying anything.

There is a fundamental difference between a group of men being in agreement of a good looking woman and wanting a woman who is loose. IG hoes eat well? Where is your proof of this? Didn't someone who did club promotion on this very forum expose that IG chicks don't fill venues? And it's been proven that the majority of them have fake followers. You're assuming because a woman is on IG with a lot of followers that she's rich and living the life. Draya is one of the most popular girls on IG all time and she's struggling to get by. Bria Myles is struggling. Name this girls who were nobodies before IG and now they're rich?

I'll wait.

Men do not want to wife women who have a reputation for being loose. Just ask Mya.

All of that is just babble. People asking you for benefits b/c nobody does anything for nothing.

And yet...

People are unhappy b/c they are trying to find themselves.

You prove my point by stating this.

Women have been brainwashed by the media into playing a mans role and now they are unhappy. Women can only be fully happy following protocol.

Most women I know outside of a few blips here and there are very happy and want to protect their way of life while striving for even better.

The only women who want things to continue the way it is are lesbians.

But none of that is even relevant b/c you can't answer any questions. How will sharing a man's dikk and dividing resources in one household with several other mouths to feed make a woman happy? If you don't have a way to answer that, that's fine, just think about it and get back at me, k? Otherwise ur just setting men up to be completely ignored or taken thru the ringer by multiple women.

I answered that multiple times but it's not the skitzophrenic lesbian answer you're looking for.

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

That's only because we evolved to find the same attributes attractive.

You are arguing that there is something about having other men desire your woman that motivates men. That couldn't be further from the truth. If nobody on earth other than me found Ashley Graham attractive I would be ecstatic. Some are already saying she's too fat right now. But I wouldn't give a fukk if everyone else found her unattractive cause I find her to be fine as fukk. And I would enjoy having sex with her.

Men are not driven by petty shyt like women. Its women that are always competing against one another over irrelevant shyt. Men only compete over tangible things that have meaning. We don't want our woman to be desired simply for the sake of other men looking at her enviously when we walk by.

We just want a woman who we find to be attractive. PERIOD. And the less men that agree the better cause it means less competition for that fine female.

Men are just as petty as women if not more so when it comes to women. All the references ya'll make to "steal ur chick", men going to war over Helen of Troy. Stop. Men beef over the same p*ssy so much that I've heard other men say THEY don't even understand it. You guys thrive in competition. You don't avoid it. And you want unmitigated access to the same desirable females that everyone else wants b/c that's a marker of ur dominance. And you want access to others as well. That's just biology.
The motivation comes from biological attraction and showing other males u dominate.

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

Very few is better than NONE. Right now there is an epidemic of black women not getting married. So we gotta start somewhere. You got to think that after a few generations of successful polygamous marriages that we will have more successful black men ready to take on even more sistas.

Is there an epidemic of black women not getting married? I didn't know this. I thought most blk women by the time they were 55 were married at similar rates as non-blk women and in some states they were married at higher rates.

The Top 4 Myths About Black Marriage

I swear everybody love the scare tactics when it comes to blk women. We gotta get more informed about our community.

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

Polygamy aint the wave..

But I think more people need to be honest with themselves and not marry especially when they know they are gonna crave sex from more than one person.

I think most dudes have no problem with bei g single forever...women be lying to themselves because they just want to get married for the title and status yet know damn well they be lusting for dikk from another guy.

 

[Lotsford]

Nikah Ijtimah - Wikipedia

there were four types of marriage during the ancient Arab period. One ... type of marriage was that a group of less than ten men would assemble and enter upon a woman, and all of them would have sexual relations with her. If she became pregnant and delivered a child and some days had passed after her delivery, she would send for all of them and none of them could refuse to come, and when they all gathered before her she would say to them "You (all) know what you have done and now I have given birth to a child. So it is your child O so and so!" Naming whoever she liked and her child would follow him and he could not refuse to take him.[1]

Y'all bouta fukk the game up for everybody being greedy smh.

You basically just cited why polyandry is not common. If men find out they are sharing the same woman they will fight. Those two nikkas are just pussies for signing a peace treaty. I never said multiple men wouldn't desire the same woman. Its just that it would almost always lead to fights. One would have to kill the other. There is no society that ENCOURAGES polyandry. NONE. If it happens like in this example it just leads to men fighting.

Women on the other hand can't fight each if they both want one man because that one man is gonna be able to stop them and get them to agree to be together with him in a polygamous relationship.

Once again read up on "sexual dimorphism" as I stated earlier. You basically told us here why polygyny is more common in human society than polyandry. If women were physically capable of stopping two men who want to fight over them then we would be like Lemurs and living in a world of polyandry. But we don't because men are on average physically bigger than women and are typically able to sort it out among themselves who gets to mate with the female. What you cited was an outlier example of two pussies who couldn't fight it out for the chick but rather agreed like bytches to share a female.

The only men who can peacefully share the same female are brothers. And even in that case its rare.

You may think it's p*ssy but the Massai for centuries clearly don't agree.


Of the 1,231 societies listed in the 1980 Ethnographic Atlas, 186 were found to be monogamous; 453 had occasional polygyny; 588 had more frequent polygyny; and 4 had polyandry.[3] Polyandry is less rare than this figure which listed only those examples found in the Himalayan mountains (28 societies). More recent studies have found more than 50 other societies practicing polyandry.[4]



Polyandrous behavior is quite widespread in the animal kingdom. It is prominent in many species of insects and fish (for example pipefish; see Polyandry in fish). It is also found in other animals such as birds (for example dunnocks), whales, and in some mammals such as house mouse.

Among the whales, polyandrous behavior has been noted among the bowhead,[75] harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena),[76] and humpback whales.[77]

Among the relevant insect species are the honeybees, the red flour beetle, the species of spider Stegodyphus lineatus, the crickets Gryllus bimaculatus, and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Polyandry also occurs in some primates such as marmosets, and in the marsupial genus' Antechinus.



Polyandry - Wikipedia

To say Polyandary is not "natural" doesn't stack up. Maybe it's not as common, but it always has existed.


there were four types of marriage during the ancient Arab period. One ... type of marriage was that a group of less than ten men would assemble and enter upon a woman, and all of them would have sexual relations with her. If she became pregnant and delivered a child and some days had passed after her delivery, she would send for all of them and none of them could refuse to come, and when they all gathered before her she would say to them "You (all) know what you have done and now I have given birth to a child. So it is your child O so and so!" Naming whoever she liked and her child would follow him and he could not refuse to take him.[1]


Nikah Ijtimah - Wikipedia