When did this biracial thing actually start to kick in ??

Razor Reader

Formerly -----
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Messages
1,768
Reputation
-305
Daps
3,899
Reppin
Game, Prosperity and Good Fortune
So now I'm foreign/ Non-black because I don't let outdated racist cac laws affect my view on biracials:martin:

You still not comprehending what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that or mixed people being seen as black is a clear and defined part of black American history. This biracial stuff is new and somewhat confusing. They're would be no Black America as we know it today if makes people are not defined as black.
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,053
Daps
59,387
Frederick Douglass was seen as black? Halle Berry seen as black? I think it depends on what they look like.

Not really look at some of the people from the past that was biracial some of them looked just white but was seen as black. The whole birical thing did not start until Obama’s and liberal cacs wanting to dbdh 100+ years of history
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,529
Reputation
6,071
Daps
145,079
They have white parents (I'm including grandparents), and whether they admit it or not; that typically means they have advantages over me (two black parents)

They want to be accepted socially without acknowledging the reality of their "white side"

What rights are "biracials" being denied though ? And if they just claim black is no telling what they can accomplish. Just sayin'...

Here's a post I've seen from someone on my timeline a few weeks ago...

"Saw a post and got me to thinking...Obama, Megan Markle, Tiger, J. Cole, Halle Berry, Drake and this list goes on... why do they have to be the first black person to do something and not the first biracial or mixed? Don't give me well that's how white people see it, cause that's how black people do us too. I like to see me people that represent me too and me fully...a mixed person."

:francis:

I feel like there a lot of mixed black people that have an internal conflict with how society identifies them. My whole problem is that... a lot of mixed people want it both ways. They'll be "black" when it's convenient and "biracial" when they want to separate from black people.

A lot of the mixed people I've known from childhood or just people I've met over the years seem to have some type of insecurity issues, not sure what it is, but it's something to it.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2017
Messages
482
Reputation
270
Daps
4,218
You still not comprehending what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that or mixed people being seen as black is a clear and defined part of black American history. This biracial stuff is new and somewhat confusing. They're would be no Black America as we know it today if makes people are not defined as black.
I'm aware of that, but to call them only black is incorrect. They are black, but they also have a non-black parent. It might be ingrained in history to call them black but many modern biracials are steering away from that label. You can argue whether or not that's a good or bad thing. I don't really care about what they call themselves personally.

Historically speaking, they were black. But that was then, this is now. If they don't want to be under our umbrella, I'm not gonna force them to stay.
Let me guess your from the United Kingdom:beli:.
:youngsabo:Nope
 

Wear My Dawg's Hat

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,532
Reputation
1,950
Daps
15,034
Reppin
The Land That Time Forgot
Prior to the dismantling of Jim Crow, segregation and anti-miscegenation (racial inter-marriage) laws
in most of the country, the "one-drop of African makes you colored/Negro" rule was applied and
brutally ENFORCED.

Homer Plessy by bloodline was about 88 percent white European and 12 percent black. He purposely
challenged Jim Crow in 1892 and his court case was denied by the Supreme Court, which led to legal racial restrictions being upheld until Brown v Board of Education in 1954.
homer-plessy.jpg


Homer Plessy has been dead almost 100 years. But his work, and the work of others over decades removed legal Jim Crow and segregation from the society.

He helped end the laws that in the past would have forced him to be considered colored/Negro/black.

Plessy could call himself "black" or "African-American" today, but what exactly would that mean in 2018? That he couldn't fly first class on Southwest Airlines? That he couldn't live in the Buckhead section of Atlanta? That he couldn't attend Duke University? That he couldn't marry Gwyneth Paltrow? That he couldn't be president of the United States?

In 2018, he also would most likely viewed as "white" by the many darker non-white immigrants groups who
did not live in the country in large numbers in the late 19th century (from India, Mexico, Armenia,) as they do
today.

In 2018, Homer Plessy would probably have a lot in common with Meghan Markle.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
1,646
Reputation
-40
Daps
9,779
I mean for real when I was growing up in Philly if you was light and bright then you would just a light skinned black person.

Even if you have blondish hair or green eyes whatever you would just a "light skinned" black person.

Sometimes, years later I will find out that people had one white parent or one Latino parent or something like that and I never knew it.

I didn't start hearing about biracial still about 10 or maybe 15 years ago.

When did this lightskinned black people transform into this new category called biracials??

The problem with people like you is that you define "black" by how "woke" the person is.

Being black is simply biological. Not a socio-political affiliation.

Frederick Douglass is not "blacker" than clarence thomas, just because he is more "woke"
 
Top