NoChillJones
Banned
1. Testimony isn't the end all be all in a court case. There's also an investigation into whether the testifiers words are credible. There's forensics at the scene to show how it relates beyond a reasonable doubt. No one is taking their words as concrete. My point in asking what proof is, is that it seems like you consider a testimony as the only proof you need.
2. This whole bullet point is just you jumping to conclusions. People lie about their enemies all the time. Not to mention, it was written in an ancient time when people didn't understand much
3. Your jumping to conclusions again. Just because you can determine who wrote it, that doesn't mean its all true, even if there are some facts to the story. If some future generation comes to a human-less Earth & find a Harry Potter book. They too might think we got wizards & shyt because there's some actual places/events mentioned in the book.
We have archaeological evidence of a sea parting? We have archaeological evidence of a man coming back to life? Archaeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture; I'm not sure if those are questions archaeology can even answer.
4. (a) What is information if it can't be tested & observed?
(b) Fair enough, I don't much about junk DNA. I do know, we have a ton of DNA that is no longer necessary for a modern day human, but since evolution isn't an intelligent process, we just keep it all. Research vestigiality
(c) You can believe in a creator of the universe, without believing this creator directly created man; tons of people feel this way.
Once again, just because science doesn't have it all figured out, that doesn't mean that its evidence for god. 100 years ago, science didn't have flight figured out, but now we got there.
Why wouldn't a deleterious mutation be weeded out, its deleterious?A favorable mutation would propagate. If a bird is born with a 3rd wing & it can't fly straight, its not gonna be spreading its DNA....because its gonna die
5. You said heritable genes are obviously passed down. So when did this passing of genes start? Are you against all forms of evolution or just human?
Dude is the equivalent of talking to one of those flat earth idiots. They have all these links and studies and charts and breakdown of why earth is flat..but when its all said and done..it comes down to one very simple aspect.
COMMON fukkING SENSE....Dude is a Jesus freak who studies the science of anti science while at the same time studying the Science of Pro Christianity.
He can roll out this nonsense to support false positives( his ridiculous claim that the red sea splitting actually occurred) while conveniently ignoring all the overwhelming proof of sub species if humans...other dominant nonhuman species...time lined that dont correlate with the Bible.etc...
But like I said when he getd done..none of it resonates on a plane of reality in this world as we..that being Man knows it.
Why? Because its not physically possible...not evem in the slightest. There is no way entire Oceam of water cam instantly split apart. Even if it were possible.THE ASPECT OF INSTANTANEOUS IS NOT REALITY for a body of water that massive.
Bi
A favorable mutation would propagate. If a bird is born with a 3rd wing & it can't fly straight, its not gonna be spreading its DNA....because its gonna die 

..this crack pot ass nikka is the reaon fanatical Christians are looked at as idiots
When have we ever seen any water part that way, let alone an entire sea 



Correlation does not equal causation. You should have learned this in middle school.

