Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
You can't say "Bu...bu...but his team is so bad" when he chose the team AND played a part in them being this bad. You can't just overlook it because it's inconvenient.

What you're saying doesn't add up. If he extorted Dolan and said he only signing if he builds a John Lucas III, Tony Snell, Andrew Nicholson and Kendrick Perkins team around him - he'd still be a top 10 player. What blame you hold in the makeup of a team, has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with your ability as a player(or where you should be ranked). All these off-the-court decisions really don't mean shyt, other than dude didn't make the best of choices for putting himself in a winning situation - that's all.
Please don't tell me you think the Knicks are comparable to the Nets, in terms of overall talent.......I am plainly stating that teams that have comparable or less talent and don't have a "top 10 player" are doing as well or better.
If that was all that really mattered then the Knicks wouldn't be as bad as they are.

If we are talking about any other players being there, the amount of money they make and how they got there would have to be taken into account as well.
If you seriously think that has any say in the equation....... there's nothing else I can really say to you. We don't rank players in terms of their salary to ability/production ratio, we rank them by exactly how good they are.
. Do they have a top 10 player? Do the Lakers? Do the C's? Pistons? Yet all these teams have a comparable or better record than the Knicks. Like I said you forfeit top 10 consideration when you can't even get in the playoffs in this putrid east.


There is no excuse for a "top 10 player" missing the playoffs let alone winning at a 33% or worse clip in a historically weak conference especially when they chose that situation. If the shoe fits
.
. Blake on the Knicks right now would be worse this season.