Which State wins the War?

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

1. Nothing on the coasts wins without allies. With no way to get supplies in the coasts would get hit HARD by a lack of foodstuffs and manufacturing from the midwest and south. Remember what California and TX produce mostly doesn't hold as much value in a total war.
2. Depending on how long the fight goes on, water becomes important. If CA loses access to fresh water they all die. If im fighting CA...that's the first thing I would do.
3. The North East and Rust Belt might join forces. Mostly because trying to fight people like the Michigan Militia, in the winter is a mistake.
4. TX is one of the ONLY states that actually has enough of just about everything to be self-sustaining. However, its so BIG that deploying troops would take so long that a small insurgent group could take say, Houston with little resistance if it came from within.
5. The south would actually be REALLY hard to fight because of the sheer weirdness of the terrain. Its mountains and swamps and rivers and woods. And if you were the south that's where you would fight.

In the end it actually would be who gets supplies from Canada or other countries and who controls the massive food source in the middle of the country. I'd put my money on TX or the NE if the Industrial Midwest joined them. I think both CA and the South would cannibalize themselves. Most black people in the south wouldn't fight for "the South" and CA is more politically divided than people think it is.

Deploying would be tough but you have planes to move people around.

AND

TX can easily lock the country down by controlling the oil. Take over Louisiana and lock the Gulf and oil down even further. In this fight, there's no outside interference from other countries.....so no Saudi Arabian oil. The states can only use what is in the U.S. Other nations have zero involvement.

TX would be smart to lock the Plains down and put a stranglehold on food. Leave the South alone since the NE/Mid-Atlantic will probably try engage them first (potentially a BIG mistake).

West has great natural defenses but would struggle to mount an offensive attack since they have A LOT of land but comparatively few people to defend it. They're better off just sitting and waiting and letting whoever wins East of the Rockies to come to them.

 

[ignorethis]

NC wins. High population but not pussified like Cali or unfamiliar with guns like NY. Farmlands instead of desert like Texas. Factories galore. Plus they make most of the Tobacco products. Have ya girl turning traitor and sucking dikk for a pack of Newport 100’s. Big military bases.
They can defend from the water n maybe form a uneasy alliance with SC/VA.

lol texas has more farmland than NC
the deserts just were we get our oil from and keep the nukes.

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

The answer is Texas. Come on brehs

Yep. There's no outside help from other countries and Texas controls the oil.

Everyone's plans sound good until they realize that movement will be difficult without fuel. That could work against TX since everyone might try to attack at once but due to TX size....most states would have to commit A LOT of people to beating TX.

Nobody wants to be fighting in the swamps and backwoods of East and Southeast TX.

 

[GreenGhxst]

Texas, its a no brainer

 

[tuckgod]

New york will get on some roman empire shyt

get all the east coast states to become one army. And ride on the rest of the country

united states of the holy new york empire complete

All we gotta do is cut off y’all food supply.

Y’all import everything.

They close all the bridges and tunnels and y’all will be eating each other in a week.

 

[K.O.N.Y]

All we gotta do is cut off y’all food supply.

Y’all import everything.

They close all the bridges and tunnels and y’all will be eating each other in a week.

We got upstate New York and Canada
We’ll be just fine

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Wouldn’t make it past the Smokey’s

There was already a civil war with a clear winner. Not sure why people on the L side have all this confidence lol

 

[UberEatsDriver]

All we gotta do is cut off y’all food supply.

Y’all import everything.

They close all the bridges and tunnels and y’all will be eating each other in a week.

by looking at this comment it’s as if upstate NY is just Alice in wonderland

 

[UberEatsDriver]

The richest states would win while the poorest states would lose.

it all comes down to money and resources. Money also has Influence and resource attainment attached to it.

Not sure why people who live in poor states have this confidence lol. Money rules everything and a poor state isn’t shutting off bridges and tunnels in a billion trillion dollar empire

 

[BucciMane]

Texas without having to think twice.

 

[UberEatsDriver]

I could see it now. A poor state literally trying to shut off bridges and tunnels in NYC. The amount money and connections NYC has. Southern brehs wouldn’t even make it past West Virginia

 

[K.O.N.Y]

I could see it now. A poor state literally trying to shut off bridges and tunnels in NYC. The amount money and connections NYC has. Southern brehs wouldn’t even make it past West Virginia

Exactly

that Fortune 500

the stock market

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Exactly

that Fortune 500

the stock market

If you examine the history of wars it’s always the richest colony who prevails most of the time.


Poorer and less resourceful colonies for the most part are all talk. NYC has so much money it could influence the south to turn on eachother for the right price.


I could easily see Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky the Virginia’s turning on the rest of the south if I gave them an offer they can’t refuse

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Britain damn near ruled the entire world with little to no resources lol

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Texas Agriculture, Bigger in More Ways Than You Might Know
“Texas has more farms and land in farms than any other state in the U.S.”

texas aint AZ breh...

AZ has pretty varied biomes as well...