Whineback thinks Job guys should get paid the same as Main Event Draws :LOL:

MrFirst2doit

All Star
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
1,524
Reputation
-180
Daps
4,885
Reppin
NULL
:childplease: The NERVE.... I learned a long time ago you are paid by how hard you and your skillset are to replace... that's it... little kids not dragging their soccer moms and dads to fill up seats to watch you job out to Kalisto.. they paying to see the DRAWS....the MAIN-EVENTER's... The Reason Floyd Mayweather or John Cena or whoever gets paid the way they do is because they are the draw... ratings, arenas, etc same with wrestling even if it's predetermined... the guys who draw are the guys who are perceived to be the main event....yes they deserve more money.... and NO RYBACK, you aren't entitled to sh*t...you are replaceable...if you won't job someone else will...tons of muscle bound roiders out there for Kalisto to beat on the pre-show....

-----------

Feed Me More

Today I sit and fly home and for the first time in years feel absolutely free. I will start by saying I did request to be taken off of WWE television until myself and Vince could get a yes or no on a new deal. This has been going on since my IC Title run and had been nothing but a major strain on my life as all I ever wanted to do was work for WWE. I was told to head home until we agree or not agree to specific terms and contrary to reports it isn’t over money or a bus that stuff was settled a while ago. It comes down to a major problem I have with not only WWE but wrestling in general.


Wrestling is pre determined, we as performers know before we go out to that ring or perform a backstage scene who is winning and losing etc or have a general idea of what we are going to say. It blows my mind how in a sport which is pre determined from a company standpoint winners are paid so much more than the losers. Every single person who works for WWE from top to bottom is absolutely just as valuable as the next. The winners cannot win unless the losers go out there and agree to lose to them.

Read Also: Ryback Pulled From Television and Sent Home From Raw Tonight Following Big Contract Dispute

It blows my mind that in this day and age though we still adhere to this formula. Obviously things have always been this way, but does that make them right? Times have changed and our goal as humans should be to evolve and learn from our past and the past of others so we could make this world a better place. Why is it a guy who is told he is going to go out and lose and does everything he is told be paid not only less, but much less than said winner over a period of time. Every single performer for WWE sacrifices the same amount of time from home and their families and every single man or women goes out and does what they are told. Looking at this formula though losers turn into what fans like to call jobbers and their value decreases in the companies eyes and before you know it they get released. For what? For doing exactly as they are told!




Why not pay the talent equally? The winners have more MERCH as it is or are supposed to anyways so they get that extra perk, but why make the guy who is told to and agrees to lose earn less and sacrifice spots in big pay per view match ups etc. This is one of the major problems with wrestling and WWE today. Most guys take great satisfaction in helping making other talent, the b—hing and the moaning we always hear about stems from the fact they know they are ultimately over time going to make less and live in fear of being released.

I am proud to say I have never gone to change a finish and have gladly took pride in helping put over other talent. Hell look at my pay per view record of 12-26 and you will see that has been the pattern of my career. I have always been confident in my ability and work ethic to being my best every day and ultimately always felt that by doing good it was the right thing to do. Personally seeing my money go down over the years though even though I was working as much as ever and being denied magazine covers and other projects as well as watching my role diminish no matter what I did or how hard I tried takes its toll on a human. Being told no matter how hard I work or how good I get doesn’t always pay off is something I f–king refuse to ever believe in my life. I am a creative being and to be restricted time and time again is no way to live life. There is nothing I cannot do and I know no matter what comes of this situation I am going to be just fine. It isn’t soley about money, it is about commitment. Commitment to a guy who f–king cares and who loves this more than anything in the world and wants to know that his passion his efforts and his determination to constantly improve is going to be recognized and taken care of.

WWE may very well release me, which if it is the case so be it. If we can work things out a lot needs to change as I am not living in fear and creatively cannot continue to live a life that limits me creatively. I have many other interests and passions and have been very smart with my finances over the years. I thank every WWE superstar from top to bottom for their sacrifices and for working with me. The world is an amazing place and there is more than just a WWE universe there is The Universe and I will prove one way or another over time I am the greatest big guy in the universe!


Read more at Ryback Speaks Out on His WWE Status, Says "WWE May Very Well Release Me"
 

Swagnicious

All Star
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
1,418
Reputation
920
Daps
12,295
Reppin
Swagville
WWE = The Office

CM Punk = Leslie David Baker (actor the plays Stanley)

Ryback = Brian Baumgartner (actor that plays Kevin)

Leslie wants to be the show's co-star along with Steve Carell, and have his character Stanley be central to most of the episodes....because he thinks he's the best actor

Brian doesn't mind not being the star and not being central to episodes....but he wants to be paid just as much as Steve Carell


Michael-What-the-office-10400786-400-226.gif
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
36,805
Reputation
-3,548
Daps
82,703
He is right though.
If you are a big name and you play the villain you get paid as much as other big names, tying the pay of an actor to the success on screen of the character they play is one of the dumbest things you can hear.
 

YvrzTrvly

All Star
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Messages
3,634
Reputation
-207
Daps
8,473
He is right though.
If you are a big name and you play the villain you get paid as much as other big names, tying the pay of an actor to the success on screen of the character they play is one of the dumbest things you can hear.
You understand what an actor actually does right?
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
121,341
Reputation
8,206
Daps
143,204
Reppin
Westcoast
It's all a work so it's all legit but there are guys who the fans demand that make them more valuable and if you don't have any political backing as a job guy, it wouldn't matter what they do with you anyway.
 
Top