The point is that it doesn’t matter because no running back, not even a generational one is worth taking in the top ten picks because you don’t need one to win.
You play to win.
That’s the whole point.
Why would you take a running back 8th overall when you can win as many games or more with a running back taken on Day 2 or 3? And the history proves this.
You refuse to answer that simple question.
DawgTomlinson didn’t win a title either.
Hell Barry Sanders was the most generational RB ever. He didn’t win anything either.
Why not? Because the team lacked talent elsewhere that had a greater correlation/impact to winning.
Everyone understands this but you seem hell bent on ignoring it out of this Bijan stannery.
Yeah. He’s great.
But he’s not good enough to justify that heavy of an investment that comes at that draft price.
The Seahawks have two 2nd round RBs. The Bills have another. They are also better teams than the Falcons. That’s not a coincidence.
Draft strategy and value matters.
You gotta stop using these lame lazy media talking points about not taking a RB in the 1st round
You sound ridiculous and you are using ZERO context
Emmitt Smith was drafted in the 1st round.. Did he win a SB?
What about Marcus Allen? He was a 1st rd pick. Did he win a SB?
What about Walter Payton? Wasn't he a 1st rd pick?
Did he win a SB?



