Comparing percentages without context is silly
Something like 85 percent of draymonds 3 point attempts come when he doesnt have a defender within 4 feet of him

So then why compare the two in first place? You can't use the apple to oranges argument then proceed to compare them as If they're both oranges.

(Edit)
You just made my point in your previous post
Barkley and Dray are nothing alike and it's not a good comparison

