Creoles are ados in every sense of the word.
Who will be the first rapper to claim #ADOS?
- Thread starter Shoog Shatmi
- Start date
Creoles are ados in every sense of the word.
Captain Crunch
Veteran
I saw her Mama's family tree and they made no mention of her mom's side being enslaved in US.
The difference between aados(same ethnic group) on the east coast and west coast is not at all like the difference between aados and other afro-new worlders.
The groups have diverged for 250+ years now and produced radically different cultures and heritages.
And we were really different from the get go given the proportions of certain types of africans brought to certain places in the new world and how many not to mention the rice then cotton slave culture that existed here vs there, the gang labor system slave system that existed here vs there, the banishment of hand drums here vs there, the massive domestic slave here vs there, the natural birth rate of slaves here vs there, the underground railroad here vs there, the civil war here vs there. And that's all just considering the slavery era, not to mention all the things that happened AFTER slavery that played a critical part in shaping aados identity which we don't share with other afro new worlders.
Last edited:
Even if her ancestors slaves who were freed during the colonial era, that's still within what is today the contiguous US, thus aados.
I definitely wouldn’t call bloods and crips in the same breath as ethnicity. IT really makes no sense to once you understand what ethnicity REALLY encompassesThe bolded is a beast #ADOS fanatics don't wanna go anywhere near, cuz they're on the same bullshyt energy.
I'll pivot slightly and center my point with crips and bloods... how many conversations were had about "whether you're cuz or blood, it's all black" to no avail? Cuz fools were too concerned with banging their setI got news for a lot of brehs out there:
Crips are a LINEAGE
Bloods are a LINEAGE
etc
That's how you get cousins that are members of rival gangs and can't don't even fukk with each other.... And we haven't ventured off into any immigrant groups or what have you. I'm specifically talking so called "ADOS"
Imma need you to address my post in full, you omitted the actual point. The part you quoted was just a preface.
I said a LINEAGE, not an ethnicity. Generational gangbanging is very real.
Moreover, given enough time and the right conditions that AREN'T of our own doing and a new ethnicity will eventually arise.
Would southern so-called "ADOS" be a different ethnicity from our northern and western counterparts had the Confederates won the Civil War?
What about North and South Korea... are they still the same ethnicity at this point??? NK is so extreme.... that HAD to lead to some major differences that are ongoing, no?
My answer to the bolded is still no and yes north Korea and south Korea are still considred Koreans...regardless of the boardersI said a LINEAGE, not an ethnicity. Generational gangbanging is very real.
Moreover, given enough time and the right conditions that AREN'T of our own doing and a new ethnicity will eventually arise.
Would southern so-called "ADOS" be a different ethnicity from our northern and western counterparts had the Confederates won the Civil War?
What about North and South Korea... are they still the same ethnicity at this point??? NK is so extreme.... that HAD to lead to some major differences that are ongoing, no?
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
Well, to that, my point is it's all a matter of and designation
Again, we grew up in an era of family members not fukking with each other cause they had the wrong affiliation.NK and SK on the other hand have been divided for much longer
and that's a geopolitical divide... similar dynamics, just an expanded playing field.Sure, they're both still considered "Koreans" but we may see how severe the divide is once Kim Jong Un's death is officially announced. They have different modalities, different allies, etc... and again, that was all determined by external forces. We're "ADOS" and yet descendants of slaves went to battle against one another, Confederate vs Union, and for what??? Another man's dream snd vision of who we are... My bad for pulling so many examples, but I'm tryna zero in on the card being played.
I mean, if you looks at it, Aados came from different parts of Africa depending on where they ended up enslaved at. It makes sense why their are ingrained cultural differences outside of where you live now.
again your confusing nationality with ethnicity, i dont think you understand how focused ethnicity is. it encompassesWell, to that, my point is it's all a matter of and designation
NK and SK on the other hand have been divided for much longer
Sure, they're both still considered "Koreans" but we may see how severe the divide is once Kim Jong Un's death is officially announced. They have different modalities, different allies, etc... and again, that was all determined by external forces. We're "ADOS" and yet descendants of slaves went to battle against one another, Confederate vs Union, and for what??? Another man's dream snd vision of who we are... My bad for pulling so many examples, but I'm tryna zero in on the card being played.
1. lineage
2. race
3. nationality
3. language
4 .history
5. tradition/culture
6. and maybe sociology-political or sociology-economic status
South korea and north korea may not fukk with each other on an national level but but they are both still the same ethnicity if we look at it from a cultural, linguistic. and lineage standpoint
ADOS doesn't matter west coast, south, northeast all still the same ethnicity since they're still within the same breath of american culture and history
most countries in africa have a populace of people that are usually not the same ethnicity (except for Somalia i think that's the only country in Africa where people share the same culture/ethnicity) because a majority of those nations are man-made and technically shouldn't even exist but thats another debate for a another time
Last edited:
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
na, because West Coast and North East Coast ADOS are part of the same landmass and immediate slave stock(s). Most of all, they've all experienced UNIQUE-DISTINCT WHITE AMERICAN forms of oppression & terror such as
.....that make the ADOS experiences that would help give them a common bond, distinct from DOS in other regions outside of mainland USA
all DOS share the same AFRICAN ancestors BUT the creolization processes and the experiences they faced during their formations as a distinct ethnic group, are not the same.
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
The bolded is a beast #ADOS fanatics don't wanna go anywhere near, cuz they're on the same bullshyt energy.
I'll pivot slightly and center my point with crips and bloods... how many conversations were had about "whether you're cuz or blood, it's all black" to no avail? Cuz fools were too concerned with banging their set
Crips are a LINEAGE
Bloods are a LINEAGE
etc
That's how you get cousins that are members of rival gangs and can't don't even fukk with each other.... And we haven't ventured off into any immigrant groups or what have you. I'm specifically talking so called "ADOS"
this dude comparing crips and bloods to an ethnicity
Breh... I understand ethnicity. My point is, over TIME: fractures (if facilitated) will lead to a new ethnicity.
- We would not be the same ethnicity if the south won.
- The British, Australians, Canadians, etc all share the same language, a common ethnicity, tradition/culture history at some point, and yet they're not the same ethnic group. Somehow it's not major "beef" for them either.
- We would not be the same ethnicity if gangbanging was legitimized.
I think the disconnect between us is happening because you're looking down the line for the final result whereas I'm trying to point out how it all unravels
Last edited: