"Whoever came up with the Decison to beat Goldberg? That was bad. Whoever OK'd it..

I_Q

All Star
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
1,168
Reputation
440
Daps
2,991
At least have him continue to be a monster until someone new comes along he can put over and still look strong. I'll give Nash credit for not winning clean but him winning it and losing it to hogan the way he did was disgraceful but that's hogan being hogan. Then on top of that the infamous butts in the seats comment was the same night, the whole situation was shyt
 

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
87,405
Reputation
5,158
Daps
193,596
The decision to beat Goldberg gets shyt on, but I don't understand what they think the alternative is? Beat everyone and then what? Beat them again?

That schtick only plays for so long.

Exactly. He had to lose someday. It just shouldn't have been Nash. It should've been someone on the upswing. But then again, who the fukk was that in 98?
 

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
212,515
Reputation
22,184
Daps
535,053
Exactly. He had to lose someday. It just shouldn't have been Nash. It should've been someone on the upswing. But then again, who the fukk was that in 98?
uV8CW5K.gif
 

DaylitoJames

#SnitchGang Elite
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
99,274
Reputation
33,138
Daps
312,955
Reppin
Sneak Nation
Exactly. He had to lose someday. It just shouldn't have been Nash. It should've been someone on the upswing. But then again, who the fukk was that in 98?
Was Jericho still in the company in 98? Or let DDP beat him at Halloween Havoc... ironically nobody would have seen it :snoop:
 

I_Q

All Star
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
1,168
Reputation
440
Daps
2,991
I would've preferred Goldberg put over stiener or booker the next year compared to what happened
 
Top