Whose Fault was it?

[Cynical Thoughts]

Thats cool. I just used that as further explanation of speed. Even without that, you can visually see that the car was doing about 40 after impacting the FIRST car AND braking. He was clearly speeding grossly. Nothing I said is excusing the Jag being a shyt driver but Ive seen this exact scenario play out at the scene and in court. The silver car will be held responsible. His speed was too excessive and he struck a stationery vehicle AND a poorly merging vehicle.

And why would i need to explain another car weaving through traffic? He was speeding as well. Whats there to explain?

All the other cars moving was going just about the same speed even ones in on coming traffics. Really hard to judge unless we know the area.
Everyone could have done stuff differently.

 

[Rawtid]

How are the wheels not moving? What is that called?

“My wheels are too big for my car, with my dumb ass”

 

[Lord_nikon]

Breh the jag was on rims and lifted. The other car was lowered and the point of impact was the jags back wheel under the bumper.


Right he rear ended a car completely stopped because the jag was crossing two of lanes going 5 miles an hour.

explain the speed of the car weaving through the accident.

it looks like the oncoming traffic is also moving at a high rate of speed.

yeah i forgot about that( the jag ), i think its called wide turn,,

if you turning right alwsys Merge into the right lane also,,

its best to take drivers ed

 

[HiphopRelated]

Silver car rearended two cars. The car in the left lane that was stopped to let the Jag turn, AND the Jag. Silver car is fukked.

Jag's fault, you have to stop before entering a road.

if you stop, you can see a vehicle approaching.....

Silver only rear ended the other car because Jag was in his lane and the reflex was to pull left.

 

[Hoshi_Toshi]

Why would you creep out into the road like that? Hit the gas

 

[Umoja]

All the other cars moving was going just about the same speed even ones in on coming traffics. Really hard to judge unless we know the area.
Everyone could have done stuff differently.

It is not hard to judge.

This forum is filled with idiots. The drivers behind him were able to respond to his fukk up because they were not speeding. Moreover "Your honor, other drivers were speeding that day" is not a valid defence.

You're not going to escape liability when, but for your gross misconduct, damage wouldn't occur.

 

[Geode]

The main gray car had already hit the other gray car on the side before it hit the jag. You can hear the two crashes.

 

[Cynical Thoughts]

It is not hard to judge.

This forum is filled with idiots. The drivers behind him were able to respond to his fukk up because they were not speeding. Moreover "Your honor, other drivers were speeding that day" is not a valid defence.

You're not going to escape liability when, but for your gross misconduct, damage wouldn't occur.

Is there a traffic light ahead. What’s the speed limit. How far are you allowed to park away from the curb?

All you are looking at is a car slamming into another car failing to yield the right of way.

You can see on coming traffic moving just as fast and traffic directly behind the accident moving just as fast.

its definitely more to it than what you see.

 

[1thouwow]

Clearly it’s the Jags fault. Why would anymore slowly creep into oncoming traffic?


The striking car didn’t have time to stop because it was speeding

If the striking car didn’t have time to stop then it was their fault

 

[Coco Loco]

If the striking car didn’t have time to stop then it was their fault

If the Jag hadn’t creeped into ongoing traffic there’d be no reason to stop. The cars were already in the road giving them the right of way, speeding or not. The only variable was the Jag creeping into traffic. What moron creeps into already flowing traffic?

 

[1thouwow]

If the Jag hadn’t creeped into ongoing traffic there’d be no reason to stop. The cars were already in the road giving them the right of way, speeding or not. The only variable was the Jag creeping into traffic. What moron creeps into already flowing traffic?

Just say you ain’t got your license

 

[Tenchi Ryu]

Some of y’all ain’t never gonna win against your insurance company

 

[Coco Loco]

Just say you ain’t got your license

I've had my license since I was 17. Passed both written and road tests the first time. Having the right of way is what you're not understanding. That car had no business coming onto the road without having a clear accessible path. If there is no clear access, wait until there is. The Jag driver didn't, he's at fault. What's not clicking?

Just say you make dumb decisions behind the wheel and go

 

[1thouwow]

I've had my license since I was 17. Passed both written and road tests the first time. Having the right of way is what you're not understanding. That car had no business coming onto the road without having a clear accessible path. If there is no clear access, wait until there is. The Jag driver didn't, he's at fault. What's not clicking?

Just say you make dumb decisions behind the wheel and go

Sure you can be “morally” right but insurance ain’t gonna cover the Honda. You read ended somebody aka YOU hit them. He shouldn’t have been speeding, he should’ve at least a 5 second cushion and he should’ve been paying attention. Clearly the driver was texting and driving.

 

[Coco Loco]

Sure you can be “morally” right but insurance ain’t gonna cover the Honda. You read ended somebody aka YOU hit them. He shouldn’t have been speeding, he should’ve at least a 5 second cushion and he should’ve been paying attention. Clearly the driver was texting and driving.

The question was who was at fault not whose insurance is gonna cover the accident. I acknowledged the speeding in my initial post that still doesn’t absolve the Jag driver for recklessly entering traffic without looking to make sure he could safely enter the road. How are you glossing over that?