I'm not moving the goalpost. If anything its been you who has.
Stop caping for religious people then.
Yet you and religious people still can't prove a God exist or doesn't exist. Just give it up already.
I never claimed to be able to. Its the theists whose claims falter under investigation
Could there be a god? Sure. But the people who currently claim there is don't make arguments that stand up to any sort of inquiry.
No it doesn't and it shows your lack of reading skills. My point was and only was is that the Roman Catholic church and some Jews accept the Big Bang Theory and Evolution. Meanwhile Atheist(who know zip on the subject) use those two sciences ti try and debunk religious as a whole, when oblivious to them religious people like the Roman Catholic church ALREADY BELIEVES IN THOSE SCIENCES!!!! How can you debunk someone with something they already agree to!???? Get what I am saying now??? Or do I have to lower this down more?
Doesn't matter. 1. the catholic church took hundreds of years to accept heliocentrism formally and decades with evolution.
If you proclaim something in your religion is infallible, then it would never change.
If the church was worth its weight in defending "the word" why update their theology to fit the modern world?
How many times do I have to tell you that the Jews killing Jesus is NO LONGER accepted by not just Catholics but also many protestants. Did you not read the quote I posted?
Doesn't matter. The catholics waited until 1960 to figure that shyt out.
If this was 1970, you'd find this a bigger deal than it currently is.
Nobodies trying to debate theology. I clearly showed you that its a big misconception that the Jews killed Jesus. And so the catholic church is not wrong in correcting things. Nothing more nothing else.
ME NO CURR
The church is wrong in asserting infallibility, yet continually being fallible.
My point was the early scientist still had religious beliefs and yet they still accepted those two sciences. And "only funding" my ass, when we already know about this.
doesn't matter. not all scientific discoveries challenge the central doctrines of all scientists.
cognitive dissonance.
And if I remember correct(I could be wrong), the catholic church too came under fire for accepting the sciences. AGAIN the catholic church were the EARLY contributors of evolution and the big bang theory.
MOTHER fukkING FALSE.
They refused to accept it for many many many years
and la maitre wasn't a catholic. he was apart of very specific CULT of jesuits.
The Catholic Church first formulated the scientific method and has always used it since the method was formed. You are really showing a great display of ignorance if you did not know that the first modern schools, universities and hospitals and similar endeavours are founded on the educational principles of the Catholic Church.
No they fukking didn't
The enlightenment and the stubborness of the church is what we have to thank for that.
and hospitals schools doesn't mean fukk all. these institutions rejected many scientific claims in the name of religion.
Stop being tribal and just admit that the people you try to slander pioneered the sciences that you use to try and debunk them!
No true scientist can be religious in as much as they refuse to put their own beliefs to the same standard.
Only shows that you argument is an emotional one and not a rational one.
its entirely consistent.
I don't support any religious ideas.
But how does that impact you? It doesn't impact me and so I don't care.
It impacts us daily. From people trying to force their religion on students in public schools to trying to STILL challenge medical principles under the guise of piety.
fukk all of them.
Stop defending those who conveniently neglect to unilaterally look in the mirror with respect to their own views. To hell with all of them.
