"Why do men love more deeply than women"

[Cereal_Bowl_Assassin]

“I wanted other men, you wasted my youth!! ” that why I go in on these females. They cannot stay with one man they are always looking for a bigger better deal. I rather stay single. Once again, women are making us men very complex to understand when we are simple to deal with

I know a woman that always wanted something more from her man, dude was super cool but with every level of their relationship she wanted more..it confused me...you have a guy that is nice and provides but you are never satisfied...

 

[Crayola Coyote]

I know a woman that always wanted something more from her man, dude was super cool but with every level of their relationship she wanted more..it confused me...you have a guy that is nice and provides but you are never satisfied...

man, I hope he didn’t bend over backwards to her footstool/servant to make the “queen” happy.

 

[Taadow]

it's true but not for the reasons she gave

love is based on action

by nature men are more active & giving

our role is to provide love

women love to be loved

the ultimate reciprocation of the love a man provides a woman is a child & family

issue is too many folks tryna play thief

tryna get everything for nothing

*

Everything you sId here was Church...but the red part is the answer to the initial question.

Men have been conditioned to where we can love something/someone and understand that we could not be loved back. Our minds let us be frivolous about the idea of love in that way.

Women do not (some say "cannot") love that way. It can be argued that women instinctively
"ain't got time for that". Their biological (and perhaps socially-engineered) goals dictate that they have
to get this "love" chit right more often than not...they have to have something to show for their effort.

 

[Cel 510 kid ados forever]

lol this is crazy

 

[HearNoEvil]

The answer is that love is more dangerous for women than it is for men.

No need for a paragraph.

 

[Voice of Reason]

Nearly every thing is completely false. If not simps would not exist.

 

[Voice of Reason]

it's true but not for the reasons she gave

love is based on action

by nature men are more active & giving

our role is to provide love

women love to be loved

the ultimate reciprocation of the love a man provides a woman is a child & family

issue is too many folks tryna play thief

tryna get everything for nothing

*

You and @Benefited have the most interesting insights

 

[010101]

Everything you sId here was Church...but the red part is the answer to the initial question.

Men have been conditioned to where we can love something/someone and understand that we could not be loved back. Our minds let us be frivolous about the idea of love in that way.

Women do not (some say "cannot") love that way. It can be argued that women instinctively
"ain't got time for that". Their biological (and perhaps socially-engineered) goals dictate that they have
to get this "love" chit right more often than not...they have to have something to show for their effort.

it's necessary

women live by virtue of men's love

like i said love meaning action

man provides & protects by virtue of nature designing us for war/work

in a world without men loving women we all go extinct

females would be even more at the mercy of circumstances

*

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

People so easily manipulated when u stroking their ego. This shyt is all arbitrary. Gender is NOT a good indicator of ur capacity to love someone deeply.

I could easily say the same shyt about men and have women nodding their heads on some yep shyt too. Hell man’s fantasy about polygamy could be used to undermine this nonsense. Or the fact that dudes be lying on their dikk claiming they loved the chicks they cheated on or treated like dirt.

Good people who are willing to treat people the way they want to be treated know how to love. I bet she don’t even know what love is.
Social media is the dumb blind leading the blind

 

[010101]

You and @Benefited have the most interesting insights

you mean the carbonation cult stan¿*

 

[Voice of Reason]

you mean the carbonation cult stan¿*

a

I don’t always agree with him but I can’t deny that his takes are usually interesting

 

[010101]

I don’t always agree with him but I can’t deny that his takes are usually interesting

respect he sticks to his script*

 

[5n0man]

What’s a summary

Basically she's saying that men fall in love with a woman's character while women fall in love with the perks of a relationship and what a man can financially do for her.

When those perks are gone and the relationship isnt as exciting, the love she had for that man is gone too.

 

[5n0man]

Talking about how women got plenty options without adding the context that the vast majority of those options are dudes who just want to plow her out and talking about a man's love is some simp ass dude waiting for his turn.

She said that in the context of a woman staying with a man for 10 years without marriage. She's saying that women have no one to blame but themselves if they find themselves in a relationship for years and marriage isnt on the table cause women have options and dont have to stay with a dude that wont marry them.

 

[mbewane]

She actually made good points. Especially the "Love isn't a project" thing.That's the difference between love and a relationship. Problem is some women make the mistake of equating both because they believe the romantic fairytales. Men on the other hand understand that relationships can be about love...or not. Which is why it's, if I'm not mistaken, mostly women who end up asking for a divorce.

Also when men are actually in love, I feel they (we) stay attached for longer becase it takes us more time to get attached in the first place. While on the contrary women tend to get attached quickly, but when it's over it's over, they moving on (becasue as a woman, you do have options, if only for "rebound/revenge fukks").

Obviously this is all generalizations though.