Nah I just know what hacking means. If I'm using the coli, and the creator of the site made all your personal information public, I'm not wrong for being able to see your information by clicking on your name through normal use of the site. You should bytch to cook for fukking up.
If you have an issue with them actually using the data fine. But this is politics and I would fully expect the Clinton campaign to do the same if due to some bad programming all the Sanders data was visible. I'm not going act aghast at this.
No "hacking" took place.
Anyone denying the NGP VAN HACK is a LIAR.
You can't hide it anymore.
No one wants to ask what the fukk Tad Devine was doing this whole time.
Tad Devine knew Sanders for a DECADE at that point Sanders decides to run for president. Tad Devine helped Sanders 2006 senate run.
And this is the same time ...literally....Tad Devine is working with Manafort.
We MUST know if any of that hacked POLLING DATA from Hillary Clinton data in 2015 ended up in Manafort's hands...in addition to the russia email hack!
THIS IS THE DIRECTOR OF THE "ACTIVE MEASURES" MOVIE EVERYONE LOVED...
NAH BRUH....TAD DEVINE ALONE SHOULD SINK SANDERS JUST LIKE MANAFORT IS SINKING TRUMP
SANDERS GOT PUNISHED FOR HACKING HILLARY'S VOTER EMAIL THEN TRIED TO B!TCH AND MOAN ABOUT IT!!!
THEY EXPORTED DATA AS SHOWN BY THE LOGS!
How did JOSH URETSKY (the Sanders staffer who did the hack) KNOW ABOUT THE ZERO-DAY EXPLOIT? They planned to have FOUR people do the hack within the span of an HOUR!
Thats COORDINATION TO STEAL INFORMATION:
The actual DNC staffer says this is BS and that there was an actual devastating data breach!
Amy Dacey was the CEO of the Democratic National Committee:
As a result of this analysis, NGP VAN found that campaign staff on the Sanders campaign, including the campaign’s national data director, had accessed proprietary information about which voters were being targeted by the Clinton campaign — and in doing so violated their agreements with the DNC.
These staffers then saved this information in their personal folders on the system, and over the course of the next day, we learned that at least one staffer appeared to have generated reports and exported them from the system.
None of this is in dispute. It’s fully documented in the system logs. And these details reveal nothing less than a serious violation of the agreements governing the use of this data. Underscoring that fact is the point that the Sanders campaign has fired their national data director and indicated further disciplinary actions may be taken pending the results of their own investigation.
When we understood what initially happened, we asked the Sanders campaign to tell us who exactly accessed Hillary for America information, share their understanding of what data was accessed, describe what was done with that information, and detail how the campaign intended to discipline the staffers involved.
On Thursday, further NGP VAN analysis revealed that it was very likely that a user had taken data out of the system during the breach. Upon learning that, the DNC had to suspend the Sanders campaign’s access to the voter file to ensure the integrity of the system. This action was not taken to punish the Sanders campaign — it was necessary to ensure that the Sanders campaign took appropriate steps to resolve the issue and wasn’t unfairly using another campaign’s data. This temporary suspension was well within the DNC’s authority. Moreover, the DNC was left with little choice in the matter when the Sanders campaign declined to respond in a timely manner to the requests for assistance with an investigation.
These staffers then saved this information in their personal folders on the system, and over the course of the next day, we learned that at least one staffer appeared to have generated reports and exported them from the system.
None of this is in dispute. It’s fully documented in the system logs. And these details reveal nothing less than a serious violation of the agreements governing the use of this data. Underscoring that fact is the point that the Sanders campaign has fired their national data director and indicated further disciplinary actions may be taken pending the results of their own investigation.
When we understood what initially happened, we asked the Sanders campaign to tell us who exactly accessed Hillary for America information, share their understanding of what data was accessed, describe what was done with that information, and detail how the campaign intended to discipline the staffers involved.
On Thursday, further NGP VAN analysis revealed that it was very likely that a user had taken data out of the system during the breach. Upon learning that, the DNC had to suspend the Sanders campaign’s access to the voter file to ensure the integrity of the system. This action was not taken to punish the Sanders campaign — it was necessary to ensure that the Sanders campaign took appropriate steps to resolve the issue and wasn’t unfairly using another campaign’s data. This temporary suspension was well within the DNC’s authority. Moreover, the DNC was left with little choice in the matter when the Sanders campaign declined to respond in a timely manner to the requests for assistance with an investigation.
The question is....how did this Russian American dude working for Tad Devine's run campaign JOSH URETSKY learn about the 0-day???
Even subsequent reporting revealed that there was a much more serious breach: www.time.com/4155185/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-data/
Beyond simply reviewing the data, the logs show the Sanders staffers took deliberate steps to harvest and store the information. According to the logs, the Sanders staff created from scratch no fewer than 24 lists—consisting entirely of data pulled down from the Clinton campaign’s database—and saved them to their personal folders.
The logs show the Sanders campaign accessed the Clinton data for nearly one hour beginning around 10:40 p.m. Wednesday. The Sanders staffers were apparently able to view unique voter information along with accompanying information about how likely the voters were to vote for the various candidates, crucial information that the Clinton campaign has likely spent millions of dollars to collect.
...
In addition, the Sanders campaign has said that it did not download or retain any of the Clinton campaign’s data, and Weaver reiterated that claim on Friday afternoon at a press conference in Washington. “This campaign does not possess any data, does not retain any data and does not want any data,” said Weaver.
But the records from the NGP VAN software indicate that Sanders staffers did in fact save data to its own folders.
The logs show the Sanders campaign accessed the Clinton data for nearly one hour beginning around 10:40 p.m. Wednesday. The Sanders staffers were apparently able to view unique voter information along with accompanying information about how likely the voters were to vote for the various candidates, crucial information that the Clinton campaign has likely spent millions of dollars to collect.
...
In addition, the Sanders campaign has said that it did not download or retain any of the Clinton campaign’s data, and Weaver reiterated that claim on Friday afternoon at a press conference in Washington. “This campaign does not possess any data, does not retain any data and does not want any data,” said Weaver.
But the records from the NGP VAN software indicate that Sanders staffers did in fact save data to its own folders.
Read this more detailed break down:
Aye...I forgot...you know who got fired from the Sanders campaign for hacking hillary in 2015?
A RUSSIAN-AMERICAN!
Josh Uretsky: Fired Bernie Sanders aide: I wasn't peeking at Hillary Clinton data files - CNNPolitics