Why Have Console Gamers Adopted PC Gamer Elitism?

B86

Banned
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,563
Reputation
1,978
Daps
46,969
Reppin
Da Burgh
if you just really felt like spending money you couldve just copped an aftermarket cpu cooler and pushed the shyt outta your processor. the i5 2500k is a legendary chip and is notorious for being a great overclocker. performance gains from sandy bridge on to the skylake platform are minuscule :ld:

I know I had a "k" series chip but I don't do all that overclocking and shyt. You're right to a certain extent, but there's really no point in going through all of that for slightly better performance but having to monitor heat and possibly getting a new PSU. The 2500k could handle pretty much anything I through at it without overclocking. Nope...both stock, i5 6500 beats it out in all benchmarks (not by a whole lot, but still) so that's what I got. Why not move up to a newer board that uses faster DDR4 and much better on board audio (I'm a music freak) all for $32?

Intel Core i5-2500k vs. Intel Core i5-6500 - Benchmark & CPU Comparison - compare CPU at cpu-monkey
 

Everything Zen

All Star
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
497
Reputation
336
Daps
2,563
Reppin
Seven One Eight
I know I had a "k" series chip but I don't do all that overclocking and shyt. You're right to a certain extent, but there's really no point in going through all of that for slightly better performance but having to monitor heat and possibly getting a new PSU. The 2500k could handle pretty much anything I through at it without overclocking. Nope...both stock, i5 6500 beats it out in all benchmarks (not by a whole lot, but still) so that's what I got. Why not move up to a newer board that uses faster DDR4 and much better on board audio (I'm a music freak) all for $32?

Intel Core i5-2500k vs. Intel Core i5-6500 - Benchmark & CPU Comparison - compare CPU at cpu-monkey

in overclocking, you only really have to worry about increased heat/power draw when raising stock voltages... the 2500k can easily get to at least 4.5ghz on air without doing so. it may not reflect it in synthetic benchmarks, from a price/performance ratio, your 2500k was a much better value. DDR4 ram also isn't any faster than DDR3 (as of right now anyways. this will surely change.) clocks speeds may be a bit higher but the high CAS latency levels it.

just wanted to give my 2 worthless cents. i totally see why you did it :whoa:
 
Top