Tommy Knocks
retired
I never said they were afforded it, I said there are luxuries in prison point blank. You made the assumption I meant the govt, but actually, when I stated TV, I mean actual flat screen high defs which relatives can buy and get in prison for a 'fee' and some connects. Same applies for many other things.Okay. You must not get it.
You claimed that inmates get luxury items such as 'cigarettes' and 'TV.' This means that they are afforded this by the U.S. government while they are incarcerated. Wrong. They don't get cigarettes, they get TV. You put the two together. They get TV because they are able to purchase one for their bid etc. Then you go and say "they get cigarettes," which leads me to think you lyin about doing a bid cause cigarettes been banned since 2006.
"Oh, they get heroin, you think they can't get cigarettes" - You to some sortYou were talkin about luxury they get and now you tryin to back pedal your false statement by connecting it to contraband like heroin when at the beginning you were claiming they were 'afforded' cigarettes by the state.
That's like me saying: "Why don't they get guns in prison? They get knives as a luxury."
Just admit you lied holmes, that's all it is to it![]()
So back on topic, they get luxuries and porn shouldn't be banned. You can drill off topic all you want, but they SHOULD get porn and it SHOULDNT be banned.
You were talkin about luxury they get and now you tryin to back pedal your false statement by connecting it to contraband like heroin when at the beginning you were claiming they were 'afforded' cigarettes by the state.
