Why is promiscuity seen as power by a number of women over everything else?

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

A.) Most of the nonsense men have produced about female sexuality…hell women period, for the last gazillion years has been utter bullshyt used to justify control of female bodies to solidify their own tenuous power structures.
B.) When women fukk around and find out just how much they’ve been lied to by these social parameters, it’s empowering and refreshing to break free of those constraints.

 

[010101]

who was the first scavenger ass nikka to drop that puzzy is power line¿ ha

he's the einstein of thirsty chatting

that was the lightbulb moment that birthed all the queen mother goddess ass dirtballs out there

*

 

[Will Ross]

Well, it's the only power women have.

 

[Prodyson]

The power of sexuality, especially female sexuality cannot be reduced to the actual act of sex.

Why do you think so many "boss bytches", college educated, corperate, "I don't need a man" types get called out for being 'masculine' and not submissive enough? A big part of women improving in those areas as well has plenty to do with libido, harnessing their own inner masculinity and sex drive to focus, achieve...they may forgoe getting married, having kids (more sex based power dynamics outside of the act)...it's all connected.

Now let's flip that coin,



There is a whole subset of men on 'nofap' or even swearing off of women all together because the pull of sexuality is somehow keeping them from achieving their dreams, they have to take their power back! You either have coaches making millions telling dudes how to get women to validate themselves, or to leave them alone (kinda like the women in leadership positions leave men alone) to gain empowerment. It's why most world religons are set up to keep women's sexual drive subdued, the shyt ain't new.

SEX IS POWER, not just the act, but the energy, the drive, confidence, validation, all of it, and the women are born with the very thing most men have to 'improve' themselves and rig the game to get.

Sex alone is not power. If it were, the state of women wouldn’t be what it is today. Intimacy and relationship is power and can exist without sex. Sex as power is an illusion which is why so many women who think they can keep men with sex, don’t. Sex is only power when wielded against people who otherwise can’t get sex.

 

[Dave24]

It's not that hard to figure out why.

Men pursue and aquire power largely to get the thing women already have, the p*ssy. Men have organized the entire world around repressing female sexuality and keeping this power dynamic in place so their sex is always going to be an area of life where they can flex and assert themselves, as they should.

@SunZoo what are the famous men in the past and present who pursued and acquired power largely to get lots of p*ssy? What specific famous men can you say this applies to?

 

[OperationNumbNutts]

This sexual revolution as of late leads women to believe that there's power in fukking a bunch of nikkas

What about gaining knowledge? Creating generational wealth? Owning a business? Gaining positions of power in employment? Helping change the world for future generations? Why are these neglected when a large number of women talk about freedom?

Good question. You have to read between the lines and see the capitalist side to it. The longer women are single the more money goes into the economy. Think about it like this. Years ago Sundays were church, bbqs, and other low key events. Now with this push for women empowerment, Sundays are now dropping $30-$70 a week on brunch. That doesn't include the clothes, makeup, accessories, uber, etc. brought to go to these restaurants. And that's not even scratching the surface.

 

[Uitomy]

you nikkas acting like it was acceptable for just any kind of man to have multiple sex partners. Traditionally you had to be a hnic to have a roster of hoes other wise people called you a dirty womanizer and you'd be at risk of getting fukked up fukking with someone's daughter.

 

[SunZoo]

Sex alone is not power.

Sex alone is just an act fam, the power is in the CHOICE and females will always have the upper hand in that arena.

Now sexuality? Your libido, in and of itself is possibly the most foundational power that human beings have as it drives and affects things way beyond the act itself.

If it were, the state of women wouldn’t be what it is today. Intimacy and relationship is power and can exist without sex. Sex as power is an illusion which is why so many women who think they can keep men with sex, don’t. Sex is only power when wielded against people who otherwise can’t get sex.

The state of women is what it is today because men have spent a hell of a whole lot of time creating systems and cultures to cutail female sexual desire. Which is exactly why you have all these weak nikkas talmbout they gonna have to travel to another (even more regressive) country to find a woman as the pendulum starts to swing the other way.

 

[Originalman]

Well, it's the only power women have.

Yep its a camouflage for a lack of power. Paul Mooney had a saying how black folks talked shyt because they had no power so they tried to develop a way of almost pretending they had power with their words.

But as Paul said in the big scheme of things them words really had no power. He mentioned how all day a black person can tell a white person that they were gonna harm them. But the white person knows they really ain't gonna do shyt cause the white person is the one with power. Where as if the white person said they were going to harm you....you know it is a legit threat cause they can kill you and literally get away with it (with state and government behind them).

 

[Originalman]

Good question. You have to read between the lines and see the capitalist side to it. The longer women are single the more money goes into the economy. Think about it like this. Years ago Sundays were church, bbqs, and other low key events. Now with this push for women empowerment, Sundays are now dropping $30-$70 a week on brunch. That doesn't include the clothes, makeup, accessories, uber, etc. brought to go to these restaurants. And that's not even scratching the surface.

I mentioned this before on here. How corporations understood that its more money for them in individualism. Not community and family.

If you are trying to sell products as a economy or corporation I much rather sell products to a single woman than a women with a husband. Though she might have access to more money with a husband. That money spending decisions is made between the both of them, they might have kids and are normally more responsible (normally married people are more responsible than single folks in general).

It is far more easier to get access to a single woman's money than a married woman's money. Trust every car dealer hates for a married woman to walk into a dealership with her husband than some single woman. That single woman is considered an easy lick (dealer about to pull every trick in the book to pull at them emotional strings and get in that ladies pocket). Compared to that woman walking in with her man.

 

[SunZoo]

you nikkas acting like it was acceptable for just any kind of man to have multiple sex partners. Traditionally you had to be a hnic to have a roster of hoes other wise people called you a dirty womanizer and you'd be at risk of getting fukked up fukking with someone's daughter.

Ohhh...so not just any kind of man could have multiple sex partners? And who were selecting for/determining what kind of men got to do such a thing? The women and that dynamic is still very much in play.

If you weren't HNIC nobody called you shyt, the women just chose up on the men with the most power and resources, even if they had to share him. This is why 'enforced monogamy' became a thing. Not because god said so or it was the natural order of things. But to keep lame nikkas from not being able to get a date, lest they go to war and capture resources and "take" women from other men for themselves.

 

[OperationNumbNutts]

I mentioned this before on here. How corporations understood that its more money for them in individualism. Not community and family.

If you are trying to sell products as a economy or corporation I much rather sell products to a single woman than a women with a husband. Though she might have access to more money with a husband. That money spending decisions is made between the both of them, they might have kids and are normally more responsible (normally married people are more responsible than single folks in general).

It is far more easier to get access to a single woman's money than a married woman's money. Trust every car dealer hates for a married woman to walk into a dealership with her husband than some single woman. That single woman is considered an easy lick (dealer about to pull every trick in the book to pull at them emotional strings and get in that ladies pocket). Compared to that woman walking in with her man.

Nice points. For the longest I didn't understand the push. The financial side just make the most logic sense.

 

[Originalman]

Nice points. For the longest I didn't understand the push. The financial side just make the most logic sense.

Yep and I also believe that is why they push to have kids grow up faster / target them with adult things, entertainment and issues. The faster they grow up the faster they can take part in consumerism. Ain't that much money selling them toys and etc (that their parents will determine if it is bought).

The money is having them grow up quick so they can start buying (or getting their parents to buy) cell phones, designer clothes, cars, getting credit cards for debt, eating out at restaurants, purchasing expensive entertainment items and etc. They don't need them to be smart, or educated or responsible. Just hurry and grow up so that they can be consumers.

 

[RareHunter]

Because women were cursed to serve their husbands and be subordinates to men when Eve ate the apple. Notice when men follow women=Failure and women always want to control or change men. That is their curse. It affects negros worse as we are original man. For whites it doesn’t really affect them as bad as they are heathens, however they are losing their position because women are now the men.

 

[skyrunner1]

I mentioned this before on here. How corporations understood that its more money for them in individualism. Not community and family.

If you are trying to sell products as a economy or corporation I much rather sell products to a single woman than a women with a husband. Though she might have access to more money with a husband. That money spending decisions is made between the both of them, they might have kids and are normally more responsible (normally married people are more responsible than single folks in general).

It is far more easier to get access to a single woman's money than a married woman's money. Trust every car dealer hates for a married woman to walk into a dealership with her husband than some single woman. That single woman is considered an easy lick (dealer about to pull every trick in the book to pull at them emotional strings and get in that ladies pocket). Compared to that woman walking in with her man.

Dont forget the fact that you need double of everything, which this economy is based on debt so it only grows when people spend more.. If everyone is individual instead of coupled up, you need double the housing, transportation, beds, tvs, fridge, appliances, EVERY DAM THING.. It makes more sense to fuel the "gender war" heck it might be paid actors or bots making that shyt up to control narrative.. Go girl, you dont need no man, you can do it all by yourself, go to work and buy all this shyt to feel better about yourself, enjoy the hedonistic treadmill like everyone else, pay your shyt by the first