Why the Moon Landings Could Have Never EVER Been Faked
- Thread starter 69 others
- Start date
come on guys. this is why no one posts here. you guys are so mean to anyone with a different opinion
our moon has no atmosphere.
Atmosphere has to do more with trapping the heat
During the day the moon temp is around 253 F in the day around -387 F at night
The moon all around is
when thinking about it
Go back and do what? Prove we can get there faster?
We have a rover on Mars.
I drove to Cleveland once on a road trip. If I buy a better car, I ain't gonna waste it on a trip to Miami.
My point?
There's nothing interesting in Cleveland, just like there's nothing interesting on the Moon.
That still doesn't mean we did it to begin with.
Atmosphere has to do more with trapping the heat
During the day the moon temp is around 253 F in the day around -387 F at night
The moon all around is
And why is this shift in temperature odd to you?
The reason they can't up and say they go to the moon is becasue people is too smart to be lied to these days for one, for 2 we is gonna want a HD high tech live stream of whats going on and we know they don't want that at all. And if they are going up there, other countries would question like a motherfukker whats going on.............
I guess you really think Nasa is too broke to go to send shuttles to the moon,like they say, right ...............
SN: Not to mention they would have to go with the charade that they still use outdated and unsafe shuttle technology to send Astronauts in space, like we haven't had other rumored methods since the 70's
The reason they can't up and say they go to the moon is becasue people is too smart to be lied to these days for one, for 2 we is gonna want a HD high tech live stream of whats going on and we know they don't want that at all. And if they are going up there, other countries would question like a motherfukker whats going on.............
I guess you really think Nasa is too broke to go to send shuttles to the moon,like they say, right ...............
SN: Not to mention they would have to go with the charade that they still use outdated and unsafe shuttle technology to send Astronauts in space, like we haven't had other rumored methods since the 70's
As a matter of fact, I do.
My cousin was an engineer for NASA before he got laid off. He said it just bled money. He developed a torque wrench that could be used in space, it had to handle so many hundreds of degrees of heat and cold without expansion, and he said after all the receipts, manpower, etc, it cost over 200k to develop. I was blown away when he told me. They also have to keep a certain amount on each craft and so many in storage. That's just one torque wrench, imagine all the other tools they have to create and build and maintain stock of. Plus salaries, etc. While there are 2 wars and the height of a recession.
It's not like NASA completely shut down, they still have missions, and scientists, engineers, etc. Just not at the level they had before.
It makes sense to me
So it's just a coincidence that they canned the moon mirror laser project a few yrs ago? Armstrong and Aldrin ain't leave no muhfukkin' mirror on the moon becuz they were never there.
Enough and regards to the moons our moon is the biggest in regards to other moons in comparison to their planets size, our moon also has much lower temperatures than other moons, which may point to our moon not being a moon at all
the moon is disproportionately large compared to every other moon we have observed so far, like way too big for Earth. i saw a video discussing the geometric proportions of the moon and one thing that caught my attention is that is it just the right distance and size to perfectly eclipse the sun from the Earth's perspective...not over cover it, not too small to cover it all. just right for a perfect eclipse.
i'll try to find the video.
do you have evidence that leads you to think otherwise?
As a matter of fact, I do.
My cousin was an engineer for NASA before he got laid off. He said it just bled money. He developed a torque wrench that could be used in space, it had to handle so many hundreds of degrees of heat and cold without expansion, and he said after all the receipts, manpower, etc, it cost over 200k to develop. I was blown away when he told me. They also have to keep a certain amount on each craft and so many in storage. That's just one torque wrench, imagine all the other tools they have to create and build and maintain stock of. Plus salaries, etc. While there are 2 wars and the height of a recession.
It's not like NASA completely shut down, they still have missions, and scientists, engineers, etc. Just not at the level they had before.
It makes sense to me
makes zero fukking sense brehShouldn't a corporation that handles some of the countries defense have a endless budget...............That is simply the only excuse they could use
If they decided a televised moon trip this day and age, they
Has Nasa showed you there books, we all know our government can fund anything they want