Why the Washington Redskins should be called the Washington N-Words (Article)

FloorGeneral

I don't even know anymore...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,613
Reputation
2,685
Daps
22,711
Reppin
Packerland
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/m...nsive-to-you-how-about-the-washington-n-words

This week 10 members of Congress sent letters to the owner of the Washington Redskins, the commissioner of the NFL and all NFL teams. It was a powerful letter and did something extremely smart.

The letter to Dan Snyder, Washington's owner, says that "Native Americans throughout the country consider the 'R-word' a racial, derogatory slur akin to the 'N-word' among African Americans or the 'W-word' among Latinos."

It's about time someone made that point loudly and strongly.

These members of Congress are doing something extremely bright. They're making sure people who aren't around American Indians, or don't know the history of the use of that word, understand what it truly means.

And it only means one thing: It's a slur.

This is something blacks should get but shockingly, large numbers of black Washington fans stay silent on the issue, or they say, stupidly, the name Redskins is used to honor.

So, fine. OK, then. The city of Washington, DC, my birthplace, is approximately 50 percent black, according to the Census Bureau. We used to call it Chocolate City.

The team shouldn't be called the racist name Redskins. There is no significant population of American Indians. The percentage of American Indians in DC, the Census states, is 0.6 percent.

Thus the more correct correlation for a team name is the Washington N-Words.

If we're going to be bigots, why not go big? Or, actually, why not get more realistic?

Instead of a stereotypical Indian wearing war paint, the mascot can be a Sambo-like dude smacking his lips on some watermelon. Or maybe take Sergio Garcia's suggestion and have it be fried chicken.

What? That offends you? Seems ridiculous? The Redskins caricature is just as stereotypical and ugly.

If you want to know what it means to many American Indians when they hear Redskins -- and I'm part American Indian so I guess I have some say in the use of both of these words -- call the team the Washington N-Words.

The N-word and the R-word are, as the 10 members of Congress said, absolutely equivalent.

There is no outrage from American Indians in Washington because there are no damn American Indians in Washington.

The outrage from American Indians is there but since many have been, you know, exterminated over the centuries, their numbers are low.

If a new team in Los Angeles called themselves the LA W-Words, you can bet, with the city of Los Angeles having a significant Latino population, there would be outrage. And with the United States having a large Latino population, there would protests all over the country.

Also, if the Redskins were called the N-Words, then all of these hypocritical African-American Washington fans, who back the use of Redskins, would suddenly understand if the team was called the Washington N-Words.

So, from now on, let's call them that, and pull from our rectums that the word is used to honor blacks.

Sure, there will be some Uncle Tom American Indians who will say Redskins honors them, just like there were some Uncle Tom blacks who once didn't mind being called colored.

If you've never read the quote below, it is important, because it helps understand the true history behind the word. It comes from a man named Clem Ironwing, of Sioux descent, and was made before a committee in Kansas considering ending the use of Redskins for a high school.

"The word Redskin was taught to me at a very young age, and this is the meaning it has for me.

"I am a Native American. I grew up on an Indian reservation. As a child, the United States government and the Catholic church came into our homes, took us away from our families, and forced us into Catholic boarding schools. There was no choice to be had in this matter, you had to go. The Catholic church with the blessings of the United States government took it upon themselves to determine that we were savages, and needed to be transformed to fit into their society.

"When my hair was cut short by the priests, I was called a 'redskin' and a savage. When I spoke my native tongue, I was beaten and called 'redskin.' When I tried to follow the spiritual path of my people, I was again beaten and called a 'redskin.' I was told by them to turn my back on the ways of my people, or I would forever be nothing but a dirty 'redskin.'

“The only way 'redskin' was ever used towards my people and myself was in a derogatory manner. It was never, ever, used in a show of respect or kindness. It was only used to let you know that you were dirty and no good, and to this day still is.

“A long time ago, a group of people who had no knowledge of these facts, and who put no thought into what 'redskin' actually meant chose to use this word for their mascot. A new group of people, now being confronted about it, have somehow decided it is their decision to change the meaning of this word to fit their purposes and agendas, but again have put no thought into its true meaning or what this word means to Native Americans.”

So here we are, people actually still defending the name. So let's all call them the Washington N-Words.

And see how people feel.

Discuss.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,249
Reputation
19,904
Daps
245,646
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
lol, this is basically how I'd describe it to friends of mine that are 'skins fans. They really might as well be called the Washington nikkaz. Plus its all types of nikkaz in da city anyway. :laugh:

It's sorta tricky tho, cuz while its true I've also seen some instances in which Native Americans didn't mine the word. Ultimately tho it is a derogatory term, but with a name that's stuck for so long and especially with a lot of Virginian Bush types that love the team they'll be hard pressed to actually see a name change. Even for me who's not a skins fan but grew up in the area, it'd be weird to hear them called by another name. The Bullets change ain't mean much cuz hardly anyone gives a fukk about the Wizards but this is a Redskins/Cowboys town so it'd actually be noticed and felt throughout the area.
 

beanz

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
11,958
Reputation
2,496
Daps
25,389
Reppin
DR
they could just change their name to washington warriors and even keep the same logo. that would do more honor to native americans than redskins. or even use the name of whatever tribe was dominant in that area. washington mohawks, washington pawnees, washington piscataways. how the chicago blackhawks or the florida seminoles have been doing. even the cleveland indians. just plain indians. i can see how redskins is offensive.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,670
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,551
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
This is something blacks should get but shockingly, large numbers of black Washington fans stay silent on the issue, or they say, stupidly, the name Redskins is used to honor.

:laff: why do people keep making this point

The black "community" still doesn't know the definition of civil rights. According to most folks, its a black only thing.

There will never, ever, be a large majority of black redskins fans that will support this name change. There will never, ever, be a large majority of black nfl fans that will support this name change. There will never, ever, be a large majority of black people that will support this name change. And that's some real c00n ass shyt.

Adrian Peterson compared the nfl labor dispute to modern day slavery. I guarantee not a word will be said by anyone about this shyt. Goodell suspending a player for rape/dui's etc, everyone has an opinion. Gay guy comes out the closet, everyone has an opinion. Using a racial slur as a team name *crickets*.

Stamping out racial inequality, prejudice and racism should not be a 1 race vs 1 race thing. Just go to profootballtalk and read the comments section to see what's really going on.
 

Marciano

All Star
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
1,932
Reputation
160
Daps
2,534
Reppin
NULL
they could just change their name to washington warriors and even keep the same logo. that would do more honor to native americans than redskins. or even use the name of whatever tribe was dominant in that area. washington mohawks, washington pawnees, washington piscataways. how the chicago blackhawks or the florida seminoles have been doing. even the cleveland indians. just plain indians. i can see how redskins is offensive.

That actually ain't too bad....

:ohhh:

But Redskins fans are too diehard, I don't think it'll change & will forever be a thorn in the franchise's side
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
68,338
Reputation
14,349
Daps
426,117
Reppin
CHICAGO

:beli:LAST TIME I CHECKED...
THE OWNER & MAN WHO HAS FINAL SAY SO ON THIS ISSUE WAS DANIEL SNYDER.
WHY IS THE BLAME BEING DEFLECTED TOWARDS BLACKS?
D.C. KIKES FOR THE WIN.


OH NEVERMIND...ITS JUST SOME c00n TRYING TO GET HIS WHITLOCK ON.
10231.png

:devil:
:evil:
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,503
Reputation
610
Daps
7,584
Reppin
The Sweet Science
The Washington "N" word ?:beli: If they felt " niqqer" and "Redskin"are both equally offensive why did they feel comfortable saying redskin in the article and letter ? Why not sensor themselves by saying the "R" word instead ?
 
Top