Which has nothing to do with almost 4 million more people voting for Hillary. They listened to them, they voted. That's it. It's not a complicated process. I think Sander's supporters just like that moist feeling and shed many tears.
Which has nothing to do with almost 4 million more people voting for Hillary. They listened to them, they voted. That's it. It's not a complicated process. I think Sander's supporters just like that moist feeling and shed many tears.
That makes no sense, August 2015 comes before May 2016.
And again, do you understand the difference between vetted and actually getting paid?
My bad i misread the year..im on a phone ...but it still shows a level of collusion they were pretending didnt existMy bad i misread the year..im on a phone ...but it still shows a level of collusion they were pretending didnt exist
I REALLY don't get why some of ya'll don't post moreYep, but some people just can't reconcile that Bernie ran a worse campaign than Clinton.

BERNIE WAS NOT A DEMOCRATYou're still deflecting and forgetting the previous leaks that showed the DNC were planning on ways on defending Hillary way back since this time last year. It's cool to try to paint me as some bitter sore loser but that's not gonna prevent people from seeing your organization as the corrupt outfit it is. And there was already a wedge between supporters because one supports a candidate who takes money from Wall Street and enjoys going to war while the other doesn't. The only common theme was Trump is shyt but at some point people have got to answer for their behavior regardless. And even still she'll probably win so I don't know why you're in here tap dancing for the DNC. There's plenty of Sanders voters that will go for Hillary because they just preferred Bernie and don't really keep up with things like this.
And everything about Nevada was debunked and nobody has the identity of the people who were harassing as Sanders supporters. So yes they should apologize for calling the event violent when the politicians on stage were mocking them and attempted to curtail their voices.
Thanks for Correcting The Record breh. Everything is a big plot by the Russians and the DNC barring a few bad apples had no intention in tipping the game against Bernie.
I will now watch the DNC this week and soak in everything these politicians tell me and never question them ever again![]()

Support the tail wagging the dog and yell through text brehsBERNIE WAS NOT A DEMOCRAT
Holy shyt man.

Bruh, I'm waiting for something that's actually bad here.Support the tail wagging the dog and yell through text brehs![]()
I think collusion is a little drastic:
"secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others."
or was it just them thinking about paying him, one person, to speak at 1 event. Maybe it was just hotel and food, who knows. Lots of people speak at a lot of different events, especially during an election cycle.
I think it's just a lot of Sander's fans and Trump fans making a bigger deal of it than it actually is. Just politics, everybody does this. Also, what's been pointed out many times. Everytime I saw Sanders before this it was Sanders (I) not (D) Democrat. He should have ran independent. It's not shocking the DNC would want the actual Democrat to win.
EVENTS: * 1/16/2016; SC020; Charleston Jazz Brunch
* 10/1/2015; GA90; DWS Reception

If Bernie was such a terrible candidate like yall say then the DNC wouldn't have to do a single thing to help Hillary. But they did so that's it.Bruh, I'm waiting for something that's actually bad here.
The DNC is under no obligation to bend over backwards for someone who did jack shyt to the party's development or had any influence in it.
I remember that, and it was also before Bernie started his campaign. But that doesn't prove collusion. You would have to ignore the evidence showing the DNC trying to reach out to the Sanders campaign for that to be seen as a smoking-gun. Also, Obama took money from Wall Street and that didn't stop him from pursuing Wall Street regulations. This is all just bullshyt conjuncture. You scream corruption but fail show a link. Something Bernie couldn't even do. Is it because of speeches as a private citizen? Wrt being a war hawk. I don't think you guys understand the meaning of that word. I don't think she clamors for war. GWB would count as a warhawk - his administration used fake evidence to force a war with Iraq. Libya? We only took part in support of our European allies. Whether you believe that was right or wrong, I don't really care. This is just bitterness over your preferred outcome not coming to fruition. So you invent a false narrative using tenuous evidence at best.You're still deflecting and forgetting the previous leaks that showed the DNC were planning on ways on defending Hillary way back since this time last year. It's cool to try to paint me as some bitter sore loser but that's not gonna prevent people from seeing your organization as the corrupt outfit it is. And there was already a wedge between supporters because one supports a candidate who takes money from Wall Street and enjoys going to war while the other doesn't. The only common theme was Trump is shyt but at some point people have got to answer for their behavior regardless. And even still she'll probably win so I don't know why you're in here tap dancing for the DNC. There's plenty of Sanders voters that will go for Hillary because they just preferred Bernie and don't really keep up with things like this.
And everything about Nevada was debunked and nobody has the identity of the people who were harassing as Sanders supporters. So yes they should apologize for calling the event violent when the politicians on stage were mocking them and attempted to curtail their voices.

Bruh, this isn't the election for student government.If Bernie was such a terrible candidate like yall say then the DNC wouldn't have to do a single thing to help Hillary. But they did so that's it.
I have no problem with the DNC doing what they did, they're a private organization at the end of the day. But for people to try to defend their actions as anything but corrupt is comical and if they expect people to just take it because "Trump is bad" or "it's all a plot of the SVR RF" or whatever mental gymnastics people are going through isn't worth a damn.
That's exactly what it is. It's special snowflake syndrome. I don't really care anymore about the primary or the conspiracies surrounding it. I've read the emails and there's nothing there, so it's a waste of time.I think collusion is a little drastic:
"secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others."
or was it just them thinking about paying him, one person, to speak at 1 event. Maybe it was just hotel and food, who knows. Lots of people speak at a lot of different events, especially during an election cycle.
I think it's just a lot of Sander's fans and Trump fans making a bigger deal of it than it actually is. Just politics, everybody does this. Also, what's been pointed out many times. Everytime I saw Sanders before this it was Sanders (I) not (D) Democrat. He should have ran independent. It's not shocking the DNC would want the actual Democrat to win.
Nothing you said debunks what I said at all. It's obvious they were for Hillary but then you got people defending obvious collusion like it didn't happen.Bruh, this isn't the election for student government.
HRC is a staple in the DNC due to influence, power, and leverage.
Bernie has none of this.
Bernie should have been...just better.
The DNC is/was under no obligation to bend over backwards for Bernie.
I can't even call it corruption since i'm not stupid enough to be naive to think otherwise.
That's exactly what it is. It's special snowflake syndrome. I don't really care anymore about the primary or the conspiracies surrounding it. I've read the emails and there's nothing there, so it's a waste of time.
You read ALL 19,200 emails and 8000 attached documents in the span of one day???