Willow and Jaden are crazy breh :mjlol:

[CouldntBeMeTho]

there is no PROOF... notice the words they always use... MIGHT BE... PREDICT... THEORY OF RELATIVELY

these are not FACTS.... i mean shyt... it's the BIG BANG THEORY... even parts of evolution are still THEORY

The scientific definition of the word "theory" is different from the colloquial sense of the word. In the vernacular, "theory" can refer to guesswork, a simple conjecture, an opinion, or a speculation that does not have to be based on facts and need not be framed for making testable predictions.

However, in science, the meaning of theory is more rigorous. A scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."[24] Theories are formed from hypotheses that have been subjected repeatedly to tests of evidence which attempt to disprove or falsify them. In the case of evolution through natural selection, Darwin conceived the hypothesis around 1839, and made a first draft of the concept three years later in 1842. He discussed this widely with many of his intellectual companions, and conducted further research in the background to his other writings and work. After years of development, he finally published his evidence and theory in On the Origin of Species in 1859.[25]





in other words... it's just a well-substantiated thought.... but cannot be proven to be 100% fact like "water is wet" "1 plus 1 equals 2"


scientists BELIEVE these things might be true... but cannot prove it and make it happen 100% of the times they attempt it.. so they come with predictions and theories... but still legally, have to be very careful of their words, cause it's still not fact

they have to adjust clocks on satellites because of this

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

they have to adjust clocks on satellites because of this

then why isn't it considered a proven fact

see i'm not saying these things don't exist or can't exist... i'm saying they are beyond our comprehension that we can't even consider them 100% facts by scientists

they don't label things theories when they are facts... there's no theory of math

 

[CouldntBeMeTho]

then why isn't it considered a proven fact

see i'm not saying these things don't exist or can't exist... i'm saying they are beyond our comprehension that we can't even consider them 100% facts by scientists

they don't label things theories when they are facts... there's no theory of math

 

[J.Pinkman]

That's what happens to bum ass kids of successful celebrities. They have no talent so they gotta get attention the only way they know how.

No talent yet Jaden been Karate Kid and about to do a sequel...

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

You are aware that it's the THEORY of relativity correct?

And that's what this entire basis of them and this is about right?

Science uses specialized terms that have different meanings than everyday usage. These definitions correspond to the way scientists typically use these terms in the context of their work. Note, especially, that the meaning of “theory” in science is different than the meaning of “theory” in everyday conversation.

• Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.
• Hypothesis: A tentative statement about the natural world leading to deductions that can be tested. If the deductions are verified, the hypothesis is provisionally corroborated. If the deductions are incorrect, the original hypothesis is proved false and must be abandoned or modified. Hypotheses can be used to build more complex inferences and explanations.
• Law: A descriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under stated circumstances.
• Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.

Source
The Role of Theory in Advancing 21st Century Biology, National Academy of Sciences







Facts are not theory. Facts are proven. Theories are not. So anyone saying its proven or they are right. Are actually wrong and just strongly believing they are right

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

Didn't yall learn this shyt in 5th grade??? She did


Relativity: Theory or Law
Name: Carolyn
Status: student
Age: 13
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: 2000-2001

Question:Einstein's theory was proven over time. If theory is proven over course of time, they are to make it into a law. but why don't they make einstein's theory to law. it was proven over 70 years that it's correct.

Replies:Actually, it has not actually been proven to be correct. The proper way to state things is, "Nothing has disagreed with it." Using the word "Law" or "Theory" is not a big part of physics. Newton's three laws of motion only work when objects are not as small as atoms and not moving close to the speed of light. Nothing in physics is absolutely true. All the laws and theories are explanations of reality that seem to work.

Science cannot prove something true for all situations. There are too many possible situations to even try counting. Science tries to explain what is observed. These explanations are used to predict what should happen. Experiments are done to see if the predictions are correct. If so, the explanation worked in that one situation. If not, the explanation is probably wrong.

Kenneth Mellendorf


Click here to return to the Physics Archives



In other words, we cannot comprehend how many impossible situations are out in the universe to label CERTAIN things as facts. As I said before. It's beyond humans comprehension

 

[Dixon Cider]

lil nikkas raps are so trash

 

[BreezyH]

yall want these kids to be crazy so bad. 1st off, their teens, they obviously think they're super deep and no one else "gets it" - on that alone, they get a pass. but the bigger issue is, everything we debating about is man made constructs to explain shyt that happens. it seems like we have tested and got a lot of it right, but things like time are relative. if they are basing these theories off their own minds then let em. also understand, they can afford to. i have to be a work at x:xx am or it's gonna be a problem, but they don't suffer from such constraints.

 

[pimpineasy]

take abstract physics theoretical lectures from the coli brehs

 

[THE 101]

Someone set this thread on fire

 

[Zero]

Smart dumb nikka thread

 

[Whitty Hutton]

i don't care where in the fukking universe you are.... nikka when you check your watch is it 6:30?? when you count 60 minutes is it 7:30???


how would anyone know what's going on in the universe when we haven't even been past the moon yet

nikkas talking bout what goes on in the universe and haven't left america yet

I'm saying though...this philosophical nonsense got nikkas thinking too hard about something that's cut & dry

Teach me how to stretch my lifespan to 500 years or go back to warn a nikka he about to get shot and i'll entertain your thoughts on time being an illusion

 

[Pop123]

What's the issue? I didn't read the whole thing but the part posted isn't crazy. Time maybe not being real is a concept that plenty of physicists have discussed before, I don't know if there has been anything testable to that but it's been discussed for a while in that world.

 

[Clark Kent]

Tom Cruise getting to these kids too?

 

[up in here]

Didn't yall learn this shyt in 5th grade??? She did


Relativity: Theory or Law
Name: Carolyn
Status: student
Age: 13
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: 2000-2001

Question:Einstein's theory was proven over time. If theory is proven over course of time, they are to make it into a law. but why don't they make einstein's theory to law. it was proven over 70 years that it's correct.

Replies:Actually, it has not actually been proven to be correct. The proper way to state things is, "Nothing has disagreed with it." Using the word "Law" or "Theory" is not a big part of physics. Newton's three laws of motion only work when objects are not as small as atoms and not moving close to the speed of light. Nothing in physics is absolutely true. All the laws and theories are explanations of reality that seem to work.

Science cannot prove something true for all situations. There are too many possible situations to even try counting. Science tries to explain what is observed. These explanations are used to predict what should happen. Experiments are done to see if the predictions are correct. If so, the explanation worked in that one situation. If not, the explanation is probably wrong.

Kenneth Mellendorf


Click here to return to the Physics Archives



In other words, we cannot comprehend how many impossible situations are out in the universe to label CERTAIN things as facts. As I said before. It's beyond humans comprehension

Breh, I was with you a few pages back but you kinda went somewhere else with it.

Time is relative, but the Smith kids are using it wrong. A second on earth will always be a second. It won't be a year just because you are aware of the time. And a year on earth will always be a year, even if you don't pay attention and let your life pass you by. time is relative, but on earth it is a measurement of earth's naturally occurring cycles