Name a position that the Clippers are so much better than us at even without Steph.They're not beating the Clippers without Curly foh
They betterName a position that the Clippers are so much better than us at even without Steph.
Nah. Klay better than Crawford and Redikk, Barnes and Jeff Green are even, Blake and Draymond are close enough. Bogut can handle DJ. Livingston can bother CP3 with his length. It'll come down to the second units. I like our chances. With that being said, go Blazers!!!!!!They better
Pretty much. Really not sure where it's coming from. Some I expect is curry and Thompson not being dark enough for this site's taste. Some of it I'm sure is Kobe stans trying to tear down everything that isn't their hero, some is from LeBron stans mad over the Warriors beating the cavaliers last year, and I'd bet a ton is from 90's stans furious that they're raining 3's on everyone and breaking records, most notably the Bulls record for wins in a season.Im not getting where all of the Clipper respect comes from. I havent seen anything special.
Is it just Warrior hate?
Im not getting where all of the Clipper respect comes from. I havent seen anything special.
Is it just Warrior hate?
How does thinking the Clippers would beat the Warriors with the best player in the world inactive = Hating the Warriors
What im saying is....how do people assume the Clippers are to be favored. They havent looked all that great.. yet they seem to get a lot of respect.
So are the Clippers that good in peoples minds, or do they just not want to see the Warriors win? I get that losing Curry is huge..but the Warriors are still a deep team.