Bringing up a player's injury and saying "he's at 70%" implies you think that if he was at 100% the series would be different and Warriors would be tied or even up right now.
That's not what I'm saying at all, and you're taking what I said completely out of context.
Bringing up injuries at all means that's what you're implying. There's no reason to discuss this at all except for excuse making that's happening.
You did not get my point at all. You've basically jumped to the moon with this logic. The point was that folk used Conley's and Allen's injuries as reason (who were both less than 100% for the series) for why the Warriors won, yet any talk of Curry re-aggravating his injuries and they say it's excuses. Why is Curry's injuries just excuses for why they losing, and why isn't Allen's and Conley's injuries just excuses for they lost last season? That is a double standard.
I said there should be no asterisk last year because injuries happen,
Then there was absolutely no reason for you to quote me then, because I wasn't talking about you.
it'd be a shame if Warrior fans had to resort to what they hated to hear so much last year.
You say this like the Warriors' detractors didn't use other teams' injuries against them last season, and then saying it's no excuses for when they do have injuries this season. And you wonder why I say there's an agenda against them on this board...