Women's Tea App hacked by 4klan (Hacked Twice!) UPDATE 8/6: Women SUE for leaks and hacks!

[Neuromancer]

Thought it would be this.

 

[O.T.I.S.]

That boy Jason really like that

Lawsuit should be attached


But one reason I do fukk with Apple foreal.. they don’t play about their security shyt and their customers base.

 

[Umoja]

people been leaking from these apps/groups for years at this point


ignorance is bliss tho right simp?

App is called the "Tea" in reference to the phrase "Spill the tea", but bozos and simps really want to act as though security is the purpose.

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

god damn I haven’t seen so many mid, lackluster looking ass bytches in one place since Tagged

Don't disrespect tag like that

 

[Neuromancer]

Lawsuit should be attached


But one reason I do fukk with Apple foreal.. they don’t play about their security shyt and their customers base.

It should be.

 

[General Mills]

***BREAKING NEWS!!***

Women are stupid and easily manipulated into giving out information without a second THOT!

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

I'm not mad. I just see you for what you are, part of the problem.

Yelp deals with companies. Rate my professor deals with people working in a professional capacity. Both of those platforms allow the people affected to see what's being said about them and affords them the opportunity to defend themselves.

The existing situation is atrocious and you know it. If there was a platform like this for men to spill the tea on women they've dated, would you say it needs to be fine tuned or would you accept what it is clear, that it is rotten at the core and needs be scraped.

It is in the fukking name. Tea doesn't refer to security issues. It refers to gossip, the sort of things men understandably wouldn't want to be at the centre of.

And I stand by my previous comment and I appreciate you revealing that you're a hypocritical sack of shyt that doesn't care about the wellbeing of women. It is disturbing to see you pass of the promotion of unrealistic beauty standards, achieved by mutilation, as "performance art". You'll deepthroat just about anything if the word freedom cam attached to it.

You're not mad? The claim is belied by the fact that you're littering your posts with insults and name-calling, instead of reasonably defending your position.

This app deals with interpersonal experiences in dating, which can also impact safety and well-being. The point isn't that these platforms are identical, it's that any platform that collects subjective reviews carries risk and potential for abuse. That's why the solution isn't to destroy them wholesale, it's to improve moderation, and user protections. You're pretending this platform is uniquely dangerous because it centers on women's experiences, but the problem you're identifying is common to every review-based system.

No, what's actually atrocious is defending a doxxing campaign led by racists and misogynists because you identify with them. You're not standing up for fairness, or anything like that; you're just mad women have a space you can't control. And there already are platforms for this. From private Telegram groups to subreddits, MGTOW forums, incel boards, and revenge porn sites -- there are entire ecosystems that exist where men mock, rate, and destroy women's reputations.

The name doesn't invalidate the purpose of community-based apps. You're acting like using slang justifies all of this, as if tone is the most offensive thing. That's how empty your argument is. You're seizing on the name to paint the whole app as frivolous or malicious, which is a weak deflection from the actual issue: women created a space to flag harmful dating experiences because the risks they face are real.

This is not an argument opposing abuse, it's an attempt to delegitimize the idea that a platform like this is even needed. And then you turn around and defend it being hacked and disseminated by a known hate group as some kind of justified backlash. That's just spite. At least be honest about it.

And I stand by my comment that you're just mad. You're not actually worried about false accusations, reputational harm, or anyone's safety. You're angry that women have platforms to speak at all, and you're scrambling to reframe their speech as dangerous while cheerleading real harm carried out by hateful actors.

These were her charges: "blasphemy, instigating violence, illegally acquiring property, violating the national dress code and encouraging young people to commit corruption." You're defending a backwards theocratic government imprisoning her under the guise of caring about women. That's transparent. It's pathetic, even for you. Just say this is just about control. Be honest.

Fatemeh Khishvand, 18, known on Instagram as “Sahar Tabar,” has been detained since being arrested in October 2019 amid a nationwide crackdown on Instagram celebrities. Her widely followed Instagram account contained photos of her in dramatically altered forms often with heavy makeup and costumes that depicted her as a zombie.

She is facing years in prison for engaging in peaceful freedom of expression on her personal Instagram account and has been charged with “corruption on earth,” “incitement to corruption by encouraging youth to engage in lunacy,” “insulting the sacred” and “acquiring illicit income”

 

[Neuromancer]

Was this an inside job or did they have no real security?

 

[Canon]

You're not mad? The claim is belied by the fact that that you're littering your posts with insults and name-calling, instead of reasonably defending your position.

This app deals with interpersonal experiences in dating, which can also impact safety and well-being. The point isn't that these platforms are identical, it's that any platform that collects subjective reviews carries risk and potential for abuse. That's why the solution isn't to destroy them wholesale, it's to improve moderation, and user protections. You're pretending this platform is uniquely dangerous because it centers on women's experiences, but the problem you're identifying is common to every review-based system.

No, what's actually atrocious is defending a doxxing campaign led by racists and misogynists because you identify with them. You're not standing up for fairness, or anything like that; you're just mad women have a space you can't control. And there already are platforms for this. From private Telegram groups to subreddits, MGTOW forums, incel boards, and revenge porn sites -- there are entire ecosystems that exist where men mock, rate, and destroy women's reputations.

The name doesn't invalidate the purpose of community-based apps. You're acting like using slang justifies all of this, as if tone is the most offensive thing. That's how empty your argument is. You're seizing on the name to paint the whole app as frivolous or malicious, which is a weak deflection from the actual issue: women created a space to flag harmful dating experiences because the risks they face are real.

This is not an argument opposing abuse, it's an attempt to delegitimize the idea that a platform like this is even needed. And then you turn around and defend it being hacked and disseminated by a known hate group as some kind of justified backlash. That's just spite. At least be honest about it.

And I stand by my comment that you're just mad. You're not actually worried about false accusations, reputational harm, or anyone's safety. You're angry that women have platforms to speak at all, and you're scrambling to reframe their speech as dangerous while cheerleading real harm carried out by hateful actors.

These were her charges: "blasphemy, instigating violence, illegally acquiring property, violating the national dress code and encouraging young people to commit corruption." You're defending a backwards theocratic government imprisoning her under the guise of caring about women. That's transparent. It's pathetic, even for you. Just say this is just about control. Be honest.

Shut the fukk up fakkit

 

[AAKing23]

They say curiosity killed the cat

The most educated strike again

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Women aren’t perfect angels and do dudes dirty as well

If you wanna be rumoring gossiping lying ass hoe enjoy getting your location and life fukked with

Who said that they are?

 

[O.T.I.S.]

it's not that hard not to have public facing open databases.

you don't have to be a security specialist to avoid that.

True.. if you know wtf youre doing..


And we can also discuss PII laws.

Personally Identifiable Information (PII) encompasses any data that can be used to identify, locate, or contact an individual. This includes both direct identifiers like a name or social security number, and indirect identifiers that, when combined with other data, could lead to identification. Essentially, if information can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, it's considered PII.

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

The problem is not the app itself, it is the fact that the person can't defend themselves from slander. Women are human beings, they have the same propensity to lie, be vindictive, etc as men.

If you are fine with such an app that only allows women to see it, would you be fine with one that only allowed men to see it too? Meaning, what is good for the goose is good for the gander?

I'll feel the same way if the genders were swapped.

 

[Uachet]

I'll feel the same way if the genders were swapped.

Then you are atleast not a hypocrite on this issue. I commend you.

 

[Neuromancer]

I'll feel the same way if the genders were swapped.

We would hope.